The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Pogue on the A55

monza

Active member
Sony Raises Camera Feats to New Level
By DAVID POGUE
When it made up the term “S.L.R.,” the technology terminology industry was not operating at its peak creative powers.

An S.L.R. is one of those big, black, professional-style cameras. They do things that make pocket cameras look like pretenders: they can blur the background, take lower-light shots without a flash and shoot with no shutter lag (the delay after you press the shutter button). And thanks to enormous light sensors and lenses, the photos just look fantastic.

But ouch — that name. Even if you know what S.L.R. stands for (“single-lens reflex”), you have no idea what it means. “Single lens” is misleading, because the whole point of these cameras is that you can attach dozens of different lenses. And to most people, “reflex” refers only to wincing when they see the price.

Kidding aside, historically, there was a point to the term “single-lens reflex” (yes, I use Wikipedia, too). It describes the mirrors and prisms inside that bend the light from the lens to your eye.

Recently, a new generation of mirrorless cameras have hit the market. They look and work like S.L.R.’s — interchangeable lenses, no shutter lag and so on — but they’re smaller and they capture high-definition video. (Since they’re not technically S.L.R.’s anymore, Popular Photography magazine proposes the term I.L.C. for them, for “interchangeable-lens compacts.” Let’s run with it.)

Sony’s new Alpha A55 camera, available in October ($850 with 3X zoom lens), is an S.L.R. — sorry, an I.L.C. — that changes a bunch of games at once. It accepts any of Sony’s existing 33 Alpha lenses, but its radically different guts give it talents no other camera has had before.

This will require a paragraph or two of technical slogging, but you’ll feel rosy and smart when it’s over.

In a typical S.L.R., light from the lens hits a mirror, which bounces light up to your eye and onto a focusing sensor. The blessing: you see what the lens sees. The curse: when you take the actual photo, the mirror has to flip out of the way so that the light falls on the main image sensor (the “film”). For that fraction of a second, the camera can’t focus. If someone or something is hurtling toward you, a typical S.L.R. may have trouble keeping rapid-fire shots in focus.

That’s also why most S.L.R.’s can’t change focus when you’re shooting video. If you start filming on something close up, and then pan to something across the room, the video goes out of focus.

Still with me?

All right. Sony’s A55 camera adopts a new spin on a decades-old photographic idea: the mirror is translucent. It splits light between the focusing sensor and the image sensor — all the time. The mirror never has to flip up to take a picture, so the autofocus never goes blind when you take a shot.

As a result, the camera can shoot an incredible 10 shots a second, refocusing all the way. Sony says no other camera in the world can do that.

The camera also shoots beautiful, high-definition video — and it can change focus as you pan the camera, gorgeously and cinematically.

Very few S.L.R.’s, or even I.L.C.’s, can do that trick, refocusing while filming.

But the Sony doesn’t just change focus in video. It changes focus fast. According to Sony, the A55 is the first camera — or camcorder, for that matter — to use what’s called phase-detection focusing for video. (Other cameras, and all camcorders, use a slower system called contrast detection.) That’s only possible because, in this camera, the autofocus sensor can see the scene all the time.

Now, to pull off this unusual design, something had to go, and it was the optical viewfinder. When you hold this camera to your eye, you’re basically looking at a tiny TV screen in the eyepiece, rather then peering out through the glass of the lens. In other words, it’s an electronic viewfinder.

Photographers usually pooh-pooh electronic viewfinders, because no screen is as sharp as real life. But Sony’s viewfinder is extremely big, bright and sharp (how does 1.4 million pixels strike you?). And having a screen in the eyepiece gives you all kinds of advantages you don’t get when you’re just looking through glass.

For example, you can see exactly what effect your settings will have before you take the shot (white balance, exposure, focus, and so on). You can summon digital overlays in the viewfinder, including a horizon level. You can magnify the scene up to 15 times for precise manual focusing. You can play back your photos right in the viewfinder — a rare, surprisingly handy feature, especially when you’re experimenting with settings or reviewing your photos in bright sunlight (which washes out the screen somewhat).

You can shoot video with the camera to your face, too, a more stable way of holding the camera. (Most S.L.R.’s require you to look at the screen on the back to shoot video.)

The best part is that these gee-whiz features are part of a generally terrific camera. It has Sony’s Sweep Panorama mode, where you swing your arm in an arc as the camera snaps away — and then, two seconds later, the camera displays an automatically assembled, stunning 260-degree panoramic photo. The quality is fantastic, although it’s auto-mode only.

The A55 also creates high-dynamic range photos automatically — a neat trick by which it restores detail from areas that are too bright or too dark by superimposing three photos with different exposures.

There’s a built-in stereo microphone for use with your video, plus a mike jack. The button placement is excellent — especially the dedicated Video Record button (no switching modes when filmic inspiration strikes). The tilting, rotating, flip-out screen lets you shoot over your head, at knee level or even self-portraits. You can also fold the screen flush against the camera (with either screen in, for protection, or screen out).

I was so confident in the A55’s ability not to muff photo ops that I did a risky thing: I used it as the sole recording device for my son’s one and only sixth birthday party. Happy ending — the ratio of winner shots to losers was amazingly high. Even the low-light candle-blowing moment looks fantastic in video, like a Scorsese shot it. (Have a look at the sample photos that accompany this column.

Now, there are a few flies in the ointment. That 10-frames-a-second mode requires a lot of light; indoors, these superburst-mode photos are sometimes too dim, and you can’t adjust the aperture in this mode.

The camera is small and light compared with true S.L.R.’s, but it’s still much bulkier than, for example, Sony’s own minuscule NEX-5 (the smallest of this type in the world, although you give up a lot of features — like a flash, a mode dial and a wide choice of lenses).

There are two separate playback modes, one each for stills and videos, and it’s annoying to have to switch between them. Battery life is about 350 shots a charge, which could be better. And some of the fancy modes (like high dynamic range) require a lot of processing after each shot, during which time you can’t use the camera.

Still, this camera takes pictures and videos as well as anything in its price range — and, in some cases, better than far more expensive equipment. (A sibling camera, the A33, is available now for $100 less. It gives you 7 frames a second instead of 10, and 14 megapixels instead of 16; it also does away with the GPS chip that tags each photo with your location.)

Even more exciting, it’s thrilling to see Sony finding its mojo again, introducing radical new design ideas that, in this case, really advance the state of the art.

In other words, maybe the right term for this camera is neither S.L.R. nor I.L.C. Maybe it’s really an E.S.F. (exciting step forward).

*
*
 

jonoslack

Active member
Hi There
Thanks for posting this.
With a bunch of Sony A mount lenses it's hard to resist this . . and if David likes it - well it must be irresistable :ROTFL:

I actually have some use for one next weekend - I was going to wait for the A55, but I really don't need 10fps, and I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be as well to get an A33 (available now) and then hang on for the A77 or A99 next year.
 

roweraay

New member
I actually have some use for one next weekend - I was going to wait for the A55, but I really don't need 10fps, and I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be as well to get an A33 (available now) and then hang on for the A77 or A99 next year.
I personally am resisting the urge to get an A33 and I am currently waiting for the A55. After all, it is just a matter of 3-4 weeks.

I have a trip planned to one of our Asia-Pac plants in November, and hope to pick up one of these puppies before I head out....both for HD video and also for stills.
 

dhsimmonds

New member
I am with Jono.....I think that I will wait until next year by which time hopefully the A77 and/or A99 may be available. The A99 for full frame potential and both if Sony retain the pro features of the A700 and A900.

Jono I know that you jumped the gun with the NEX and may have with the A33 but at least you will get probably a year of shooting with the A33? :ROTFL:

The A700 is well overdue for replacement and the A77 or whatever it's labelled will be a cracker in my view. It will have to be if it is to better the A700!

Perhaps Leica management were very wise in canning the R10 and the whole of their non MF reflex production. :rolleyes:
 

roweraay

New member
I got my A55 and the 35mm f/1.8 lens yesterday. Very light and highly portable. Addresses some of the issues I had with my prior (sold) NEX5.
 

jonoslack

Active member
Jono I know that you jumped the gun with the NEX and may have with the A33 but at least you will get probably a year of shooting with the A33? :ROTFL:
HI There
I've just been shooting with the A33 and the 50f1.4 in a dark and very dismal church (wedding practice). It really works awfully well, focusing in very low light is lightning quick, and (I hardly dare say it) the face recognition is really good!.

I really don't regret selling the NEX for the little A33, and although I would have bought the A55, I'm not sure that I'll be missing much.

As for a year of shooting? who can say, but I'm pretty sure that it's a keeper with the 16-80.
 

roweraay

New member
As for a year of shooting? who can say, but I'm pretty sure that it's a keeper with the 16-80.
I think it is the "light-ness" and the "small ness" of the A55 that I value. Even if a future A77 appears, it will expectedly be a much larger/heavier beast. So I guess I will be just fine and keep using my A55. :)
 
A

Andrea Buso

Guest
HI There
I've just been shooting with the A33 and the 50f1.4 in a dark and very dismal church (wedding practice). It really works awfully well, focusing in very low light is lightning quick, and (I hardly dare say it) the face recognition is really good!.

I really don't regret selling the NEX for the little A33, and although I would have bought the A55, I'm not sure that I'll be missing much.

As for a year of shooting? who can say, but I'm pretty sure that it's a keeper with the 16-80.
Good to hear that Jono.
I'm getting an a55 next week when I get back to NY.
I'm planning of using it with the 50mm 1.4 and the 20mm 2.8 mostly.

I tried one in Tokyo last week and loved it. A part for .....maybe a little too small even for my regular size hands.

I tried it with kit zoom which seemed pretty sharp for a kit lens and with the 85mm 2.8, which is quite nice for a plastic lens. nice bokhe too.
 

jonoslack

Active member
Good to hear that Jono.
I'm getting an a55 next week when I get back to NY.
I'm planning of using it with the 50mm 1.4 and the 20mm 2.8 mostly.

I tried one in Tokyo last week and loved it. A part for .....maybe a little too small even for my regular size hands.

I tried it with kit zoom which seemed pretty sharp for a kit lens and with the 85mm 2.8, which is quite nice for a plastic lens. nice bokhe too.
Hi Andrea
I'm sure you'll enjoy it - just a small update. The real wedding was on Saturday, and the light was ghastly - then it got dark. Emma had the A33, set on P with autoISO and WB with the Sony/Zeiss 16-80, and she just snapped away - she thought it was really good fun, and every shot was technically useable (and lots of them are, indeed, being used)
She isn't one for new cameras, so it's tribute indeed that it's so easy and nice to use. It really FEELS fast as well.
 

BackToSlr

New member
Hi Andrea
She isn't one for new cameras, so it's tribute indeed that it's so easy and nice to use. It really FEELS fast as well.
Thanks for the update Jono. I had similar experience in my ever so brief test or A33. People underestimate how fast the AF tracking is, and how big a paradigm shift it is to track continuously, and not lose the tracking on mirror-up. Simply a marvelous idea. I think it is already faster than 7D in tracking, whereas focus acquisition is not as quick as 7D/A700, tracking is simply brilliant! eer

Looks like A55 is in stock on Sonystyle, if it is in stock in Sonystyle store, i may just get one today...

Cheers!

N
 
A

Andrea Buso

Guest
Got an a55 early this week in NY. They are in stock at the Sony store midtown.
Kits and body only.
I believe they may soon get in stock a bit everywhere.

At the SonyStyle South Korea they have sold all the a55 stock they had, online only and within a day or two.
 
Top