Seldom have I read a well argued article on 'fine art' and the likes of Gursky than Roger's apology for not being one of the 'luvvies' and enjoying fame and riches.
I can relate.
P.s. no sour grapes to Andreas Gursky and his ilk who make the big bucks. Creating and defining a movement vs. simply copying a style deserves total respect (I have his books myself too and appreciate his work. Ditto Stephen Shore, William Eggleston et al) I just can't stomach the work that they have to do to get recognition.