Please assist me to better understand what and where Sony is going With image stabilization.
I own both an A7 and an Olympus E-M5. The Olympus has the 5 axis IBIS which is terrific because None of the Olympus M43 lens have Any image stabilization built in.
I also have the Sony FE 55mm (not stabilized, and I really haven't found that I needed any), plus the 24-70mm & the 70-200mm (both have OSS).
My question is why is Sony building lens with OSS if they are also including IBIS built into the camera body( A7 II) ?
Don't you have to turn off either the image stabilization in either the lens or the camera body? That's what I need to do when I use a Panosonic lens on my Olympic M43 camera body.
Is Sony confused and charging the consumer for features that aren't needed?
I own both an A7 and an Olympus E-M5. The Olympus has the 5 axis IBIS which is terrific because None of the Olympus M43 lens have Any image stabilization built in.
I also have the Sony FE 55mm (not stabilized, and I really haven't found that I needed any), plus the 24-70mm & the 70-200mm (both have OSS).
My question is why is Sony building lens with OSS if they are also including IBIS built into the camera body( A7 II) ?
Don't you have to turn off either the image stabilization in either the lens or the camera body? That's what I need to do when I use a Panosonic lens on my Olympic M43 camera body.
Is Sony confused and charging the consumer for features that aren't needed?