Olympus EM1.2

[ptomsu]

Bokeh.

You really think so ??????????

2017-05-26_0119.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

 

[ptomsu]

Some more bokeh samples of the 2.8/40-150 PRO

my daughter this evening

2017-05-28_0014.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

2017-05-28_0028.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

2017-05-28_0048.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

 

[ptomsu]

Bokeh.

How much more bokeh do you actually need??????

2017-05-28_0111.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

2017-05-28_0160.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr

 

[Knorp]

How much more bokeh do you actually need??????

it's quality over quantity: the 40-150/2.8 can be a tad nervous at times imo.
Your second image is lovely though and oozes quality ...

 

[ptomsu]

it's quality over quantity: the 40-150/2.8 can be a tad nervous at times imo.
Your second image is lovely though and oozes quality ...

Thanks Bart!

For me the bokeh of the 40-150/2.8 is almost perfect in 98% of the situations. What is much more important that its versatility and sharpness and responsiveness with the EM1.2 already make it a perfect choice for me. And comparing bokeh - the Fuji 100-400 is not better at all.

 

[scott kirkpatrick]

Re: Olympus EM1.2 -- it's nice to be able to span 12-100 mm

It's actually possible to climb up inside to the top of this light tower and aim all the lights, but you'd have to be pretty small...

P6110705 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

P6110714 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

P6110716 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

P6110702 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

scott