glenerrolrd
Workshop Member
If you read Diglloyd s blog you will see that the last two or three expensive pro lenses have all had major QC issues.
1. First the 70-200/2.8VR2..decentered .
2. 300/2.8VR2 nano coated...decenteed,soft .
3. new 24/1.4 ....AF problems.
The designs all seem to be world class but the samples have been awful and I don t mean just a slight differences in edge sharpness.
First you can t get the lenses and then if you get a bad one yikes.
I did get a bad copy of the 24-70/2.8 last year and they tuned it perfectly at one of the USA repair sites and had it back to me in 2 weeks.
1. First the 70-200/2.8VR2..decentered .
2. 300/2.8VR2 nano coated...decenteed,soft .
3. new 24/1.4 ....AF problems.
The designs all seem to be world class but the samples have been awful and I don t mean just a slight differences in edge sharpness.
First you can t get the lenses and then if you get a bad one yikes.
I did get a bad copy of the 24-70/2.8 last year and they tuned it perfectly at one of the USA repair sites and had it back to me in 2 weeks.