Most reviews are looking at the wide end, has anyone compared both lenses at 35mm?
I'm reading the 16-35 doesn't perform that well at 35, don't know which is better.
17-35 also looks so much better at the wide end in terms of distortion.
F 2.8 is not a big advantage to me, as I see the 17-35 just beginning to look good at 4, squeaking by at 3.5.
16-35 better corners. Deciding which to buy for reportage people shooting, thanks.