tom in mpls
Active member
Hey, I like brussel sprouts. But I'd like to see more examples from the GF1 and they need not be veggies.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Tom, here's a non-veggie photo with the GF1 (well, don't look too close). CheersHey, I like brussel sprouts. But I'd like to see more examples from the GF1 and they need not be veggies.
I do (composition) too, Brad. That is why I was asking about the shade area (and that you started a thread on "tricks &tips").Looks great to me -- and I really like the composition in this one Brad :thumbs:
Ron,
Nice work with the GF1 and great shot of the snake. It looked ready to nail you:shocked:
Regards,
Carl
Brad, I don't mean to rain on your parade but there's a heck of a lot of noise on these images for iso 500. Are these jpegs? I've seen iso 1600 samples of the GF1 that are not this noisy.Here's another try at processing in Photoshop...
and the color file...
I also use Topaz detail but not with as good results as yours. Can you share your settings.Here's one of my first with the GF1 and the 20mm. This is from RAW, through ACR and I sharpened it in Topaz Detail. The lens is lovely, with an amazingly narrow DOF at f1.7.
View attachment 23277
Cheers,
Well,Yes, this shot was pretty badly underexposed and the GF1 files don't take well to bumping up the exposure.
You've been spending too much time talking to Guy :ROTFL:I've seen but here is there info....
Well, I'm not banned yet . . . so presumably Guy hasn't seen it :ROTFL:Edit - doh.....just got the joke....hey at least I got it.
So, does that explain why the high ISO shots were not as good with the GF1?Sorry Jono not Guy...spent too much time at DPReview. It is pretty obvious in some spots in their review where the studio shots vs. the E-P1 (all metered) consistently have the same aperture and ISO but all of the Panny shots are at a faster shutter speed. When they got questioned about it they went back and added the chart.