Knorp
Well-known member
Not sure about its bokeh qualities, but nevertheless it's gorgeous !
(with OKC6-75-1 2/75mm)
Kind regards.
The GetDPI Photography Forum
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Photographing your Bokeh
- Thread starter woodmancy
- Start date
Kind regards.
Tonygamble
Member
Another people shot.
43mm at f1.2 using asa 4000
43mm at f1.2 using asa 4000
Tonygamble
Member
Another, but this time in black and white. Same lens and probably the same f and iso.
Elliot
Active member
Which lens and camera?Another, but this time in black and white. Same lens and probably the same f and iso.
Tonygamble
Member
Olympus E-M5 Mk 2
Leica 42.5 f1.2
We printed the colour version of this shot on A0 paper for the foyer of the show. There is no evidence of any noise.
There are lots of shots at 4,000 in this sequence and a few at 12,500. The latter do struggle a bit but do did I focussing as some of the shots were in almost total darkness. These were with my Leica 25mm.
http://www.tonygamble.uk/My_Fair_Ball/index.html
But the real point is that this 42.5 and the Leica 25.0 do actually produce bokeh if you open them up fully.
Tony
Leica 42.5 f1.2
We printed the colour version of this shot on A0 paper for the foyer of the show. There is no evidence of any noise.
There are lots of shots at 4,000 in this sequence and a few at 12,500. The latter do struggle a bit but do did I focussing as some of the shots were in almost total darkness. These were with my Leica 25mm.
http://www.tonygamble.uk/My_Fair_Ball/index.html
But the real point is that this 42.5 and the Leica 25.0 do actually produce bokeh if you open them up fully.
Tony
Tonygamble
Member
The 25mm at f1.4
Happy Christmas everyone.
Tony
Happy Christmas everyone.
Tony
Tonygamble
Member
25mm?
Focal length of the lens.
Used a few posts earlier.
#5737
Tony
Focal length of the lens.
Used a few posts earlier.
#5737
Tony
Knorp
Well-known member
Hi there Tony,
Sorry, but I got a bit confused and was wondering if this 25mm was the Oly or the PL.
I'm still on the fence for a 25mm and in fact eyeing the old 4/3 PL 25/1.4 ...
Kind regards.
Tonygamble
Member
This is the Panasonic 25mm 1.4 Leica.
Same as I used for those BBQ chefs a couple of months ago. I tend to keep it at 1.4 as much of the time as possible so I get some decent separation.
There is a lot of stuff from the Panny 7-14 f4.0 on this thread. No bokeh but often a lovely feeling of depth. I opened a thread asking if anyone had tried the 2.8 along side it but not much interest around here at the moment.
http://www.tonygamble.uk/Family_Carols_2017/index.html
Tony
Same as I used for those BBQ chefs a couple of months ago. I tend to keep it at 1.4 as much of the time as possible so I get some decent separation.
There is a lot of stuff from the Panny 7-14 f4.0 on this thread. No bokeh but often a lovely feeling of depth. I opened a thread asking if anyone had tried the 2.8 along side it but not much interest around here at the moment.
http://www.tonygamble.uk/Family_Carols_2017/index.html
Tony
Knorp
Well-known member
I went for the old 4/3 Zuiko 7-14/4.0, apart from the 1 stop benefit, I'm not sure there is much difference in terms of 'bokeh' between 2.8 and 4.0
Tonygamble
Member
apart from the 1 stop benefit, I'm not sure there is much difference in terms of 'bokeh' between 2.8 and 4.0
Agreed as it so wide that almost everything is in focus - as you see from my shots.
And the 2.8 weighs twice as much. The 4.0 I can take in a jacket pocket whereas the other would force me into using a small bag which is annoying when one covers the sort of event you have just seen. I'd rather pick up the extra stop by using a higher ASA.
Agreed as it so wide that almost everything is in focus - as you see from my shots.
And the 2.8 weighs twice as much. The 4.0 I can take in a jacket pocket whereas the other would force me into using a small bag which is annoying when one covers the sort of event you have just seen. I'd rather pick up the extra stop by using a higher ASA.
