Just curious Peter ... certain images such as ... ?Mirror-less just makes taking certain images much easier than this was in pure DSLR ages.
Peter
Don't get me wrong, it is amazing what is being done to shrink the tools. However, I equate functional aspects directly to the tasks I have at hand ... so, there well may be others that revel in the new new tech, but I don't see it as replacing DSLRs for many applications quite yet. Thus the curiosity as to what images or tasks others see as being "easier".
IMO, it is far easier to use a DSLR in studio (I work with both) ... and as far a Sony is concerned not having instant LCD review makes it even slower for shooting events. The lag is not conducive to "decisive moment" type work, smearing when moving the camera in low light is far more distracting than a OVF, etc. etc. Thus my A7R is my least used money maker tool and is reserved for walk about non critical stuff and some travel stuff just because it's small ... but in truth is over-kill for 90% of it.
I do "get" that you can use some specialty lenses like T/S, yet size has little to do with that since most of it is tripod work.
For my M lenses, the Monochrome is a far better solution in almost every respect.
- Marc