Dale Allyn
New member
The review M.R. had said was coming.
It references the LX-3 from time to time as well. The G10 shows rather strong in this comparison with the P6000, especially regarding CA/fringing and resolution (referring to image sharpness, not the sensor resolution). The lack of live histogram on the P6000 would disappoint me, since I'm a histogram addict and rarely, if ever, concern myself with the image appearance on the screen.
In my opinion, there's still no perfect model out there, but the lower ISO images from the G10 are looking pretty darn good. This review might help a couple of my friends to make a choice. I'd like to see something with the G10's image quality in a slightly smaller package (with a good optical VF), but I want a lot of things.
It references the LX-3 from time to time as well. The G10 shows rather strong in this comparison with the P6000, especially regarding CA/fringing and resolution (referring to image sharpness, not the sensor resolution). The lack of live histogram on the P6000 would disappoint me, since I'm a histogram addict and rarely, if ever, concern myself with the image appearance on the screen.
In my opinion, there's still no perfect model out there, but the lower ISO images from the G10 are looking pretty darn good. This review might help a couple of my friends to make a choice. I'd like to see something with the G10's image quality in a slightly smaller package (with a good optical VF), but I want a lot of things.
Last edited: