Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Hi Terry,Thomas -this shot is stunning I hope you print and display it.
HI TomHi Terry,
thank you for your comment.
I have had an idea - to print about one image a week at 20x30cm and put it in a large album as a memory. just to keep the best moment/image/feeling of the week in memory. (too many images are just staying on my harddrive without any attention) So this one has been the first image in this poster album.
Hi Jono,Getting ready for dinner
.....
all with the 35 macro f2.8 auto ISO
I realize you are trying to make best use of your existing Nikon glass with this comparison, but for someone who is starting from scratch a better analogy to your D7000 kit would be the following:I think this is a good decision. D700 can be beaten by small number of cameras if it comes to functionality, IQ and AF speed. Downsides as we know are weight etc.
Did the following exercise:
D700, 24-40, 70-200 results in 3.5kg
D7000, 16-85, 55-300 all VRII results in 2kg
K5, 16-50, 50-135 results in 2.5kg
So clear winner here is a D7000 set although you do not get 2.8 but instead full VRII support, whereas the K5 has built in IS. From a price point the D7000 set is also the clear winner.
Of course one also can get the 2.8/17-55 Nikkor, which is faster, but then you do not have any IS. So I would prefer clearly the IS (called VRII). And I would have all my 2.8 FF glass to be used with the D7000 anyway if I really need or want that.
And what is amazing (to me at least) is that according to the EXIF it was shot at ISO3200.Hi Tom - Quite agree with Terry - that shot of your little girl is really grand.
:clap::clap:
You sound like a man who doesn't have a K5 yet!And what is amazing (to me at least) is that according to the EXIF it was shot at ISO3200.
I agree.You sound like a man who doesn't have a K5 yet!
the high ISO really is splendid, it's not so much the noise (or lack of it) but the colour, which seems to stay good right up to 6400 (I haven't tried 12800 because I really don't seem to need it :ROTFL
all the best
Hi There RaistReading this thread is not healthy for me at all... right now...
I am mulling a system switch and it's pricey. Would have to dump a bunch of lenses. Still looking for what are the really good Pentax lenses for this system.
- Raist
Oh Well
I think it's all angels dancing on the heads of pins . . . all this stuff works properly these days. . . . . maybe it's just what one likes that matters?
Here are a couple of shots I liked with the K5. both are at 6400 ISO
the first one is with the 60-250 220mm 1/125th f4
[]
That was ISO 6400? ... that was... ISO 6400? ... that was.... umm....
Do you have them full size somewhere? (or just a 100% crop)
Thanks
- Raist
HI There RaistThat was ISO 6400? ... that was... ISO 6400? ... that was.... umm....Oh Well
I think it's all angels dancing on the heads of pins . . . all this stuff works properly these days. . . . . maybe it's just what one likes that matters?
Here are a couple of shots I liked with the K5. both are at 6400 ISO
the first one is with the 60-250 220mm 1/125th f4
Do you have them full size somewhere? (or just a 100% crop)
Thanks
- Raist
HI ThereThere are a few discussions on other websites about the stain on the center of the sensor. I wonder whether this is real or someone trying to create doubt about buying Pentax:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=37101214