The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Official USA Pricing for Leica S2

Georg Baumann

Subscriber Member
I think maybe I was being nice but agree. 10k over a very excellent Hassy or Phase setup is just over the top. The image quality no matter how you slice it will NOT be any better
+1

then again, for the 10k over, you have to take the seals into consideration. How many seals did we have, 39?

That would be 256.41 per seal, just in line with Leica pricing strategy. :ROTFL: Of course, they are not normal rubber seals, they are chewed soft by Koalas under the age of 5.
 

Guy Mancuso

Administrator, Instructor
Guy,
Even Leica is saying "as good as" for comparisons with the 39-50MP backs, so "better" is not even in their evaluation.

LJ

P.S. I know we all should be a bit more "nice" as you put it, and I apologize for some of my expressed outrage, but seriously, this pricing and marketing is insulting to sensibilities.:wtf:
No need to be nice though, it's what you feel and many others feel the same way. Talk about a ****ty way to introduce a new product when all your potential customers think your nuts and are insulted by your pricing scheme . That is not is a good way to run a company.

Seriously as a MF shooter that already has a system in place and has tested every Phase back made extensively, I feel my intelligence in this market is insulted by this. Trying to figure out what the hell I am missing here. Sure it has some nice features but none of them are revolutionary.
 

David K

Workshop Member
It's 10 pages since David Farkas opened this thread and let it run without further input.

David - Most of us here have probably followed your enthusiasm for the S2 project [many of us will have read your blog]. I'm sure you are still reading - fancy sharing your thoughts with us?

............. Chris
I spoke to David at length yesterday afternoon and, while I don't feel it's my place to speak for him, I think I can share one bit of information without betraying any confidences. Not one single person on his extensive waiting list has cancelled their order following the pricing announcement... and it's not just a couple of people either... it's a bunch.
 

Ben Rubinstein

Active member
Canon and Nikon (at least in the UK) have pro services justified by amount of kit owned and pro usage. For canon it's 2 DSLR's and 3 L lenses and proof that you're a pro. You then get CPS service in all of europe and probably worldwide. 3 day turnaround on repairs, loan of equipment if it takes longer or if you want to try out a new lens, free CPS magazine every quarter and free seminars where they hand out loads of free and worthwhile goodies.

I know it now costs in the US but the most expensive service is still probably better and faster than this platinum whatsit, includes a whole bunch of very impressive goodies and is about $500 for everything.

I assume NPS is similar.

So let me ask you, couple of 5D mkII's or even 1Ds mkIII's. 21 megapixels and probably all that a client could ever want. Cheap (stupidly in comparison) to buy, pro service, rental everywhere, usage of almost any lens that you could ever want or need, replacement cameras and lenses in every single city, easy to borrow from friends, etc, etc. As a business decision you have to ask what you will achieve with spending more. What that money will buy you in extra revenue. Can anyone begin to suggest that in this day and age a business can justify a system like this from a revenue perspective? Heck even just owning a MFDB is getting to be questionable when your life will be so much easier, your processing faster and your peace of mind greater - using a modern top level DSLR.

I remember when I was thinking about changing to Nikon last year. My wife asked me 'what extra will shooting Nikon add to your business'. The answer was not revenue, just ease of use in my own case. At the time it was a lot of money for ease of use and I didn't do it - just in time before the economy crashed and my work dried up horribly for 6 months.

I have no doubt that the MFT graphs are incredible, the look spectacular. But unless your clients will pay more for it (in this economy?) then you are throwing money in the garbage of your own snobbishness.
 

dfarkas

Workshop Member
It's 10 pages since David Farkas opened this thread and let it run without further input.

David - Most of us here have probably followed your enthusiasm for the S2 project [many of us will have read your blog]. I'm sure you are still reading - fancy sharing your thoughts with us?

............. Chris
Sure Chris.... why not?

The reasons for my absence are twofold.

1) I have been extremely busy during the last few days. I spent all of Thursday, Friday, and Saturday touching base with my S2 pre-order list. I just haven't had the time to read everything or post. In fact, I've only been able to get through 2/3rds of my list.

2) Even if I did have the time, many are so entrenched in their viewpoints that little or nothing I might have said would really matter. My input would be conveniently dismissed as "marketing hype" or "bs" or whatever.

That being said, I'm sure some here are interested to know how my conversations over the last few days have gone. Maybe I live in a bubble, but my reality has not coincided with what is happening online. Of all my pre-orders, no one was insulted, offended, shocked, etc. by the S2 pricing. In fact, no one backed out or cancelled due to price. All those that were interested in getting an S2, are still excited to get one in October. There are a couple who will wait for the 30-90 to be available. Everyone wants to see final specs (within a week or two) and see real images, just as I do. But, the price was expected. Part of this was due to my comminicating a realistic price for last 6-9 months in all my conversations. I told anyone who asked that the price would be about $20K for the body and about $4-6K for the lenses. I've seen the Euro go from about $1.25 to the current $1.43. Leica told me that at anything above $1.35, they'd have to adjust pricing. So, the 10-15% higher price for the body was somewhat expected.

Leica has clearly stated that fashion, beauty, advertising, and commercial are the main target markets, as well as advanced amateurs who want the best balance of ease, handling, and image quailty. In reviewing my list, I'd say that Leica has so far done a good job, as I have representation from all of these specialties, as well as high-end professional landscape photographers (those shooting for coffee-table books and grand-format commercial prints sold through galleries and/or corporate decorators).

There appears to be some confusion over the warranty and add-on service packages. To clarify, the body and lenses come with a standard 12-month warranty (same as a Phase Classic warranty or standard Hasselblad warranty). The service packages are optional add-ons just like Hassy's Camera Care Plan or Phase's Value Added Warranty, which also cost several thousand $$.

The Premium Service Package includes:
- Extra year of transferable warranty
- Camera swap service during the first three months (no repairs, just a new camera the next day)
- Special phone hotline with dedicated S2 specialist
- guaranteed spare parts availibility for 6 years
- 30% discount on non-warranty repairs (ex. dropping camera)

The Platinum Service Package includes:
(same as above), plus...
- free of charge maintenance including one shutter and/or central shutter replacement (doesn't have to be broken)
- free of charge loaner service during repairs

Keep in mind, also, that customers who purchase from me can get loaners or rentals from me at no charge regardless of service level, and can reach me 24/7 for help and support. That is just being a good dealer, rather than a box mover. I'd say that the Premium package is plenty for most individual shooters. The Platinum is geared more towards rental studios and busy top-tier professionals. $495 for lenses and $1,495 for the body isn't really that unreasonable for the Premium option.

Yes, Lightroom will come bundled with the camera. There will also be tethering software that can control all functions of the camera, including camera focus, all settings, etc. The application doesn't do RAW conversion, but rather controls the camera and deposits images in whatever folder you choose. Hot-folder-capable applications like LR, Aperture, or even C1 can be used - this is the user's choice.

As to why Leica didn't bundle the 70mm with the camera, you might be interested to learn that only about 50% of my customers chose to order the 70mm with the camera. The fact is that everyone is different. How would you feel about being required to buy an M8.2 with a 35mm Summicron? Sure, a certain percentage would like it (like me), but most would prefer to pick their own lens package. Same with the S2.

Regarding switching from other systems, I have taken trade-ins on two H3DII-39s, one H3DII-31, one H3DII-50, a D3x, and many other assorted items. Other customers have already sold H3DII-39 systems, at least one P45+, and Canon/Nikon systems to fund the S2. So, obviously, for these folks, there is enough reason to switch platforms.

The reality is that we will see final specs within the next week or two and images before camera availibility. Of course, no one wants to drop $30K on a system without seeing images. But, most know what to expect:

- Lenses without compromise that can be shot at any aperture (not just f/11)
- The smallest, lightest, fastest MF system and the only one with weather sealing in a fully modern body
- 1/500th of a sec flash sync with CS lenses and 1/400th of a sec max shutter with FP shutter (easy as flipping a switch)
- Large, bright, hi-res LCD
- Accurate AF (that doesn't require a 3x loupe)
- Minimal mirror slap

If you've handled the S2 for any amount of time and have experience with other MF systems, you can immediately tell a difference. Since switching to SSDs in my new laptop, I can't ever imaging going back to a platter-based HDD. It would be painful. Likewise, I think that once photographers start using the S2 they will have a very difficult time going back to other systems. Maybe they get the job done, but not as smoothly and seamlessly as they might with the S2.

As Jono and others have said, if the IQ is there (in addition to the ergos), the camera will indeed sell. And, sell very well at that. Leica's imminent demise is grossly overstated.

I am not trying to "sell" you guys on the S2. I honestly think that the camera has done a great job of selling itself already. It is not for everyone, just as a $40K P65+ isn't for everyone, or an $11K Profoto Pro-8a power pack, or an $11K Profoto 10' Para Umbrella, etc. I know that many would like to have a chance to use the S2, and would like the price to be under $15K. I'd like a Porsche Cayman S to be the same price as an Accord, but I doubt going on a Porsche forum and convincing everyone there that the Cayman should sell for $25K is going to change anything. A Porsche is a Porsche and priced as such. Likewise, the S2 offers a certain value proposition to photographers and is also priced accordingly.

David
 

tom in mpls

Active member
Sure it has some nice features but none of them are revolutionary.
Guy, I believe the ease of use is huge. DSLR's are a breeze compared to the MFDB systems. If prices were comparable, it would be a no-brainer for me if I were to dive back into larger format. In my opinion, this integration IS the revolution. However, this still begs the question about current pricing.

On another note, some are pointing out that with MFDB you only need to upgrade the DB, while keeping your existing body. I consider the S2 to be a large format back that includes a new, up to date body for "free". Since the cost of a MF body seems minor compared to the cost of the DB, why not "give away" a new body with the purchase of the DB? Isn't that what Phase does? Or, think of it as getting a brand new body with the purchase of the S2 back. And what you get is the best integrated body/back system available in the larger format arena (I think).
 
Last edited:

Guy Mancuso

Administrator, Instructor
I think essentially Phase gives you a body and lens for 2k over the back price. Which is a pretty big cost savings than buying separate. I have no issues with the AFDIII myself except for the slight shutter lag other than that I can shoot just like any DSLR in style. Just a little slower with my back though. The P40+ is a lot faster shooting times.

But it is no secret almost every Phase camera owner would like to see a new body which i expect to come at any point now.
 

Christopher

Active member
Well Thanks for the answer David Farkas. I was interested in a S2 and I am still in a way. On the other hand the price really killed the interest. Why ? Well I have my P65 and it works great. It has by far the best file quality I have ever seen. I'm pretty sure that the actual file quality will be less from the S2. Or certianly not better. In the end I would never sell the P65 for a S2 System. Now that leaves my Canon SLR System. A 25K System of gear, which I could sell, but then I would be missing stuff like a long zoom like the 70.200 a long lens like the 300 and 500, but more important a high ISO performance. I do believe that the Leica S2 will have great ISO 400 and 800, but that is not enough. My P65 does amazing ISO 400. So one stop better noise isn't good enough. However, if the S2 can deliver clean or better let's say really usable ISO 1600, than I perhaps will start thinking about this system again. As long as the 30-90 zoom won't cost 8000 ;-)
 

tom in mpls

Active member
In what ways specifically do you feel a DSLR is "easier" to use than a modern, automated MF camera with DB?
2 different battery systems, separate on/off and controls. That was what I had with my Contax. Are other systems better?

Also, I am wondering if the size, shape, and bulk of the S2 would be an improvement over the MF systems. I did find the Contax was a bit awkward.

My knowledge of systems other than Contax is limited.
 

Georg Baumann

Subscriber Member
I spin prayer wheels in both hands at 65,000 rpm that phase one at least considers a sealed body and lenses for the near fuiture roadmap.

This, imho, Leica did right!
 

fotografz

Well-known member
2 different battery systems, separate on/off and controls. That was what I had with my Contax. Are other systems better?

Also, I am wondering if the size, shape, and bulk of the S2 would be an improvement over the MF systems. I did find the Contax was a bit awkward.

My knowledge of systems other than Contax is limited.
The H camera uses one battery to drive everything. Works well and last a long time. Controlling things like flash comp on the H is easier than any 35mm DSLR.

35mm DSLRs have multiple user selected focus points which is an advantage when using fast lenses wide open. They shoot faster as well as ususally focus faster, and have wider and much longer glass available.
 

cmb_

Subscriber & Workshop Member
The price in euro for the S2 in Germany is high but not outrageous. At Meister Camera the S2 is listed for 18,600 euro (22.200 + Platinum Service). The lens prices are 3600 euro to 5280 euro (4680 to 6000 euro w/CS). This includes 19% vat.

For US customers the week dollar is a big problem.
 

carstenw

Active member
Yes, and while I am not going to make myself popular with this comment, to be honest I am happy to finally see a company price things the same way everywhere. The weak Dollar is a problem I am unhappy to see imported here.

Additionally, many companies take advantage of European buyers' willingness to pay more by jacking up prices. Adobe is a notorious example, with Photoshop CS4 costing about $600 in the States, and typically €1100 in Germany. Absolutely outrageous.

One thing puzzles me a bit: of all the people in this thread, were any actually on the waiting list for the S2?
 

Christopher

Active member
Well yes, it is great that they kept the S2 under 20k Eurs, that is the only reason I'm still thinking about it from time to time. I wasn't on a waiting list, but I talked to my dealer in Germany. The reason behind it was, that I would not be interested in a S2 before more lenses and very good and deep reviews were out. Before making any call whatsoever I want to see images from the 30-90, and because that won't happen for some time I don't have to make any serious decisions right now.

I think there was a 70-80% chance that I would by an S2, but these prices narrowed it down to around 10-20. I have to see some stunning reasons, like very good ISO 1600 and a few other things before I really reconsider buying one next year.

Oh and if i lived in the US or UK, I wouldn't even think about buying one. I know its the $, still it is way to much money.
 

Quentin_Bargate

Well-known member
I spoke to David at length yesterday afternoon and, while I don't feel it's my place to speak for him, I think I can share one bit of information without betraying any confidences. Not one single person on his extensive waiting list has cancelled their order following the pricing announcement... and it's not just a couple of people either... it's a bunch.
Bit early to cancel, even assuming they are all aware (as David suggests they are) of the price announcement. Let's see where they are at when the cash has to hit the counter :cool:

I am not trying to "sell" you guys on the S2. I honestly think that the camera has done a great job of selling itself already. It is not for everyone, just as a $40K P65+ isn't for everyone, or an $11K Profoto Pro-8a power pack, or an $11K Profoto 10' Para Umbrella, etc. I know that many would like to have a chance to use the S2, and would like the price to be under $15K. I'd like a Porsche Cayman S to be the same price as an Accord, but I doubt going on a Porsche forum and convincing everyone there that the Cayman should sell for $25K is going to change anything. A Porsche is a Porsche and priced as such. Likewise, the S2 offers a certain value proposition to photographers and is also priced accordingly.
Hmm that reads like an appeal to snob value and exclusivity, where price becomes a reason in itself to buy something others cannot afford.
 
Last edited:

cmb_

Subscriber & Workshop Member
So, from Meister I could buy 2 M8 "White Editiions", one with the 21 Lux and one with the 24 Lux for 24,000 euro or I could get the S2 (body only) and the 70mm (no CS) for 22,200 euro. :thumbs:





;)
 
Top