both yes and no, Michael.
No to these lines on the street, while at first glance I thought that they were annoying, too distracting, too much taken attention from the "stilleben", Still-life behind, together with the boy, which has this strange and peculiar harmony, almost weird (isolated seen, a touch of Rene Magritte).
But on the other hand yes in a way, while the picture might be too quit without them, too simple (and therefore too boring). Like the red dot in an abstract painting, that are drawing the attention, and while doing it, it makes this weird balance, that look like an unbalance, but isn't, while it hides the treasure, and therefore open a longer lasting attention. So the unbalance becomes a balance. One could call it a sort of hidden tension.(can you see it?)
And therefore it might be a yes...
Thorkil
(I wish I could get up and being out at 6 or 7.,..yes the morning light, one of the magic creations...but I can be so seriously lazy)
No to these lines on the street, while at first glance I thought that they were annoying, too distracting, too much taken attention from the "stilleben", Still-life behind, together with the boy, which has this strange and peculiar harmony, almost weird (isolated seen, a touch of Rene Magritte).
But on the other hand yes in a way, while the picture might be too quit without them, too simple (and therefore too boring). Like the red dot in an abstract painting, that are drawing the attention, and while doing it, it makes this weird balance, that look like an unbalance, but isn't, while it hides the treasure, and therefore open a longer lasting attention. So the unbalance becomes a balance. One could call it a sort of hidden tension.(can you see it?)
And therefore it might be a yes...
Thorkil
(I wish I could get up and being out at 6 or 7.,..yes the morning light, one of the magic creations...but I can be so seriously lazy)