Sony 70-200 f4 vs Olympus 50-200 SWD f/2.8-3.5
I bought an Olympus EM-1 with the 12-40 f/2.8 and Olympus 50-200 SWD f/2.8-3.5 2-3 months ago, because I thought Iíd enjoy a simple kit with only 2 lenses. I got all 3 items for a decent price, so Iíll probably can sell them for the same price (or probably a small profit) so itís not a big deal, but the camera doesnít work for me. I realized that I vastly prefer manual focus on shorter FLs and, I canít point my finger on it, just prefer the look of my NEX pics in comparison to the EM1/12-40 combo.
I miss shooting with my M-mount lenses on my NEX-6, so Iím going to sell the EM1 with the lenses as well as my NEX-6 and buy a A7 II instead (I should have done that right awayÖ).
The problem is that Iíll lose my only lens with a FL higher than 90mm. The EM-1 and 50-200 combo is way too expensive to keep (especially because I want to buy a Voigtlšnder 21mm f/1.8) , so Iíll need a replacement for this lens. The only problem is that the 50-200 is quite the stunner and Iíd like a similar lens for the A7 II.
I havenít found any written comparisons between Sony and Olympus lenses. The best thing I found was Steve Huffs article ďOlympus E-M1 with 40-150 f/2.8 vs Sony A7s with 70-200 f/4Ē, but Iíd like more than one opinion on the lens.
Btw, has anyone found a decent 1.4ish tele converter for the Sony lens (and I donít mean an APS-C camera^^)?