... please give me your suggestions.
As a young photographer I had a Leica M4 with 28, 35, and 90mm wide aperture lenses.
I loved having it for personal photography.
We had Nikon with a wide selection of lenses, Hasselblad with wide to medium tele options along with view cameras ranging from 4x5 to 8x10. So camera options was not a problem.
Now, after years shooting Canon, then a brief romance with Fuji system including X-Pro1 and TX-1, I now have Sony A7RII cameras and a variety of lenses ranging from 16-35 to 120-300 Sigma with MC-11 adapter. All my lenses are zooms. I had some primes but sold them because they didn't get used much.
I wonder about the A6500 with some primes that are equivalent with my Leica trio. Or, a similar trio of primes that fit the A7RII.
I have to admit, when thinking about going with something that is APS-C, the larger format and pixel count is compelling.
Thoughts? Please?
As a young photographer I had a Leica M4 with 28, 35, and 90mm wide aperture lenses.
I loved having it for personal photography.
We had Nikon with a wide selection of lenses, Hasselblad with wide to medium tele options along with view cameras ranging from 4x5 to 8x10. So camera options was not a problem.
Now, after years shooting Canon, then a brief romance with Fuji system including X-Pro1 and TX-1, I now have Sony A7RII cameras and a variety of lenses ranging from 16-35 to 120-300 Sigma with MC-11 adapter. All my lenses are zooms. I had some primes but sold them because they didn't get used much.
I wonder about the A6500 with some primes that are equivalent with my Leica trio. Or, a similar trio of primes that fit the A7RII.
I have to admit, when thinking about going with something that is APS-C, the larger format and pixel count is compelling.
Thoughts? Please?