Tim
Active member
We've analysed the Quattro output and compared it to the Merrills. We do yet have to see the DP1Q and DP3Q of course - they may surprise. I look forward to seeing that.
Past this where do you think Sigma should go?
Discussing your ideas for academic purposes only.
I'd like a true Foveon design in larger FF lower resolution sensor. Less resolution similar to the Sony A7s approach. 8-10 MPixel in a Foveon design is enough.
Body size akin to the Sony RX1 in a weather resistant body. Must have a fixed non telescoping lens. Basic controls, similar to the Leica X1 . Video not needed. A built-in EVF using current EVF tech. Lens designs of 21mm / 45mm / 90mm versions with an integrated tele converter for the 90mm to take it it 135mm.
A RAW format that does not tie us to SPP. DNG anyone?
Your thoughts?
Past this where do you think Sigma should go?
Discussing your ideas for academic purposes only.
I'd like a true Foveon design in larger FF lower resolution sensor. Less resolution similar to the Sony A7s approach. 8-10 MPixel in a Foveon design is enough.
Body size akin to the Sony RX1 in a weather resistant body. Must have a fixed non telescoping lens. Basic controls, similar to the Leica X1 . Video not needed. A built-in EVF using current EVF tech. Lens designs of 21mm / 45mm / 90mm versions with an integrated tele converter for the 90mm to take it it 135mm.
A RAW format that does not tie us to SPP. DNG anyone?
Your thoughts?