charlesphoto
New member
Okay, I have a decision to make on buying a Zeiss 35 (found mint locally). I already have a Nikon 35 AFD which is actually a pretty good lens. Anyone have feelings about how the Zeiss weighs in against this? I don't need autofocus as I have a 17-35mm to pull out for those times I do (and am considering a 24-70 someday when they are actually available at the correct price!).
I have a Zeiss 25 coming to replace my Nikon 24 which is not that great of a lens (though still not terrible for the $200 I paid for a mint copy). I know the Zeiss 28 is a great performer but not really a focal length that's ever done anything for me. Neither wide enough nor "normal" enough. I'll probably add a 50 1.4 at some point if I find a good price on one (I actually think my cheapo Nikon 50 f/1.8 is a stellar lens).
Anyway, I do really have to stop spending at some point (ha!) but is the Zeiss 35 that much better than the Nikon?
I have a Zeiss 25 coming to replace my Nikon 24 which is not that great of a lens (though still not terrible for the $200 I paid for a mint copy). I know the Zeiss 28 is a great performer but not really a focal length that's ever done anything for me. Neither wide enough nor "normal" enough. I'll probably add a 50 1.4 at some point if I find a good price on one (I actually think my cheapo Nikon 50 f/1.8 is a stellar lens).
Anyway, I do really have to stop spending at some point (ha!) but is the Zeiss 35 that much better than the Nikon?