Site Sponsors
Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast
Results 401 to 450 of 534

Thread: "Capturing Infrared"

  1. #401
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy Flood View Post
    swamp-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr
    Cindy, LOVE this image!!! Crop a wee bit off the bottom, print it B I G, frame it and hang it!
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  2. #402
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy Flood View Post
    College of Charleston
    A6000, 590nm
    And I keep coming back to this one too -- really spectacular, love the net color and mood!
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  3. #403
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    ...The Sony Zeiss 35/1.4 and 55/1.8 both work great for IR photography.

    The Batis lenses are outstanding otherwise.
    I'm getting hot spots with the Sony-Zeiss 35mm f/1.4. I'll have to give it another try. I've been using the 24-70mm f/4 primarily for [665nm] IR.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  4. #404
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Thank you, Jack.

    Thanks Tre and Joe for the lens hot spot information.
    It is a shame about the Batis lenses.
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #405
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    I'm getting hot spots with the Sony-Zeiss 35mm f/1.4. I'll have to give it another try. I've been using the 24-70mm f/4 primarily for [665nm] IR.

    Joe
    What type of filters are you using? The last few pics that I posted at Yates Mill are taken with the 35 Distagon with either IR590 (color IR) or IR850 (B&W IT) on it. I don't see any hot spots on my copy but all of my shots were taken between f/2.5-f/9. I'm using Kolari Vision branded filters.

    UPDATE: It appears the 25 Batis may be useable with the 590nm or 850nm filter while fairly wide open. I have to do more testing to see how much one could get away with. The hot spot is fairly faint and small in a centralized area. The 85 has a large hotspot so it's pretty unusable IMO so far in most IR photography.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  6. #406
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    What type of filters are you using? The last few pics that I posted at Yates Mill are taken with the 35 Distagon with either IR590 (color IR) or IR850 (B&W IT) on it. I don't see any hot spots on my copy but all of my shots were taken between f/2.5-f/9. I'm using Kolari Vision branded filters.

    UPDATE: It appears the 25 Batis may be useable with the 590nm or 850nm filter while fairly wide open. I have to do more testing to see how much one could get away with. The hot spot is fairly faint and small in a centralized area. The 85 has a large hotspot so it's pretty unusable IMO so far in most IR photography.
    Tre, I'm shooting with a LifePixel converted a7R, with their 665nm "Enhanced Color" option, so no [external] filters. I hadn't seen your Yates Mill shots until just now. Well done. It's one of my favorite subjects, for IR or otherwise as you can see here.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #407
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    Tre, I'm shooting with a LifePixel converted a7R, with their 665nm "Enhanced Color" option, so no [external] filters. I hadn't seen your Yates Mill shots until just now. Well done. It's one of my favorite subjects, for IR or otherwise as you can see here.

    Joe
    Thanks Joe.

    I'm shooting on the LifePixel A7R converted to Full Spectrum (although I was very tempted with the Super Color/ Super Blue options) for the flexibility. I imagine I wouldn't want much more than 36 megapixels for printing so I went ahead converted it to Full Spectrum and just keep my lenses to common filter sizes as much as a I can. Right now it's all 49mm, 67mm, and 72mm lenses.

    Oh and I like Yates Mill too since I discovered it about 3 years ago... I try to take all of my new lenses there to shoot at some point to see what they can do. Generally can get some pretty good clouds there as well for IR.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  8. #408
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Couple questions for you IR folks ---

    I have a Sony A7r. I generally dislike the system -- wanted to love it but it just doesn't work for me. BUT, with this thread it does seem an ideal cam to convert to full spectrum since it is sensor view and can take about any lens, so maybe I can still find a use for it -- fact is I can't sell it for beans now anyway so why not?

    My plan is shooting full spectrum for converting to mono, and then may shoot with the deep red 60 for brighter false-color. Is this a good strategy?

    Next question is lens -- is the Sony 24-70 worth the money for a dedicated full-spectrum Cam, and/or does it hot-spot? (We should have a lens IR suitability thread here maybe?) If it were under $800, I wouldn't even ask, I'd just buy it and go with it as good enough. But it's slow, apparently weak at each end, and friggin expensive at $1200. (C'mon Sony, really???) I like the idea of reasonable AF with the cam, so that leaves most obvious lens choices out. My other option is the 28 AF and call it done.

    Finally, as an alternative I do have the Metabones Nikon adapter and a bunch of N glass, but then it's back to manual focus. Probably not a huge deal, especially for this application, but then I'd like AF if it worked well on full spectrum...

    Appreciate any comments.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  9. #409
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    jack, shooting IR with the a7R is a great strategy. I don't shoot full spectrum because I have an aversion to carrying filters and trying keep up with them, especially with different lens filter sizes. So I went with the LifePixel 665nm conversion and have been happy with it.

    I use the FE 24-70mm almost exclusively, having experienced hot spot issues with other FE lenses. Tre is probably a better source of information on lens compatibility than I am. The 24-70mm is a good, not great, general purpose zoom that you can find on Fred Miranda or eBay at a reasonable price (used, not new).

    I'm working on an article for my blog on IR photography with the a7R that I will publish in the next few days. It's not a tutorial, but will have some tips and resource links that might prove helpful. Stay tuned.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  10. #410
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Joe, how are the mono conversions from 665 as compared to full spectrum? Thanks for the 24-70 info. Unfortunately I cannot access FM -- Fred is a strange guy and blocked both Guy and I permanently the day we launched GetDPI But if there is somebody over there with one at a really good price, please steer them my way! In the meantime, I'll check eBay...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  11. #411
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tucson/Carmel/Jackson Hole
    Posts
    4,225
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Jack, I’ve gone just about round the world in IR conversions similar to a dog chasing his tail. My first conversion was on a Canon 1Ds II in 720nm. The conversion was good and I actually got several prints that have sold well. The downside to a DSLR was that I needed a dedicated lens. Then came Guy and his selling of the Sony Nex which turned out to be my first mirrorless camera being converted again to720nm. I picked up a 7r shortly after it was released and that too was converted to capture 720nm for a couple months.

    I sent the 7r back to have it converted once again to full spectrum and am very glad I did. For me the WS has opened up the ability to shoot in just about any spectrum I wish from WS, color by adding a hot mirror filter, and currently 590, 720 and 830nm. I’m currently thinking about adding a 665nm filter to the mix as well. It’s like have several cameras in one just by changing a filter on the lens.

    The great thing about the 7r is that since it’s mirrorless,what you see in the viewfinder or LCD is what the camera sees and what you’ll get in the end. It’s a bit of a PIA onwhite balance however that is solved in C1 (I’ve written a blog or two onshooting IR).

    Regarding lenses; I’ve reduced the Sony lens herd down to2-primary lenses, the 24-70 which works very well and the 50 f/.95 which worksjust as well. Sandy has a 70-200 which Ican also use if I need the extra reach as well as the 90 that I haven’t triedas yet.

    In the end a converted 7r is good for what it does; offers a small lightweight 36-megapixel platform that will capture great IR files. Personally, I feel that any file converted toB&W from IR is above that is converted from a color file.

    Slightly off topic, I had the chance to test/use a Leaf WSand was just as pleased with those files.
    And to throw another thought into the mix, Ken Doo and Ihave been exterminating with flash photography in IR by using the same filteron the flash as we have on the camera. Very interesting results….

    Hope this helps.


    Don Libby
    Iron Creek Photography
    Blog
    Tucson AZ

  12. #412
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Joe, how are the mono conversions from 665 as compared to full spectrum? Thanks for the 24-70 info. Unfortunately I cannot access FM -- Fred is a strange guy and blocked both Guy and I permanently the day we launched GetDPI But if there is somebody over there with one at a really good price, please steer them my way! In the meantime, I'll check eBay...
    Jack, I can't compare b&w conversions with 665nm to full spectrum. With full spectrum you do get the choice of how much (or how little) of the spectrum to pass. I may be sacrificing a little bit of b&w contrast with 665nm, but not much else IMHO.

    I do love the b&w conversions that I've done, and here's one (that I've posted before) simply to demonstrate the potential. Not much processing required.


    I'll keep my eyes open for a mint used FE 24-70mm. They pop up frequently on FM. I didn't realize that you and Guy were on Fred's s**t list. That sucks.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  13. #413
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Joe and Don, thanks for the great feedback.

    This may be hard to believe, but I am only slightly less compulsive than Guy when it comes to making a camera decision and purchase! So the cam is off to LifePixel for a Full Spectrum conversion, I found a decent 24-70 on ebay from a 100% camera seller and it's on its way, and ordered a 67mm B+W 090 deep red, or 590nm filter, 091 deep red/650 and 092/730 ir, all should be ready to assemble in a couple weeks. Probably will also ultimately experiment with UV, but that can wait. Almost ordered a UV/IR cut for normal light, but will likely never bother shooting the cam normal capture anyway

    Again, thanks for the feedback and info!
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #414
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    jack, shooting IR with the a7R is a great strategy. I don't shoot full spectrum because I have an aversion to carrying filters and trying keep up with them, especially with different lens filter sizes. So I went with the LifePixel 665nm conversion and have been happy with it.

    I use the FE 24-70mm almost exclusively, having experienced hot spot issues with other FE lenses. Tre is probably a better source of information on lens compatibility than I am. The 24-70mm is a good, not great, general purpose zoom that you can find on Fred Miranda or eBay at a reasonable price (used, not new).

    I'm working on an article for my blog on IR photography with the a7R that I will publish in the next few days. It's not a tutorial, but will have some tips and resource links that might prove helpful. Stay tuned.

    Joe
    i am using a modified A7R . Recently bought the the new CV 15mm III, but it has a hotspot. My current wide is an old zuiko 24 2.8 , which is ok but subject to lots of vignetting, i am back in market for good compact FE wide lens(es).

    Have any of you with IR modified A7(R) bodies tried the (new this year) Sony 28mm SEL28F20 and its 21mm adapter SonySEL075UWC?

    i wrote to lifepixel to ask their opinion, awaiting their reply

  15. #415
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Mike,

    Welcome to the best photography forum on the net, great first post! Looking forward to hearing LifePixel's reply re the 28 with adapters
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  16. #416
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    jack, shooting IR with the a7R is a great strategy. I don't shoot full spectrum because I have an aversion to carrying filters and trying keep up with them, especially with different lens filter sizes. So I went with the LifePixel 665nm conversion and have been happy with it.

    I use the FE 24-70mm almost exclusively, having experienced hot spot issues with other FE lenses. Tre is probably a better source of information on lens compatibility than I am. The 24-70mm is a good, not great, general purpose zoom that you can find on Fred Miranda or eBay at a reasonable price (used, not new).

    I'm working on an article for my blog on IR photography with the a7R that I will publish in the next few days. It's not a tutorial, but will have some tips and resource links that might prove helpful. Stay tuned.

    Joe

    Jack,

    Don Libby and Cindy Flood are by far the bigger IR Photography experts (despite Joe's gracious comments) compared to myself. They both helped me out a lot through questions and past posts. As far as the 24-70 goes - it works. and it's a great lens to have if you can find it in the $6-800 range. That's what it's worth to me but some find it to be great amongst 24-70's.

    For the most flexibility I recommend the Full Spectrum Conversion. If I wanted the flexibility with color IR then I'd do the Super Color 590nm. You can still put filters on the front and white balance is achieved with a 18% gray card still until you get to IR 720 or higher (I believe) in which case you'd WB with live foliage.

    As for the lenses that I've used on the A7 that worked well for IR - 35 Distagon FE, 55 Sonnar FE, 35 Sigma Art, and Contax Yashica 100/2. Vivek has used the 28/2 on IR and it works well. There are many examples in this thread of what works.

    As far as filters go check out some of the past filter tests in this thread. There are some filters that still allow IR contamination.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  17. #417
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    I use Sigma A 10-20 f/3.5 and Sony 16-35 f/4 on my A6000. I don't have hotspot trouble. I'm hoping to sell my A6000 and convert my A7II to full spectrum. Then I'll stick to 16-35.

    Welcome Mike in Brazil.

    I had foot surgery and am out for a day, and look what happens, Jack Flesher

  18. #418
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy Flood View Post
    I use Sigma A 10-20 f/3.5 and Sony 16-35 f/4 on my A6000. I don't have hotspot trouble. I'm hoping to sell my A6000 and convert my A7II to full spectrum. Then I'll stick to 16-35.

    Welcome Mike in Brazil.

    I had foot surgery and am out for a day, and look what happens, Jack Flesher
    I forgot to mention the 16-35... Don had one and it looked like a great lens on IR. I may need to pick one up eventually.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  19. #419
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tucson/Carmel/Jackson Hole
    Posts
    4,225
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    So far I've used a 16-25, 24-70, 70-200 and the 50 f/.095 all with great success. I've now down sized my lens herd to just 2, the 24-70 and 50mm f/0.95. Sandy has her copy of the 70-200 and a 150-500 and just picked up the 90mm which she says I can use for a "price".

    I only use the 7r for infrared so having a bunch of lenses that I may or may not use is pointless.

    The 16-35 is a great wide lens just a little too wide for me and Sandy didn't like it as well so we ended up selling it. I did get some great files from it when I used it. The 70-200 was sold because Sandy has one and I simply didn't use it enough to justify a second copy.

    Okay, slightly off topic. The great (at least for me) reason to have the camera converted to wide spectrum aka full spectrum is the flexibility in using an assortment of filters. I had a conversation shortly with Life Pixel shortly after testing/reviewing the Leaf WS 50 on whether or nor there's a difference between "Wide Spectrum" which Leaf calls their color spectrum and "Full Spectrum" which Life Pixel calls their conversion and we decided there wasn't any. The files I captured looked the same from both systems. We decided it was just a naming convention.

    I've been carrying several filters with me ranging from a color to infrared including 580, 720 and 830 that I use depending on the location. Full/wide spectrum files are unique in themselves from normal color files and can be a real joy to see what they produce. I'm still surprised at the files where as I've used the IR filters enough to know what to expect.

    Shooting either wide spectrum or infrared is both easy and somewhat time consuming (speaking solely from a converted camera). There's the white balance that needs to be considered as well as post processing. I've made the WB easier by taking capturing a file using a Expo Disk as a first shot in the filter cycle then keeping the WB on the camera set to "Auto" bang away. The downside to using this method is that what you see in camera ill always have a red tint to it. I use the Expo Disk again if I cage filters thus giving me a place marker. The files are all opened in C1 Pro where the first file (Expo Disk) is calibrated for WB then copied over to all the remaining files in the series. Takes much longer to write about it than it does to actually do it. After much trial and error this process works for me.

    I've been doing landscape, nature and some wildlife as well as flash and lightning using the system described above with very good results.

    Hope this helps.

    Don
    Don Libby
    Iron Creek Photography
    Blog
    Tucson AZ

  20. #420
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Too hot here for anything other than a backyard shot.



    I just posted an article on my blog summarizing my experiences with infrared photography using the Sony α7R. Feedback and comments are always welcome.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #421
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    Too hot here for anything other than a backyard shot.



    I just posted an article on my blog summarizing my experiences with infrared photography using the Sony α7R. Feedback and comments are always welcome.

    Joe
    Nice shot and I'm not a fan of this NC heat/humidity right now. I'll probably force myself to shoot the Batis' this weekend though if at all possible.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  22. #422
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Sony A6000 FS, 590nm, Sigma 10-20 f/3.5

    Legare Street, Charleston, SC
    [img]Lagare Street-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr[/img]
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  23. #423
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    5 Shot (by hand as I didn't take my tripod) Vertically stitched Panorama taken from the Seattle Space Needle (A7R-FS + 55/1.8 Sonnar FE @ f/8 + Kolari Vision IR590... Metadata in the link)

    Space Needle Pano by Tre Nelson, on Flickr
    Last edited by iiiNelson; 26th July 2015 at 07:09.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  24. #424
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    This is a 25 Batis IR850 Test shot @ f/4... Not horrible but not great. It's a little hot in the middle but nowhere near as bad as the 85 Batis that blooms throughout most of the central part of the image.

    25BatisIR850Test by Tre Nelson, on Flickr
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  25. #425
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    This is a 25 Batis IR850 Test shot @ f/4... Not horrible but not great. It's a little hot in the middle but nowhere near as bad as the 85 Batis that blooms throughout most of the central part of the image.

    25BatisIR850Test by Tre Nelson, on Flickr
    I've dealt with hot spots much worse than this. How is it at f/8? Thanks for sharing this info, Tre.

  26. #426
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy Flood View Post
    I've dealt with hot spots much worse than this. How is it at f/8? Thanks for sharing this info, Tre.
    I'll try to do more testing... This is corrected by way of fiddling with the highlight slider. It's not horrible with the 850nm filter. It's worse with the 590nm filter straight out the camera but that too will require more testing. I've been swamped with work and wedding stuff but hopefully I will be getting some more time to shoot in the next few weeks.

    I'm waiting on the Adobe ACR/Lightroom Batis Profiles as my belief is that Adobe took their rendering engine up another level even above LR5 with LR6/CC. When combined with Photoshop and DXO I think I can get a better overall image than I can in Capture One Pro 8 that seems to add a tiny bit of softness to my multispectral images... which is great for portraits but not environmental shots. Capture One still has the edge for tethered shooting I believe though.
    Last edited by iiiNelson; 26th July 2015 at 08:41.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #427
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    ...I've been swamped with work and wedding stuff but hopefully I will be getting some more time to shoot in the next few weeks.
    That's funny. "More time to shoot" AFTER getting married.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  28. #428
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    That's funny. "More time to shoot" AFTER getting married.

    Joe
    We both understand the importance of time for ourselves to support our addictions - whether it's her time in reading at Barnes & Nobles or my time to try to find artistic beauty in daily living. It's healthier that way we feel.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  29. #429
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    My limited experience is the deeper IR you go, the worse any hot-spotting gets. One reason I like the lower false color band, and speaking for myself, prefer the more balanced look from them when converted to mono. Obviously for the high-contrast deep-IR look, you want to learn to deal with the hots. I found that a broadly feathered circular mask in CS can do wonders -- when you have it figured, save the mask for future use as a pre-set for that lens, then play with contrast and brightness sliders to balance.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  30. #430
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas/California/North Carolina
    Posts
    2,774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    My limited experience is the deeper IR you go, the worse any hot-spotting gets. One reason I like the lower false color band, and speaking for myself, prefer the more balanced look from them when converted to mono. Obviously for the high-contrast deep-IR look, you want to learn to deal with the hots. I found that a broadly feathered circular mask in CS can do wonders -- when you have it figured, save the mask for future use as a pre-set for that lens, then play with contrast and brightness sliders to balance.
    Yeah I haven't figured out the scientific cause but with my copy of the 25 Batis the IR Hotspot is noticeably worse when compared to a purer IR filter. It's possible that it's the lens coatings Zeiss uses because some of the Touits have IR issues as well. The 85 Batis is horrible though.

    I generally prefer doing IR shots in IR590 for the amount of flexibility available to me using that wavelength over longer wavelengths. As a bonus I can get the same look essentially as any other filter and it only takes a 18% gray card to white balance instead of looking for live foliage.
    Priolite Ambassador | Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  31. #431
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Fog on the Oregon Coast, Sunset Shores, Coos Bay

    Sony A6000, 590nm
    Fog on the Oregon Coast-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr
    Last edited by Cindy Flood; 2nd August 2015 at 11:10.
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  32. #432
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Shashin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    4,082
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    132

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Will

    http://www.hakusancreation.com
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  33. #433
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Cyprus Swamp
    [img]Cyprus Swamp-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr[/img]
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  34. #434
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    My first attempt. 680nm filter on full-spectrum A6000 (purchased from Cindy...who has been incredibly helpful answering my stupid beginner questions!).

    By the Lake - FE 16-35mm ƒ4 @ 23mm ƒ13
    Last edited by MikeEvangelist; 4th August 2015 at 10:59.
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  35. #435
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Another try...

    Catalpa tree
    Last edited by MikeEvangelist; 4th August 2015 at 11:00.
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  36. #436
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Surreal Playground

    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  37. #437
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Great photos, Mike!
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  38. #438
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    One of my favorite neighborhood trees, seen through my new (680nm) eyes.

    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  39. #439
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Beautiful! It is great to have you contributing to this thread.
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  40. #440
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Reflected trees.

    A6000, 680nm, FE 16-35mm @ 35mm @ 8
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  41. #441
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Mike, welcome to the fray! Whilst I eagerly await my full spectrum A7r to return, I could not resist playing with this image of yours -- hope you don't mind, and if you do I will delete it post-haste!

    Simple R<>B channel swap, pump R channel afterward in curves slightly to the point cyan in tree bark neutralizes a bit, then added a skosh of vibrance to balance overall look.

    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  42. #442
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I could not resist playing with this image of yours -- hope you don't mind, and if you do I will delete it post-haste!
    I like your take on it. I had tried the blue-red swap, but didn't like it as much. But yours is an improvement.

  43. #443
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    By playing with the individual curve color channels after the channel swap, you can significantly adjust the color of the leaves. Same with hue/sat tool on individual channels -- FWIW
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  44. #444
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Bethany
    A6000 FS, Sony 16-35 f/4 ZA OSS
    [img]Bethany-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr[/img]
    Last edited by Cindy Flood; 11th August 2015 at 05:48.
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  45. #445
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,197
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    I just got back from a week long+ whirlwind trip looping up through central Oregon to the Washington Palouse to Portland over to the coast and down to Carmel. I use a full spectrum A7r and 24-70 as my "p&s" and it works great. Filters are super quick and easy to change using the Xume filter system, using a Tamrac filter pouch on my belt, and room for a expodisc filter to set a wb shot before each filter change. Don Libby and I have dabbled a bit with IR flash capabilities, starting with the Quantum Qflash QF80. I've since made an IR adapter for the Profoto B1/B2, and this set-up worked exceptionally well on selected shots in Oregon. Blog post to follow (with all my free time ).

    This one off the beaten path:Name:  Lost congregation WEB.jpg
Views: 301
Size:  591.7 KB

    ken

  46. #446
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    A6000 FS, 590nm
    [img]Victorian Beauty-1 by Cindy Flood, on Flickr[/img]
    -Cindy
    www.cindyflood.com
    www.flickr.com/cindyflood
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  47. #447
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Playing with my newly arrived 590nm filter on the 16-35mm

    Pale Cucumbers

    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  48. #448
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Nice, Mike. I have found that the 16-35 works so well for infrared.

  49. #449
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,251
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1025

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    So here is my first capture with my "new" A7r Full Spectrum conversion... This was with the B+W 091 deep red which is supposed to be roughly 630nm. Set a custom WB, and it looked good in the VF, but colors seem overly vibrant -- thoughts? :

    Original as out of cam:


    R<>B Swap:


    But here is a B&W conversion from the captured file -- and I'm actually pretty impressed:
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  50. #450
    Senior Member MikeEvangelist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: "Capturing Infrared"

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    thoughts?
    I like it!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •