Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Interesting statement, you're technically correct but I think the difference between your rhetorical question and a declaration is not awfully large.Then you should not have a problem with me if you correct your reading of a question as "declaration".
Read post #8. I happened to have looked at the features of the models in a bit more detail because they matter to me.Secondly you didn't address my second (and in my mind more important) issue with your OP, but maybe silence is concurrance
Why don't you follow your own advice and be happy, buying and changing lenses and bodies faster than dirty underwear isn't going to make you any happier unless you're a gear geek.:bugeyes:Good for you! Be happy!
I still don't see what the big deal is: As originally shipped, the NEX-3 and 5 were clearly conceived as "lifestyle" products, and I think Sony was not expecting so many advanced users! Nevertheless, they greatly improved the firmware for the earlier cameras, shipped the NEX-7 and 24/1.8 Zeiss lens, and have a "G" zoom on the way. That's a pretty quick turnabout I think.As long as Sony is trying to emulate Samsung (NX -> NEX, wifi -> wifi, 180 flip screen for self portrait,.....), not much winding either way is going to happen?
No kidding, and both of those are expected this year, so we'll see soon enough (although I think the 35mm will be f1.8.)
I think your sole purpose here appears to be to harrass me. I have no clue who you are and I would ask you to leave me and my posts alone. Thanks. I am not too enthusiastic to be posting here under these circumstances.Why don't you follow your own advice and be happy, buying and changing lenses and bodies faster than dirty underwear isn't going to make you any happier unless you're a gear geek.:bugeyes:
+1, and I don't remember a difference between my 5N and 7 EVF.kit laughlin, i have never had issues focusing the dioptor on the 5n external viewfinder. Is it possible that your nex7 one is not calibrated properly? From the spec the nex 5n evf accessory is the same spec as the nex 7 built in evf.
My evf is so clear and easy to view, I find myself frequently reviewing my images through the evf rather than the lcd.
In one way I agree that it is important to have the right lenses for the task and those with the right quality. But then the next question would be: how many different lenses does one really "need"?This talks about bodies vs lenses:
The Chicken and the Egg | Sans Mirror ? mirrorless, interchangeable lens cameras | Thom Hogan
.
No kidding. I constantly see this argument for the Canon DSLR system, but I only use 3-4 focal lengths max on any system.In one way I agree that it is important to have the right lenses for the task and those with the right quality. But then the next question would be: how many different lenses does one really "need"?