Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 43 of 43

Thread: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

  1. #1
    Leslie Kelley
    Guest

    Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Just added a Lumix G1 to the family. Wat are we going to do with all that Canon glass? Wanted to take RAW files to maximize flexibility -- having spent a few bucks on a 16G card it seems silly to waste it.

    BUT we use PS Elements 5.0, and the RAW convertor only works with 6.0 and 7.0. Silkypix seems unwieldy, to say the least. (why would the Mac update have a Windows download option?)

    Do I have to upgrade to PSE 7.0? or is there a middle ground?

  2. #2
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    i use the silky pix to open the raw file and then save it in pse6 to work on it.

  3. #3
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Another alternative: Download Adobe DNG Converter 5.2. Use this to convert the G1 RAW files (.RW2) to DNG, which should now open in PSE 5.0. I have PSE 4.0.1 for Mac and this worked flawlessly for me. It saved me from upgrading to PSE 6, which is the latest Mac version (PSE 7 is Windows only, I think).

  4. #4
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by allan View Post
    Another alternative: Download Adobe DNG Converter 5.2. Use this to convert the G1 RAW files (.RW2) to DNG, which should now open in PSE 5.0. I have PSE 4.0.1 for Mac and this worked flawlessly for me. It saved me from upgrading to PSE 6, which is the latest Mac version (PSE 7 is Windows only, I think).
    The only caveat to that is the files are huge. Adobe/Panasonic are working on this but the DNG conversion is linear (no I don't understand it) but it blows up the file size.

  5. #5
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by TEBnewyork View Post
    The only caveat to that is the files are huge. Adobe/Panasonic are working on this but the DNG conversion is linear (no I don't understand it) but it blows up the file size.
    That's true. Once I'm satisfied with the final JPG/PSD/TIFF, however, I just delete the DNG (I keep the .RW2, of course). It's a temporary workaround if you're lazy like me and don't want the hassle of installing and learning a whole new program such as Silkypix.

    For me, PSE 4 is like a comfortable old pair of shoes and I won't upgrade/switch programs unless I absolutely have to.

  6. #6
    Senior Member barjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Galveston, TX
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    171

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I use Light Room 2.2 which works very well. I have PS3 but don't find I need it very often. Adobe really pi..ed me off with the upgrade price to PS4 as I have only had PS3 for about a year. I am waiting for DXOOptics to add the G1 to their program to see if I like it any better. Capture One does not support the G1 raw files and I don't like the workflow of Silkypix.
    V/r John

  7. #7
    Bhakti-rider
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I'm very interested in this, because I've ordered a G1, and I use Elements 5 also.

    Leslie:

    Could you expound on what you mean when you say "... we use PS Elements 5.0, and the RAW convertor only works with 6.0 and 7.0."

    After I got a 40D, I found that there was a version of an Adobe Camera Raw plug-in (for Photoshop and also for Elements) available to registered users of Elements to download, that could process 40D CR2 files. I tried it; it worked, but I didn't like it as much as DPP, so I never switched from DPP. My point is that you don't need version 7 or even 6 of Elements to employ the current version of Adobe Camera Raw; it worked for me in V5.

    I wonder if anyone has looked at the same G1 raw file with more than one converter... maybe I should have unambiguously gotten that from the previous posts, but I didn't...

    I bought Bibble a few months back based partly on the free upgrade to 5 when it's released, and I think I sure hope that it supports the G1's raw files. (And that it's released soon!)

  8. #8
    Senior Member peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tysons Corner, Virginia
    Posts
    490
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I have PSE 7.0 and the G1 Raw files can be processed really well.

    As for PSE 5.0 that I used to have.

    Depending on the platform you're using, here are the links for the DNG converter mentioned earlier for both PC and Macintosh.


    For Windows:

    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloa...14&fileID=3932

    For Macintosh:

    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloa...13&fileID=3933

    Mind you I haven't tried it. But my guess is it should work and therefore let PSE 5.0 process the Raw files.

    Peter
    Life is an infinite series of moments called..."now".
    My job is to capture them.

  9. #9
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    i have pse6 for mac and just dl the above dng and nothing happened. still can't open a raw file.
    i hate computers somedays.

  10. #10
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,538
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by back alley View Post
    i have pse6 for mac and just dl the above dng and nothing happened. still can't open a raw file.
    i hate computers somedays.
    Joe, You might want to try Raw Developer. You can download a free demo here:
    http://www.iridientdigital.com/produ...developer.html
    Works well for G1 RAW files and has some nice B&W conversion filters as well.

    Regards,
    Carl

  11. #11
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    i find it all so confusing. i'd prefer to be able to use pse from start to finish, just for the ease and my own comfort level with the program.

  12. #12
    Bhakti-rider
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    back alley:

    It seems as if you don't know that you can get a plug-in version of Adobe Camera Raw that will work as an available function while editing a file in Elements. Did I miss something - your last comment seems to me to indicate that you don't know about the ACR plug-in; if you indeed don't, you should know that there is one, it works within Elements, and you can download it.

  13. #13
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I am a huge fan of using as few pieces of software as possible for processing images, or at least using a series of softwares that integrate seamlessly together.

    In my case I use either C1 or CS4/ACR for raw conversion, then CS4 for local edits and output. Integrated inside CS4 are three NIK plug-ins that load as filters so are available inside CS4 as needed. And since those are my main softwares, I keep them all up to date with current versions. (And the most recent ACR plug-in supports the G1.)

    Since I use CS4 I do not use Elements, thus it is only "under the radar" for me insofar as it would be redundant. That said, assuming PSE has the basic functionality you need, then I would consider keeping it updated to current version. In this way you will stay on top of the learning curve with it and can continue using it with newly acquired cameras...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  14. #14
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bhakti-rider View Post
    back alley:

    It seems as if you don't know that you can get a plug-in version of Adobe Camera Raw that will work as an available function while editing a file in Elements. Did I miss something - your last comment seems to me to indicate that you don't know about the ACR plug-in; if you indeed don't, you should know that there is one, it works within Elements, and you can download it.
    i have the camera raw plug in but not the latest version. every time i try to load it the installer tells me it cannot find the product to upgrade.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Take notice that PS3 does open the G1 RW2 files after converting in Adobe RAW Converter as 8 bit 240 ppi..

    There's a preference on the bottom of your screen when you open the DNG in PS3. Here you can set it to 16 bit 300 ppi.

  16. #16
    Bhakti-rider
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    back alley:

    Oh, that's a frustrating scenario. Have you tried to inquire of Adobe customer support, or would that be a futile effort?

  17. #17
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bhakti-rider View Post
    back alley:

    Oh, that's a frustrating scenario. Have you tried to inquire of Adobe customer support, or would that be a futile effort?
    till now i have not needed that update.
    i guess i could look around to see what exactly the problem is and what the fix is.

    joe

  18. #18
    olyinaz
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I bought a cheap copy of PSE7 on eBay exactly for processing raw images from my G1. I just can't get into Silkypix and once I've got the raw developed in PSE7 if I want to work on it I save it to .tif and open it in CS3. I'm not at all pleased that Adobe has already kicked CS3 to the curb given they were selling it only months ago but the $40 I paid for Elements didn't break the bank and it works. My only beef? The ACR development module in Elements isn't as full featured as the one that opens the files into Photoshop.

    Regards,
    Oly

  19. #19
    Senior Member peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tysons Corner, Virginia
    Posts
    490
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Hi Oly,

    It's true PSE 7.0 is not as full featured but the quality of the RAW files out of the camera are so good that, for the most part, very little tweaking is required.

    What I've found (and everyone has their own preference here) is that straight from the camera I open up the RAW files in the edit menu. I typically shoot at ISO 200 so I'm not too concerned about noise which is EXTREMELY low on the G1 from ISO 100 to 400. (Faster lenses either from Panasonic or already existing that you can attach via adapters will allow better performance in this low ISO range.)

    First thing I do is stay in 16 bit mode for as long as I can. And unless I'm covering up a mole or something I rarely leave it.

    Unless a subject is in shadow in a severely backlit scene (that the camera REALLY exposed for) I leave color temperature alone. Once or twice I had to change my subjects temperature which came in in the low 4280K area or so and bumped it up to obtain a more pleasing warm light.

    Next I usually raise the black level to around +16. This seems to work for most general shots. If the scene is particularly bright I may push it to +22 or +32 but I haven't had occasion yet to go higher.

    Brightness for general exposed shots is kept at the default +50. If the scene is bright and camera metering tried to make an 18% gray out of it, I find I have to push this up to +90 - +100. But not much higher as things start to blow out at that point unless there's a desired effect.

    Everything else is left at default. With the ISO anywhere from 100 to 400, I found little need to adjust luminance and color. If I want to go B&W, I can dial down the Saturation or, open the image and convert to B&W and use one of the settings there.

    While I can sharpen the image in RAW I find I prefer to use the unsharp mask which is very effective with G1 images, although, for the most part, I've found the kit lens produces extremely sharp image and from what I can tell additional optics made possible via the adapters are even sharper. When I do find it necessary to sharpen things just a tad, generally I go 80% for general shots and 45% for women. (Not to be sexist but since I've been playing with this camera I've found that women do not like detail revealed by the sharpening with a lens that, to be honest, doesn't need much enhancement to begin with.)

    True the full CS has a lot of additional controls but so far with the G1 I find I simply do not need it. (Although now I'm sure having said that I will probably have occasion to need those extra controls!)

    Peter
    Life is an infinite series of moments called..."now".
    My job is to capture them.

  20. #20
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by back alley View Post
    i have the camera raw plug in but not the latest version. every time i try to load it the installer tells me it cannot find the product to upgrade.
    Have you tried manually installing the plug-in? Here are the instructions from Adobe's webpage:

    To install with Adobe Photoshop Elements 6: NOTE: You must follow all of the new instructions in order to successfully install the Camera Raw plug-in for Photoshop Elements.

    1. Exit Photoshop Elements and Adobe Bridge.
    2. Open the download file and double-click CameraProfiles.dmg and follow the onscreen instructions.
    3. Navigate to the root of the local disk (not the user's home folder).
    4. Navigate to: (Please read directory carefully)

    Library/Application Support/Adobe/Plug-Ins/CS3/File Formats

    5. Move the existing plug-in to another location (for example, a new folder on your desktop). Ensure you keep this version in case you need to revert back.
    6. Copy the Camera Raw plug-in, Camera Raw, from the download into the same folder as in Step 4.
    7. Launch Photoshop Elements or Adobe Bridge.

    Page: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloa...jsp?ftpID=4219

  21. #21
    Senior Member barjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Galveston, TX
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    171

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Allan, I tried putting ACR 5.2 in the CS3 folder as described in your post; however, when you try and open an RW2 file it says it is an incompatible version of the plug in.
    V/r John

  22. #22
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by barjohn View Post
    Allan, I tried putting ACR 5.2 in the CS3 folder as described in your post; however, when you try and open an RW2 file it says it is an incompatible version of the plug in.
    From the page that I linked to:

    "The Camera Raw 5.2 plug-in is not compatible with versions of Photoshop earlier than Photoshop CS4 or versions of Photoshop Elements earlier than Photoshop Elements 6."

    If you want to open the RW2 files in Photoshop directly without first having to go through the DNG conversion, you'll need to upgrade to Photoshop CS4.

    I really don't like how Adobe abandons support for the latest version of the ACR plug-in for older versions of Photoshop, but at least with the latest version of their DNG converter, you can still access the G1 RAW files with these earlier versions of PS/PSE. The resultant DNG files will be huge, but hopefully Adobe/Panasonic will rectify this soon.

    In back alley's case, he mentions that he has PSE 6 for Mac, so the instructions for manually installing the ACR 5.2 plug-in should work--he won't need to convert to DNG at all.

    I have Photoshop Elements 4.0.1 and am going the DNG conversion route for now because I refuse to install and learn another program such as Silkypix. (I've heard that its interface is very clunky.)

    I see you have Lightroom 2.2 as well. I'm not familiar with the program. Is it meant as replacement for Photoshop, or as a supplement?

  23. #23
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    i get that same message about it being incompatible.

    it might be me though as i am not well versed in software/hardware issues. frankly, i am amazed i have never blown a computer up.

    joe

  24. #24
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    It depends on what you do in Photoshop. I use Lightroom and rarely go to photoshop ( when working on something I will print large). Photoshop has a larger audience than just photographers and Lightroom is designed specifically for photography. Why not download a 30 day trial version. There are plenty of free resources on the web for tutorials or just ask questions here. If you have any students in your household the academic discount is good and it comes out to only $95.



    Quote Originally Posted by allan View Post
    From the page that I linked to:

    "The Camera Raw 5.2 plug-in is not compatible with versions of Photoshop earlier than Photoshop CS4 or versions of Photoshop Elements earlier than Photoshop Elements 6."

    If you want to open the RW2 files in Photoshop directly without first having to go through the DNG conversion, you'll need to upgrade to Photoshop CS4.

    I really don't like how Adobe abandons support for the latest version of the ACR plug-in for older versions of Photoshop, but at least with the latest version of their DNG converter, you can still access the G1 RAW files with these earlier versions of PS/PSE. The resultant DNG files will be huge, but hopefully Adobe/Panasonic will rectify this soon.

    In back alley's case, he mentions that he has PSE 6 for Mac, so the instructions for manually installing the ACR 5.2 plug-in should work--he won't need to convert to DNG at all.

    I have Photoshop Elements 4.0.1 and am going the DNG conversion route for now because I refuse to install and learn another program such as Silkypix. (I've heard that its interface is very clunky.)

    I see you have Lightroom 2.2 as well. I'm not familiar with the program. Is it meant as replacement for Photoshop, or as a supplement?

  25. #25
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    pse is meant for mostly photographers, is it not?

  26. #26
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by back alley View Post
    pse is meant for mostly photographers, is it not?
    Yes it is. Funny though I find Lightroom easier to understand. But a lot of people use Lightroom/PS combo. Lightroom has added additional features to make the need to go to Photoshop less and less.

  27. #27
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    i do very simple manipulations with pse6 so i can't say that is very complex for me. i had ps7 before, on my old pc and never used 99% of what it offered.

    i need to get one of my computer savvy buddies over here to help me get he new camera raw upgrade working.

    joe

  28. #28
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    ok, i loaded lightroom 2.2 as a trail demo and it works fine, i can open my raw files.

    but looking at learning a whole new way to process my image files is sorta depressing.

    i discovered that these are all adobe. why has adobe so many software packages to do the same thing? i thought photoshop was the be all and end all of image processing and that elements was a smaller and edited version of ps. where does lightroom fit in the scheme of things?

    joe

  29. #29
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    You are right on that PSE is a slimmer version of Photoshop. Lightroom was developed help with a whole workflow for photographers. It is great for being able to catalogue and manage your images and then move into the develop module. I don't want to push a new workflow on you. I found it really easy to learn as everything is laid out for you to use.

    Here are a couple of useful links. There are also some other good video/book based tutorials but not for free.

    http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/archives/videos/

    http://www.photoshopsupport.com/ligh...tutorials.html

  30. #30
    Senior Member barjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Galveston, TX
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    171

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    LR is also a file organizer and offers Pros the ability to batch process large numbers of images. Overall it offers a lot of flexibility but there are areas where it falls a little short for me. One area is the inability to control the view except in large increments, fill, 1:1, 2:1, etc. Other programs allow you to specify the percentage which I prefer. Also, the sharpening and noise reduction are not up to what is available from either PS3 or 4 or other applications. If I had to summarize it I would say it is good at many things but not great at anything.
    V/r John

  31. #31
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    well, i have the trail version so i intend to play with it, though i would prefer not to spend 300 bucks on software when there are so many other more interesting toys out there.

    i have a headache

    thanks for all the help folks, not sure what an old guy is supposed to do to keep up these days.

    joe

  32. #32
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by back alley View Post
    i get that same message about it being incompatible.

    it might be me though as i am not well versed in software/hardware issues. frankly, i am amazed i have never blown a computer up.

    joe
    Try resetting PSE6's preferences by doing this:

    Hold down the Shift, Option and Command keys while launching PSE6.

    Reset Adobe Bridge's preferences as well by holding down the exact same key combination while launching Bridge.

    You may also want to delete your Adobe Camera Raw preference file for good measure and try manually reinstalling the ACR 5.2 plug-in.

    Try all these and see if it works.

  33. #33
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    ok, i reset the preferences and now when i try to open a raw file it goes to dreamweaver and dreamweaver freezes and does not open.

    joe

  34. #34
    Senior Member Amin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Posts
    1,809
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by TEBnewyork View Post
    The only caveat to that is the files are huge. Adobe/Panasonic are working on this but the DNG conversion is linear (no I don't understand it) but it blows up the file size.
    This means that it isn't RAW anymore. A linear DNG has been demosaiced, and the RAW data are no longer available to be processed should better demosaicing algorithms come along in the future. This is in contrast to "Raw DNG", which contains the raw image data plus metadata. A linear DNG is more closely related to something like TIFF than it is to a RAW file type.

    The whole idea of "linear DNG" probably comes from Adobe's desire to have a file type that could be used for all purposes. Ie, raw DNG for RAW files, and linear DNG for everything else. All kinds of files, JPG, TIF, PNG, PSD, etc can be converted to linear DNG. Obviously such a conversion cannot restore the raw sensor data (in many cases, eg analog cameras, there was no sensor data to begin with), highlighting the fact that a linear DNG is not a RAW file type.

    The issue here is that, for the G1, LX3, and FZ28, Adobe has agreed to Panasonic's request that Adobe software implement automatic correction for lens flaws including barrel distortion. These corrections are applied when processing in Adobe Camera Raw/Lightroom, and also when converting to linear DNG, the only option for these cameras in Adobe DNG Converter.

    Say, for example, you process a G1 RAW file in Raw Developer (Iridient Digital), you will see all the barrel distortion unmodified, along with a wider angle of view. In addition, the detail will be rendered according to the Raw Developer demosaic process. If instead you were to take the same G1 RAW file, convert it to DNG, and then open that DNG in Raw Developer, the barrel distortion correction would be "baked in" irreversibly, and the detail rendering will have been determined by the Adobe demosaic process. If you want that wider angle of view back and don't mind the barrel distortion, that option will have been lost, as the DNG file, in this case, is no longer RAW.
    Last edited by Amin; 4th January 2009 at 19:47.

  35. #35
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by back alley View Post
    ok, i reset the preferences and now when i try to open a raw file it goes to dreamweaver and dreamweaver freezes and does not open.

    joe
    Joe, try Control clicking on a .RW2 file. A menu should come up, with an option that says "Open With". Choose Photoshop Elements 6.0 from the list that pops up. Let us know what happens.

    If that does not work, try converting the .RW2 file first to DNG and then control clicking as above but with the .dng file instead.

  36. #36
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Have a look at this thread....

    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=30170877

    Eric Chan is from Adobe

  37. #37
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Amin View Post
    This means that it isn't RAW anymore. A linear DNG has been demosaiced, and the RAW data are no longer available to be processed should better demosaicing algorithms come along in the future. This is in contrast to "Raw DNG", which contains the raw image data plus metadata. A linear DNG is more closely related to something like TIFF than it is to a RAW file type.

    The whole idea of "linear DNG" probably comes from Adobe's desire to have a file type that could be used for all purposes. Ie, raw DNG for RAW files, and linear DNG for everything else. All kinds of files, JPG, TIF, PNG, PSD, etc can be converted to linear DNG. Obviously such a conversion cannot restore the raw sensor data (in many cases, eg analog cameras, there was no sensor data to begin with), highlighting the fact that a linear DNG is not a RAW file type.

    The issue here is that, for the G1, LX3, and FZ28, Adobe has agreed to Panasonic's request that Adobe software implement automatic correction for lens flaws including barrel distortion. These corrections are applied when processing in Adobe Camera Raw/Lightroom, and also when converting to linear DNG, the only option for these cameras in Adobe DNG Converter.

    Say, for example, you process a G1 RAW file in Raw Developer (Iridient Digital), you will see all the barrel distortion unmodified, along with a wider angle of view. In addition, the detail will be rendered according to the Raw Developer demosaic process. If instead you were to take the same G1 RAW file, convert it to DNG, and then open that DNG in Raw Developer, the barrel distortion correction would be "baked in" irreversibly, and the detail rendering will have been determined by the Adobe demosaic process. If you want that wider angle of view back and don't mind the barrel distortion, that option will have been lost, as the DNG file, in this case, is no longer RAW.
    Thanks for the explanation. I guess it's always wise to hang on to the original RAW (.RW2) files--that's what I do anyway.

    Having said that, I am pretty pleased with the G1's JPGs straight out of the camera so far. Much better than some of my previous cameras. I still always shoot RAW+JPG just in case, however.

  38. #38
    Senior Member back alley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    the frozen north
    Posts
    428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by allan View Post
    Joe, try Control clicking on a .RW2 file. A menu should come up, with an option that says "Open With". Choose Photoshop Elements 6.0 from the list that pops up. Let us know what happens.

    If that does not work, try converting the .RW2 file first to DNG and then control clicking as above but with the .dng file instead.
    using 'open with', the only option is dreamweaver.
    i will play with it some more tonight after work.
    joe

  39. #39
    Senior Member Amin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Posts
    1,809
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    I want to correct something I said above. I was wrong in stating that "A linear DNG is more closely related to something like TIFF than it is to a RAW file type".

    Eric Chan of Adobe made he following comment on the Serious Compacts blog this morning:

    Although a linear DNG is not equivalent to the original raw data, it still permits the majority of the operations that a raw converter does, such as colorimetric interpretation (using a color profile), white balance, and highlight recovery (among others). These abilities make linear DNG files fundamentally different from fully rendered files. The main ability that is lost with the use of linear DNG is the ability to use different demosaic algorithms down the road (and of course, as you've noted, the file size of a linear DNG is much bigger because the single channel data has already been expanded to 3 or 4 color channel data).
    So the lens corrections have been baked in (no going back), and one has lost the option to demosaic using a different process in the future, but the file maintains more of its original potential than I suggested.

  40. #40
    patrick-ss
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Leslie,
    Rawtherapee a free downloadable raw converter works fine on the G1...
    It's just been updated.
    I to dislike sillkypix, rawtherapee as a much better interface and it's
    free...
    All the best
    Patrick

  41. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    128
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by patrick-ss View Post
    Leslie,
    Rawtherapee a free downloadable raw converter works fine on the G1...
    It's just been updated.
    I to dislike sillkypix, rawtherapee as a much better interface and it's
    free...
    All the best
    Patrick
    Hi, do you know if this app works in Vista 64 bit, just looked at the docs on the Rawtherapee website and it says XP, no mention of Vista.


    Mark.

  42. #42
    patrick-ss
    Guest

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by mark1000 View Post
    Hi, do you know if this app works in Vista 64 bit, just looked at the docs on the Rawtherapee website and it says XP, no mention of Vista.


    Mark.
    Hi Mark1000,
    Sorry late reply I run it on vista 32.. not sure about 64 though..!!
    but it works fine in normal vista had no problems at all.
    sorry can't be more helpfull
    All the best
    Patrick

  43. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    128
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Photoshop Elements beneath the radar here?

    Quote Originally Posted by patrick-ss View Post
    Hi Mark1000,
    Sorry late reply I run it on vista 32.. not sure about 64 though..!!
    but it works fine in normal vista had no problems at all.
    sorry can't be more helpfull
    All the best
    Patrick
    Thanks for the reply,

    Mark.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •