"violent outburst"?
We're talking about photo equipment not war or something actually life and death meaningful. Don't get things too far out of perspective now.
And also you seem to be fabricating reality somewhat here. I don't think I was overly critical of your image at all. It was in someone else's thread. You posted a pigeon and I requested a 100% crop. You posted it and I replied:
The images that I was being critical about were these:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=37093234
And those are
seriously terrible! These were some of the very first samples to appear online from an owner/user of the Lumix 100-300 and these are as well as a few others very much like them from others posted a little later on, the reasons I thought the lens was so bad.
But allow me to clue you in a little bit. Anytime anyone posts an image online they should be prepared to receive criticism without taking it personally or seeking revenge in other forum venues - which would be very un-adult. If it's "just for fun" their own fun, then they should simply ignore any comments that don't seem "fun" to them. If they are like most people however they can probably benefit by listening to the analysis and critique offered - even if it feels hurtful or uncomfortable at first. If it does feel that way it's probably because you're taking it personally. When you post an image it automatically becomes a subjective thing and leaves the realm of your personage. People are free to hate it, love it, use it as a teaching tool, use it as a indication of the photographer's abilities or camera/lens qualities, and etc.
That's just how it is. It's not personal unless you make it so... and then it's only personal to
you.