Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Lovely.Congratulations Joe...I wish we could see more of your IR work here...Cheers Barry
Taken earlier this afternoon....Colour blended with a split toned image.
Many thanks David...Just opacity layers in Photoshop with dodging/erasing and burning in.Lovely.
May I as what you are using for blending software? Or are you just using Photoshop layers?
Thanks for the kind words, Wener and I feel likewise the same about your work.Thank's Louis,
for me the 16-35 ZE is a fanatic lens! Optically very good it's range is very useful.
I have quite a few primes in that range (Zeiss 18 + 21, Canon 24 TSE II, Nikon 15, Leica 35/1,4)but in most cases i would not hesitate to give the 16-35 the shot.
I have posted many pic's here and at FM with that lens (may i point to my Flickr site...)
Your work is alway great and inspiring for me.
Cheers
Werner
Louis, just my 2p worth if it helps - I wholeheartedly agree with Werner, likewise I have owned that lens in the past (Panasonic version of the 7-14mm) on my old GH2 and as nice as it was. It’s not quite in the same league as the 16-35mm – I don’t regret selling the WATE in the least, other than the money lost from the sale.Thanks for the kind words, Wener and I feel likewise the same about your work.
I am in two minds about the 16-35. I love UWA lenses. I currently own the 21 Ultron (an amazing lens) and the Heliar 15/4.5.
I used to own the Lumix 7-14 on my m43rds kit and it was a great lens to work with. So, I do have experience of UWA zooms.
You and Barry Haines keep posting very good exemplars of the lens.
LouisB
Fantastic photos Werner - excellent!" Dirty Work "