Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
HI Uwe>Not sure anymore ....
Could you give any argument?
Similar as Jono I had so many top-end P&S's and most of them are gone and replaced by the next great and best ....>Not sure anymore ....
Could you give any argument?
THe same here.I'm looking at it as a carry-everywhere. The iPhone has been that camera but the RX-100 is about the same size and offers what I often need that the iPhone doesn't have...zoom lens, low light ability, etc.
This pretty well sums it up for me too, it is no match for a good DSLR, but as an 'always in my pocket' or car, cycle or whatever, it does a good job, better than my LX3/5.It's more capable than a carry anywhere might imply, although it is without a doubt a great carry anywhere. In absolute terms, the image quality is excellent. The menu's are better than on a NEX. Sony are on a roll right now.
I don't usually do video but I am planning on using it to video an upcoming event I am hosting for Seed Academy at Google Campus this Wednesday.
You were pretty satisfied with the Nikon V1, I thought. The RX100 has a slightly better IQ, better resolution, better dof control and all in a shirt pocket size form. Versatility and maybe a tad faster AF speak for the Nikon. However, for a sytem camera, the Nikon's IQ falls a little short of what I'd consider "good enough", whereas the RX100 sets the new benchmark in the shirt pocket size category, by country miles that is. Snaps from yesterday as I was walking to a business meeting (no picture or smart phone ones would have been the alternative before I had the tiny Sony).Similar as Jono I had so many top-end P&S's and most of them are gone and replaced by the next great and best ....
Also while looking at the images posted from the RX100, the colors do not look so nicely overall to me. Maybe I am used too much to Olympus colors or Leica colors nowadays.
Despite of that the RX100 is a great camera for sure and summarizes lot of great features which a P&S today should cover. But I fear I would only use it for very short before it would stay at home again, waiting for the next even better camera.
The X2, although a pretty different concept, gets more and more interesting for me. The more often I visualize how I could do a shot, the more I come to the conclusion that the X2 would (could) be the best tool for this in the range of high end P&S. I would love somebody talk me out of that
Right I was very happy with the V1, but I decided to give the OMD a try, as it is much closer to photography IMHO and IP is much better than from V1, also AF is almost as fast. Maybe with a V2 and some faster lenses for the Nikon 1 system I would revert back. Maybe we will see the RX100 sensor in a V2 soon?You were pretty satisfied with the Nikon V1, I thought. The RX100 has a slightly better IQ, better resolution, better dof control and all in a shirt pocket size form. Versatility and maybe a tad faster AF speak for the Nikon. However, for a sytem camera, the Nikon's IQ falls a little short of what I'd consider "good enough", whereas the RX100 sets the new benchmark in the shirt pocket size category, by country miles that is. Snaps from yesterday as I was walking to a business meeting (no picture or smart phone ones would have been the alternative before I had the tiny Sony).