I read the instructions on image loading several times and still got a tiny image after futzing around with the interface for 15 minutes, or so with lots of img code etc. Apparently you have to have the image show first at full size or something. [You can manage final page load sizes via a new page setting up, a 'page break'.]
That is why I haven't posted images since my allocation ran out even for the tiny pics, lol, I got a red strip now. It really ought to be easier, I think.
It is important to image-oriented sites/threads, because a lot of images look pretty underwhelming at the tiny size, and viewers need to ask themselves: do I want to make several more server calls just to see this tiny photo blown up to viewing size, then return back? Most won't and don't, just scroll on by. Me too.
If you click the thumbnails, it's not like you get an straight 1200x800 image, rather a box shows up as a border with arrows accessing more images if more are loaded into the t'nails, you can click to remove the box - it's another interface...people just want to to be able to load and view with ease.
Just my experience and opinion, I am not sore about it, I am still thankful others have it figured out and I can see and enjoy their work.