Barry Haines
Active member
(DOUBLE POST)Well we are all waiting for your test results folks. ITs YOUR turn to tell me. LOL
Seriously if I had the cash it be in my hands.
I have the Canon TSE 17 and 24. 50 ZA 1.4 and 85 1.4 ZA for the A7r my need is the Minolta 200mm 2.8 High Speed and this dang 16-35 and I am in business.
Than the A77II i have the Sigma 18-35 1.8 and use the 50 and 85 but again that Minolta 200mm would be handy as heck here too.
For those interested I made up today a few Leica WATE and Sony 16-35mm test comparison images at various apertures on a close up planar subject (full size)...You can draw your own conclusions but do bear in mind these are for a 2 dimensional planar subject...Handheld OSS on...You can see the colour shift corners of the Leica WATE and that it vignettes more than the Sony 16-35mm....The vignetting and colour shift can be corrected with a profile...Cheers Barry.
(Don't shoot the messenger if you don't like what you see)...All SOOC jpgs no PP.
FLICKR GALLERY...LEICA (WATE) 16-21mm F4 + SONY 16-35mm F4 FE
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54602555@N08/sets/72157649315551921/