Lloyd
Active member
That is simply rockin'!!! :bugeyes: Wow.Having a blast shooting weddings with the D3X. Nice color. Great skin tones.
ISO 500, 24-70 @ 24/5, fill with a SB900.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
That is simply rockin'!!! :bugeyes: Wow.Having a blast shooting weddings with the D3X. Nice color. Great skin tones.
ISO 500, 24-70 @ 24/5, fill with a SB900.
Great image and colors. A grad ND filter?Having a blast shooting weddings with the D3X. Nice color. Great skin tones.
ISO 500, 24-70 @ 24/5, fill with a SB900.
No ND filter ... usually don't have time for stuff like that when shooting weddings.Great image and colors. A grad ND filter?
MG
That's what I thought ND filters are for slow paced landscape photography.No ND filter ... usually don't have time for stuff like that when shooting weddings.
Used Lightroom 2s new brushes ... specifically the custom grad filter that you can place exactly where you want it, and apply it as much as you want, as many times as you want. Just that one new LR-2 feature has cut hours off of my processing times for weddings ... plus I used a few tricks in PS.
I find the D3X 14 bit files to be amazingly workable.
Niiiiiice :salute:Having a blast shooting weddings with the D3X. Nice color. Great skin tones.
ISO 500, 24-70 @ 24/5, fill with a SB900.
It is really hard to see what is being achieved hereNiiiiiice :salute:
Hello fotografz,Having a blast shooting weddings with the D3X. Nice color. Great skin tones.
ISO 500, 24-70 @ 24/5, fill with a SB900.
What do you mean by "achieved" Woody?It is really hard to see what is being achieved here
Woody
Well Woody, yes I do have both systems and a good deal of the better lenses for both. Without rehashing all the discourse from the Sony forum it boils down to what I said there in summary ... and meant every word of it ... for which I took a personal lambasting. If I had to choose, I'd sell the entire Sony system before the D3/D3X system. Nothing personal, just business. From what I can tell, most dissing of the D3X comes from those who don't use the D3X and rely on second hand info/opinions/pictures from this relatively new camera. After all, it does take some time to learn about any new camera.Marc
What I meant is that on the web it is hard to see the differences one camera to another that is possible when viewing large tiffs or better still large prints.
I have heard much dissing of the D3X (using the A900) as the comparison. But I have now been using mine for about two months, including large file and large print landscapes. I think it is an amazing machine and it can certainly handle the rigors of field work. Built like a tank.
I don't have an A900 so I can't compare. I have seen many files that I like and a fair number which I think have too much shadow noise. But as I say, i don't have one, have taken no images with one, so can't really render an opinion.
You have both so how do you choose which one to work with. Seems to me you would not need both 35mm DSLR systems.
Just trying to learn here...........no other agenda
Woody
Hello Jorgen,L77,
Looking at your plumeria, we should hope for more rain. Beautiful
nice I have been wanting a d@h for a while now!!Orchid after the rain. Leica R 50mm Summicron with Leitax mount + Nikon TC-16A + Nikon D2H. Aperture @ f2.8. Thanks for looking. Leica 77