Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I have NR off no matter what. I like the noise it makes at high iso.hi lili,
it is very rare. they did give the dp1 a nine and flunked it in every other department. this is a very good sign for the ep1.
wayne
www.pbase.com/wwp
ps. reading a bit more of their conclusion, it doesn't seem like a camera for a neophyte. more like for don, people who've had a lot of experience with cameras.
Not common, but the Canon 5D2 and the Nikon D3X are 9.5 -- as they ought to be.They gave it a '9' in image quality, I don't recall them ever giving any camera that high a score!
They gave it a '9' in image quality, I don't recall them ever giving any camera that high a score!
They also gave the Nikon 990 a '9' years ago. Their scoring system seems a bit odd -- I can't work out any obvious relationship. [A bit like nowadays when no cameras seem to be 'below average']Not common, but the Canon 5D2 and the Nikon D3X are 9.5 -- as they ought to be.
The ratings are based on what is currently on the market today. So a camera that got a 9 back then would not get the same rating today. Also, the reason generally stated for not a lot of bad reviews is also selectivity in what they review. Generally they don't touch the dud cameras and I think most of the dslrs launched do a great job the nuances come out in the writing.They also gave the Nikon 990 a '9' years ago. Their scoring system seems a bit odd -- I can't work out any obvious relationship. [A bit like nowadays when no cameras seem to be 'below average']
Fair point, but I'm never quite sure if they rate all cameras together at any time, or whether '9' for the E-P1 is a comparison with others in its class -- if it has any competitors that is. Is it relative or absolute?The ratings are based on what is currently on the market today. So a camera that got a 9 back then would not get the same rating today. Also, the reason generally stated for not a lot of bad reviews is also selectivity in what they review. Generally they don't touch the dud cameras and I think most of the dslrs launched do a great job the nuances come out in the writing.
So I take it, that he's not a great resource for you.....hmmm can't imagine why...David Pogue again shows the incredible shallow depth on his knowledge pool. I hope no one gets killed diving in head first...
Yeah, go figure. Maybe it is comments like this:So I take it, that he's not a great resource for you.....hmmm can't imagine why...
Oh geeze...all this time I thought the light beams were slow and that created the blurrrrrr...hmm never realized it was "The Sensor Problem".....Yeah, go figure. Maybe it is comments like this:
"Far too many pictures come out blurry, because the sensor inside is so tiny."