D
dickinsonjon
Guest
In researching my final choice of camera after my recent DSLR cul-de-sac, I've pretty much come down to the GX100 and the Panny LX2(so much cheaper to buy than the dlux3 in the UK). I'm more or less settled on the GX100 in terms of files, ergonomics and focal length preferences, but I keep reading about the 'dust problem'. Now, I know you can catch any disease you like if you go on the internet, and dust 'problems' are apparently the bane of many camera owners, and apparently GX100 owners especially, as it requires a return-to-base repair.
But.... I wonder if it's really that bad, so I thought I'd ask the question of you folks here as I have great respect for you as a group of real-life small camera users. Wouter I know you have had bother with dust in your camera, anyone else got any experiences? And just how bad actually was it? My main worry is that the internet will put me off buying what is otherwise a stunning tool for what I want to do with my photography, and I am inclined to just stop worrying about it and get on with it. Should I, shouldn't I? And one final question, are other cameras just as bad but we don't really hear about them? The DL3/LX2?
Cheers
JD
But.... I wonder if it's really that bad, so I thought I'd ask the question of you folks here as I have great respect for you as a group of real-life small camera users. Wouter I know you have had bother with dust in your camera, anyone else got any experiences? And just how bad actually was it? My main worry is that the internet will put me off buying what is otherwise a stunning tool for what I want to do with my photography, and I am inclined to just stop worrying about it and get on with it. Should I, shouldn't I? And one final question, are other cameras just as bad but we don't really hear about them? The DL3/LX2?
Cheers
JD