Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Yes, same battery for both, but you might want to buy extras for longer trips. Also, same battery is used in the Ricoh GRD (DB 65).Oh boy!
Just as an aside - I assume that both cameras take the same size battery and that if you have both cameras you have 4 batteries to play with?
Lee
Hi Jono,It sounds wonderful - I can live with slow processing of raw files and slow AF but it's the last paragraph which kills it for me.
I've spent too much time struggling with proprietary RAW formats, and I'm simply not going to do it anymore.
I don't care if it's the best camera in the world, if I have to change my processing software again I'm simply not interested. If Leica and Pentax and others can produce DNG files . . why not Sigma? (of course, there may be technical reasons, as there are with the new Fuji sensors) - but I'm sure I'm not alone in refusing to use Silkypix or the Sigma or Sony or Olympus raw processing software.
All good here thanks. Emma was on the brink of buying a pair if pocket ponies, but I think the lust has worn off.Hi Jono,
I used to use Silkypix and it was pretty good. Its a general package for most cameras so it is less limited that the nonesense that is Sigma Photo Pro. However, I don't use it (Silkypix) any more.
ACR (which I use) and Lightroom now support Hasselblad. I would hope for Sigma support in the future. But who knows?
Hope all is well. Glynis is about to buy a new foal...
Q
I know I don't - I'm really not even tempted - but it is ONLY because of the support - Even if you said SPP was wonderful, I still wouldn't want to - everything is catalogued and sorted in Aperture - using something else for some photos is a Right Royal Pain In The A$$!Jono
SPP isn't *that* bad.
You know you want to ...
Lee
dispite all the words......its all about one thing.....You will just have to try oneI know I don't - I'm really not even tempted - but it is ONLY because of the support - Even if you said SPP was wonderful, I still wouldn't want to - everything is catalogued and sorted in Aperture - using something else for some photos is a Right Royal Pain In The A$$!
No, I don't think so - as I say, I've done it so often, and it always ends in tears. Mind you, I'm very impressed with the output.dispite all the words......its all about one thing.....You will just have to try one
Thorkil
just would have liked to see some DP1/2M pictures from your handNo, I don't think so - as I say, I've done it so often, and it always ends in tears. Mind you, I'm very impressed with the output.
Don't know where the mixed feelings are...but anyway...doesn't matter, as long as one doesn't expect the camera to do the housecleaning too, (but... take a closer looks at Quentins thread)Seems like a lot of trying to convince someone to a camera because of poor software, despite mixed feeling camera..... Surely none of this makes sense, I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole unless you are crazy!
Better to stay away if you ask me!
Jono,I know I don't - I'm really not even tempted - but it is ONLY because of the support - Even if you said SPP was wonderful, I still wouldn't want to - everything is catalogued and sorted in Aperture - using something else for some photos is a Right Royal Pain In The A$$!