I will not be getting the 85 because I am happy with my Batis 85 at present and it's already big enough for the A7RII.
The 24-70 is tempting only because my current f4 version is not sharp enough for me and my Canon 2.8 is not being used much given I need an adapter for it. I did use it in the past with my Canon FF bodies but over the past 2 yrs I've gradually stopped using Canon for anything other than wildlife.
So for landscapes, travel and family stuff, it is just the Sony now (sadly even my Pentax 645 hasn't seen much use since the A7RII arrived). Which means the new 24-70 will be very attractive. The only issue is that I have three excellent primes that cover this particular focal range - the Batis 25, the 55 1.8 and the Batis 85. So it will be a question of whether I want to switch from primes to a single zoom, albeit with equally good IQ. Then there is the heft issue, granted it will replace my three primes in the bag, but on camera it will be a beast to lug around. No longer the discreet small camera shooting, now I will look like anybody else with a big DSLR and a monster lens on it.
I am sure everyone realizes it but few give it a second thought - hard to escape notice if you've got a huge camera/lens pointed at a person in the street.
Finally, the 70-200. Definitely not getting this one - for now. To me this would primarily be a wildlife lens, although I can see pros using this for that beautiful bokeh at 200mm in a head and shoulders portrait of the subject taken outdoors.
I have the f4 version from Canon and it works for me quite well. IF Sony comes up with a new body that may potentially replace the Canon in terms of AF, frame rate etc then I may consider this along with the new body. Would still need to keep the Canon body for the beyond 200mm needs, but I am guessing that in the next 2-3 years I will be an ALL-Sony man.
So, in a nutshell, 85 No, 24-70 likely, 70-200 no unless a 'compatible' body shows up from Sony.