Hello,
I am a long time Nikon user but have never been totally happy with skin tones (somewhat yelloish look) and texture of skin (of kids).
Now lately I have mainly used 80%LR and 20% phase one for my D700 files.
I have tried a A900 yesterday and tones+colors look much more to my taset (as do those from the Pentax K5).
Now since I own massive investment in Nikon lenses I wondered if Nikon Capture would allow me to get more pleasing colors (of course subjective) and better microdetail. I find the Nikon files sometimes look if there was some slight noise reduction applied even in raw files?? which could destroy some microdetails of skin?
For you Nikon users-is LR a good Nikon converter or do I have to look deeper in Nikon Capture for best results?
Thanks for any feedback. Tom
I am a long time Nikon user but have never been totally happy with skin tones (somewhat yelloish look) and texture of skin (of kids).
Now lately I have mainly used 80%LR and 20% phase one for my D700 files.
I have tried a A900 yesterday and tones+colors look much more to my taset (as do those from the Pentax K5).
Now since I own massive investment in Nikon lenses I wondered if Nikon Capture would allow me to get more pleasing colors (of course subjective) and better microdetail. I find the Nikon files sometimes look if there was some slight noise reduction applied even in raw files?? which could destroy some microdetails of skin?
For you Nikon users-is LR a good Nikon converter or do I have to look deeper in Nikon Capture for best results?
Thanks for any feedback. Tom