GrahamWelland
Subscriber & Workshop Member
I'm considering (dreading?) returning to shooting MF digital after a long hiatus away and I'm beginning to look at the P20+ & Mamiya 645 AFDII combo. I'm deliberately looking at the P20+ as my preference for MF has always been square or 6x7. Previously I used to shoot with a Kodak DCS 645M & AFD and enjoyed the format (square) but in the end went back to regular Nikon DSLR's due in part due to problems with the AFD/Kodak integration and too many locked up camera situations plus lack of lens wider than 35mm. There never was an issue with the image quality though and it's only now that my D3X that compares with it.
My question is how does the P20+ compare with the rest of the P+ back range in terms of performance - noise, 16 bit colour fidelity & DR etc? I would assume that the larger sensors would actually be beneficial vs the higher pixel brothers with the exception of the Sensor+ models. Is this a vaild assumption? Would I be buying into the low end of the range that I'd regret vs saving towards one of the other backs & crop?
Anyone else using the P20+ for landscape work?
Thanks & have pity ...
My question is how does the P20+ compare with the rest of the P+ back range in terms of performance - noise, 16 bit colour fidelity & DR etc? I would assume that the larger sensors would actually be beneficial vs the higher pixel brothers with the exception of the Sensor+ models. Is this a vaild assumption? Would I be buying into the low end of the range that I'd regret vs saving towards one of the other backs & crop?
Anyone else using the P20+ for landscape work?
Thanks & have pity ...