Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Nice images, William.Hi ,
I got my D750 last week after almost 5 years with D700 ( still have it). So far I'm very pleased. Files are very good, AF is quick, the whole camera is quick too. 2 SD cards, excellent video,etc . I'm still discovering though, but very happy so far. Here is a link with some of my first photographs with it:
Nikon D750 – first photographs… | Wilhelm Westergren Photography
If any questions feel free to ask.
Cheers,
Thanks!!!Nice images, William.
:thumbup:
Thanks Daniel!I'll second that.
Some great images on your website, emmawest72.
Yup, this seems to be the F100 of Nikon DSLRs. As good as it gets at a reasonable price. The D810 is still better, more advanced etc., but also more expensive, larger and heavier without giving many, if any, advantages that will translate into better images. Just like the F5 before it.Seems to be a really great camera - I am very interested. Maybe one of the last "classic" DSLRs we see ..... (from Nikon).
Today I had the chance to compare the D750 to the D810 at my dealer - they had a Nikon day organized. My findings were:Yup, this seems to be the F100 of Nikon DSLRs. As good as it gets at a reasonable price. The D810 is still better, more advanced etc., but also more expensive, larger and heavier without giving many, if any, advantages that will translate into better images. Just like the F5 before it.
This is an instant classic, and if I didn't already own a D700, I would have been all over it.
I've done exactly this. I had the 2.8 but found I never used it because of its inconvenient size and weight. Sold it and bought the 4 a couple of months ago and the 4 has had more use since then than the 2.8 ever did.e) I would go with the 4/70-200 in the future if I did not have the 2.8 version. Maybe I will even sell the 2.8 as the 4 is so much more portable