ustein
Contributing Editor
No, but my type of processing of course (e.g. local contrast).Uwe,
Very nice compositions. Did you use some HDR processing for these?
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
No, but my type of processing of course (e.g. local contrast).Uwe,
Very nice compositions. Did you use some HDR processing for these?
Thanks Matt, did not realize that. Great news.Uwe: I like the first one (a lot better then a Gursky!). Sparsely elegant.
Carl: Both of these are excellent. Compositionally similar.
Endre: Welcome. Lightroom supports the files, as of several weeks ago: Vers. 3.5, Camera Raw 6.5. Does a great job, IMHO.
Neil: I was also surprised how good that lens was. Nice photo.
Cheers, Matt
http://mdriscoll.zenfolio.com
Uwe: Yes, sir. The Twin Trees is the one. :thumb up:> I like the first one (a lot better then a Gursky!). Sparsely elegant.
Do you mean the Twin Trees? I love them. We have many shots of them.
Hi TerryThe 28-90 intrigues me. Can you post a picture of it next to a well known lens?
Thanks.
Hi There TerryThe 28-90 intrigues me. Can you post a picture of it next to a well known lens?
Thanks.
I did use the appropriate emoticon.Jono: Thanks.
Terry: "It is only money." Very sanguine of you.
Cheers, Matt
http://mdriscoll.zenfolio.com
HI TomHi Jono,
do you feel its really worth it to mount such big lenses on a Nex?
I think if I were you I would rather use them on the A77 with Leitax adapters.
And did you by any chance compare them to the Nex lenses (I dont doubt the Leicas are better but I am interested how much)
Regards, Tom
Yes, you did.I did use the appropriate emoticon.