Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: Em5iii

  1. #1
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Em5iii

    Someone has to start this ....

    https://www.43rumors.com/ft5-first-l...ympus-e-m5iii/

    The camera will have most of the E-M1X features for a fraction of the price - this sentence caught my eyes .... we will see.


    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  2. #2
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Ok, so the EM5III is meanwhile out and still nobody who is interested?

    https://www.dpreview.com/news/820250...a-mini-e-m1-ii

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/oly...initial-review

    It is actually a small (form factor) EM1.2 and by that maybe the smallest mirrorless camera that is hugely capable.

    I must say I am most likely not going to buy one as I have the EM1.2 but I could see this being a very appealing offer for many others who upgrade or want to have a second smaller camera besides their EM1 type of camera.

    Any thoughts or reactions?

  3. #3
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    4,576
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Ok, so the EM5III is meanwhile out and still nobody who is interested?

    https://www.dpreview.com/news/820250...a-mini-e-m1-ii

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/oly...initial-review

    It is actually a small (form factor) EM1.2 and by that maybe the smallest mirrorless camera that is hugely capable.

    I must say I am most likely not going to buy one as I have the EM1.2 but I could see this being a very appealing offer for many others who upgrade or want to have a second smaller camera besides their EM1 type of camera.

    Any thoughts or reactions?
    Generally... I’m not not interested in much of what Olympus makes. Looks like a decent offering that’s not for me. They’re really tying themselves to the choice for outdoor people that want compact size. Good for them but I am just not all that interested in their products.
    Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    10,798
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2518

    Re: Em5iii

    Beautiful camera, great features, hate the user interface

    Still it's a dilemma for me. My GX8 bodies won't last forever. The logical upgrade would be the G95, but this is much smaller and handier. One of each? Zuiko 12-100 on the Olympus and PL 50-200 on the Panasonic?

  5. #5
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    So I have someone in mind who builds furniture and is interested in taking pictures of a furniture piece by itself and in a room setting, capturing the entire room. I would be willing to let them use my E-M5.2 and some lenses.

    Here is my question:

    In which way is the E-M5.3 improved over the E-M5.2 feature wise?
    I know about the sensor difference, so don't need that explained, as I also have an E-M1.2.

    But how about focus stacking, high resolution images etc.
    Especially what features would be beneficial for shooting furniture and interior designs?

    TIA.
    With best regards, K-H.

  6. #6
    Senior Member AlanS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Well I tried a Em5ii and nice camera but like Jurgen just could not get on with it. I have a Pen f now, fancied one for ages but not sure I am going to keep it! Same issue as the Em5, the damn interface! It is a shame as I quite like it otherwise.

  7. #7
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    10,798
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2518

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by k-hawinkler View Post
    So I have someone in mind who builds furniture and is interested in taking pictures of a furniture piece by itself and in a room setting, capturing the entire room. I would be willing to let them use my E-M5.2 and some lenses.

    Here is my question:

    In which way is the E-M5.3 improved over the E-M5.2 feature wise?
    I know about the sensor difference, so don't need that explained, as I also have an E-M1.2.

    But how about focus stacking, high resolution images etc.
    Especially what features would be beneficial for shooting furniture and interior designs?

    TIA.
    - Better AF (phase detect)
    - Much better video
    - Probably much better hi-res mode
    - Smaller/lighter
    - Better weather sealing
    - Better IBIS
    https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-ch...r-i/index.html
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorgen Udvang View Post
    - Better AF (phase detect)
    - Much better video
    - Probably much better hi-res mode
    - Smaller/lighter
    - Better weather sealing
    - Better IBIS
    This is what I have extracted from the available information:
    - IBIS 5.5 stops (6.5 stops with Sync IS) vs 5 stops.
    - In cameras USB-C charging
    - 121-point hybrid autofocus system vs CDAF only
    - 2.36M-dot OLED viewfinder with 60 fps refresh rate vs LCD viewfinder
    - 20Mp vs 16Mp resolution.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #9
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by SrMphoto View Post
    This is what I have extracted from the available information:
    - IBIS 5.5 stops (6.5 stops with Sync IS) vs 5 stops.
    - In cameras USB-C charging
    - 121-point hybrid autofocus system vs CDAF only
    - 2.36M-dot OLED viewfinder with 60 fps refresh rate vs LCD viewfinder
    - 20Mp vs 16Mp resolution.
    Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
    What about high resolution images?
    Is that still under wraps?
    TIA.
    With best regards, K-H.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by k-hawinkler View Post
    Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
    What about high resolution images?
    Is that still under wraps?
    TIA.
    50Mp vs 40Mp high-res mode.

    The EVF has now a longer eyepoint (better for glasses wearers), but smaller magnification. Bluetooth has been added.

    Corrections:
    - in-camera micro USB charging (not USB-C)
    - equally compared, 0.5 stops IBIS improvement.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  11. #11
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by SrMphoto View Post
    This is what I have extracted from the available information:
    - IBIS 5.5 stops (6.5 stops with Sync IS) vs 5 stops.
    - In cameras USB-C charging
    - 121-point hybrid autofocus system vs CDAF only
    - 2.36M-dot OLED viewfinder with 60 fps refresh rate vs LCD viewfinder
    - 20Mp vs 16Mp resolution.
    USB-C Charging is true - BUT it is only Micro USB-C

    The longer I think about this and Olympus in general the more uninterested I am getting in their products. There are so much more possibilities out there that are much better and even pretty small size.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    USB-C Charging is true - BUT it is only Micro USB-C

    The longer I think about this and Olympus in general the more uninterested I am getting in their products. There are so much more possibilities out there that are much better and even pretty small size.
    M III has only USB Micro B connector. I have not heard of USB Micro-C.
    I think M III is a nice upgrade from M II.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  13. #13
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    10,798
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2518

    Re: Em5iii

    Since I usually carry devices with USB-C and Micro USB when I travel, I've bought an (expensive) excellent USB charger with two outlets in addition to two very high quality cables, one of each. To be on the safe side, charger and cables are bright red or red/black, so that I see them when I leave hotel rooms.

  14. #14
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by SrMphoto View Post
    M III has only USB Micro B connector. I have not heard of USB Micro-C.
    I think M III is a nice upgrade from M II.
    I agree. Though I won’t upgrade as I have other tools.
    Nevertheless the E-M5.2 is still a very nice camera to get somebody started.
    With best regards, K-H.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    10,798
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2518

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by k-hawinkler View Post
    I agree. Though I won’t upgrade as I have other tools.
    Nevertheless the E-M5.2 is still a very nice camera to get somebody started.
    Mobile phones are often accused of destroying the camera industry, but that's only half the truth. Photographers are starting to realise that buying every single model that is launched makes no sense, and it certainly doesn't make anyone a better photographer. We are moving towards a situation where most people buy a new camera because they need it, not because it's new, and production volumes will reflect that. Hopefully, the camera industry will adapt.
    https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-ch...r-i/index.html
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by SrMphoto View Post
    M III has only USB Micro B connector. I have not heard of USB Micro-C.
    I think M III is a nice upgrade from M II.
    Well, that's even worse. I had hoped for a simple USBC connector same as on my Macbook Pro. In these times I think that is a serious flaw!

    As I said not a camera for me.

  17. #17
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    4,576
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    I think this is a natural progression for this series of cameras. It's a solid offering but I'm also of the opinion that more manufacturers should offer a wider variety of body styles. I'm of the opinoin that there are times when "smaller is better" and there are times when that isn't the case. In many ways I do believe that the marketing of cameras have pigeonholed their design in many way for MOST camera makers. I do believe that such an emphasis was placed on the fact that mirrorless design would allow the possibility of smaller cameras that many have come to expect this and shun any variance. That's a large part of the problem with what Panasonic is dealing with. Many love them but the reviews don't paint the designs in a completely favorable light which I view as an issue objectively. The cameras may not be the first choice for an everyday camera for all people but there is definitely room for a "pro design" camera just the same way there's room for a more compact camera for everyday travel or vacation. I think Fuji and the L-Mount Alliance are "getting this" better than everyone else with the release of the Sigma fp, the Leica L-mount bodies, and Panasonic Lumix S bodies... I sincerely hope Sony gets with the program as well (even if that means releasing a body above the A9) but as it stands there are options like the Tamron FE mount lenses that offer great performance at a reasonable size for the existing bodies. Quite simply it's why I never bought the GM zoom lenses (as outstanding as they are) and considered other brands more seriously the last few years. I love the existing bodies with the FE primes but I sometimes rented the zooms for certain types of paid work.


    So in short I still think that this is a solid offering for existing Olympus users that want to remain with the products of the company but it's just not for me. I had a really bad experience when I briefly owned Olympus products and I'll likely never buy another one... they just aren't for me like Nikon products aren't... and I fully acknowledge that it's a "me" thing. I still push people to Panasonic for Micro 4/3 becauseI feel they're a healthier company with a more realistic upgrade path (IMO of course) plus a more expanded portfolio of "pro quality" options for photo and video.
    Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  18. #18
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    10,798
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2518

    Re: Em5iii

    Back in the film days, Olympus offered one and a half body styles only, the single digit OM-1/2/3/4 and the double digit 10/20/30/40. In reality, the only significant differences were the build quality/material and the viewfinders. That style lasted for 30 years.

    Currently, they're making four and a half styles, the E-M5 and 10 being close to identical in size and shape. That's kind of progress, but they seem to have failed in the enthusiast market for "rangefinder style" cameras. The Pen-F was probably too expensive and had to go, which is what happened to the Panasonic GX8 as well. That's unfortunate, since Sony seems to be doing well with the equaly expensive A6500/6600, not to speak about the Fuji X-Pro Series, although I suspect that Fuji keeps them in the game more as an intellectual statement than anything else. "We are a film company so we make a camera that looks as if it's using film."

    Being a Panasonic user, I agree that Panasonic has been better at offering cameras for clearly defined niches, currently with five distinctly different bodies, most of them with great ergonomics. Unfortunately, that hasn't resulted in great commercial success. Still, Panasonic seems to be in for the long term, and being the biggest company, they can probably afford to.

    A varied offering doesn't necessarily seem to be the recipe for success in this market. The two market leaders, Sony and Fuji, have totally different policies here, Sony with their two and a half bodies while Fuji has nine(!) if we include medium format (and unless I have forgotten any).

  19. #19
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    4,576
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorgen Udvang View Post
    Back in the film days, Olympus offered one and a half body styles only, the single digit OM-1/2/3/4 and the double digit 10/20/30/40. In reality, the only significant differences were the build quality/material and the viewfinders. That style lasted for 30 years.

    Currently, they're making four and a half styles, the E-M5 and 10 being close to identical in size and shape. That's kind of progress, but they seem to have failed in the enthusiast market for "rangefinder style" cameras. The Pen-F was probably too expensive and had to go, which is what happened to the Panasonic GX8 as well. That's unfortunate, since Sony seems to be doing well with the equaly expensive A6500/6600, not to speak about the Fuji X-Pro Series, although I suspect that Fuji keeps them in the game more as an intellectual statement than anything else. "We are a film company so we make a camera that looks as if it's using film."

    Being a Panasonic user, I agree that Panasonic has been better at offering cameras for clearly defined niches, currently with five distinctly different bodies, most of them with great ergonomics. Unfortunately, that hasn't resulted in great commercial success. Still, Panasonic seems to be in for the long term, and being the biggest company, they can probably afford to.

    A varied offering doesn't necessarily seem to be the recipe for success in this market. The two market leaders, Sony and Fuji, have totally different policies here, Sony with their two and a half bodies while Fuji has nine(!) if we include medium format (and unless I have forgotten any).
    I think the success with Sony’s minimal bodies styles has to be qualified. A big part of their success is that they keep the older models in circulation as the value models whereas many other companies release incrementally improved new versions every year. Sony is able to do this because frankly the tech remain competitive for a much longer period. For example the A7Rii is a 4+ years old camera that is technically competitive with the newer more expensive cameras from the biggest rivals... the same can be said for the A6000 which is probably closer to being 5-6 years old. You’re right in your post above that many are buying fewer cameras and upgrading less frequently and I’m an example of that. My newest camera is the A7RII and while I did purchase it a few months after initial release, the two upgrades didn’t really address all of my biggest shortcomings of the camera - namely the base size when used with larger lenses. I won’t say that the ergonomics are bad because I don’t believe they are but I do believe there’s room for a slightly larger body along the size the the Fuji XH1. Ironically this camera received a lot of negative press for the increased size which wasn’t deserved IMO and some negative press which was deserved in the amount of unreliable units at launch. I agree that Fuji offers the most body types and has a “value” version and premium version of each style for all budgets. Theres also the fact that Olympus’ name doesn’t carry the weight it once did but nearly everyone knows Canon, Nikon, and Sony by extension of all of the other products they make. Panasonic will always have a market because of their video expertise and the GH line provided them an elevated level of “street cred” in the hybrid camera space. Fuji started the X like as an “Leica alternative” at a time when the M8 or M9 seemed completely unobtainable for the average photographer with the added bonus of AF lenses.

    All of these companies cornered and attacked their own niche of the market which in many ways Olympus did not. I believe now they’re starting to accept the idea (within the last few years) that their niche can be the adventure photographer where size and weight will be of concern. They can provide IQ of a high enough nature and having the highest ISO values doesn’t matter because most are only going to use the cameras from dawn to dusk. I believe this is why their most important products are their tough series compact cameras and the OM-D line. In reality they can and should drop EVERYTHING else and focus on these lines exclusively. Keep the older bodies in production as value options and maybe cut the EM1x price to $2k while adjusting everything else to more rational pricing. As good as that camera may be, the pricing largely had it DOA commercially before it arrived to the stores. They can pretend that it competes directly with the A9’s, 1D’s, and Dx cameras of the world but I’m sure most pro sports photographers will disagree.
    Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  20. #20
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by iiiNelson View Post
    I think the success with Sony’s minimal bodies styles has to be qualified. A big part of their success is that they keep the older models in circulation as the value models whereas many other companies release incrementally improved new versions every year. Sony is able to do this because frankly the tech remain competitive for a much longer period. For example the A7Rii is a 4+ years old camera that is technically competitive with the newer more expensive cameras from the biggest rivals... the same can be said for the A6000 which is probably closer to being 5-6 years old. You’re right in your post above that many are buying fewer cameras and upgrading less frequently and I’m an example of that. My newest camera is the A7RII and while I did purchase it a few months after initial release, the two upgrades didn’t really address all of my biggest shortcomings of the camera - namely the base size when used with larger lenses. I won’t say that the ergonomics are bad because I don’t believe they are but I do believe there’s room for a slightly larger body along the size the the Fuji XH1. Ironically this camera received a lot of negative press for the increased size which wasn’t deserved IMO and some negative press which was deserved in the amount of unreliable units at launch. I agree that Fuji offers the most body types and has a “value” version and premium version of each style for all budgets. Theres also the fact that Olympus’ name doesn’t carry the weight it once did but nearly everyone knows Canon, Nikon, and Sony by extension of all of the other products they make. Panasonic will always have a market because of their video expertise and the GH line provided them an elevated level of “street cred” in the hybrid camera space. Fuji started the X like as an “Leica alternative” at a time when the M8 or M9 seemed completely unobtainable for the average photographer with the added bonus of AF lenses.

    All of these companies cornered and attacked their own niche of the market which in many ways Olympus did not. I believe now they’re starting to accept the idea (within the last few years) that their niche can be the adventure photographer where size and weight will be of concern. They can provide IQ of a high enough nature and having the highest ISO values doesn’t matter because most are only going to use the cameras from dawn to dusk. I believe this is why their most important products are their tough series compact cameras and the OM-D line. In reality they can and should drop EVERYTHING else and focus on these lines exclusively. Keep the older bodies in production as value options and maybe cut the EM1x price to $2k while adjusting everything else to more rational pricing. As good as that camera may be, the pricing largely had it DOA commercially before it arrived to the stores. They can pretend that it competes directly with the A9’s, 1D’s, and Dx cameras of the world but I’m sure most pro sports photographers will disagree.
    For me the Sony success mainly comes from really listening to their customers. If you compare e.g. the A7R3 and the A7R4 then you notice immediately that the total haptic has significantly improved over the past 2 years. It is today on a level where it is hard to complain anymore and this is just in the haptics department. But as we all know that is not the only difference and evolution, more importantly there is also the eye AF that works in Sony cameras meanwhile like in no other brand and I dare to say that others will also in the coming years not come close to that and finally there is the 61MP resolution that is currently not offered by anyone else than Sony, although that will change.

    The Oly EM1X was far too expensive from the very beginning - I maybe had bought it for 2K a year ago, but today I would not even care any longer. What is really overdue is a EM1.3 with a better (newer) sensor (24 to 28MP with better DR and high ISO capabilities) and a very much improved EVF (5.7MP with 120Hz as in the A7R4. If they had such a model ready by early 2020 then I could be convinced to stay with Olympus and not switch to Sony FF. But my hopes have almost vanished and I strongly believe now that we either will never see such a camera from Olympus or if we do so then maybe around 2024 or 2025. And that time span is definitely too long for my liking as I live now and want to use such equipment now and not in 5 to 6 years.

    I hope that these few thought of mine describe now one of the biggest failing points of Olympus today.
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #21
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    4,576
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    For me the Sony success mainly comes from really listening to their customers. If you compare e.g. the A7R3 and the A7R4 then you notice immediately that the total haptic has significantly improved over the past 2 years. It is today on a level where it is hard to complain anymore and this is just in the haptics department. But as we all know that is not the only difference and evolution, more importantly there is also the eye AF that works in Sony cameras meanwhile like in no other brand and I dare to say that others will also in the coming years not come close to that and finally there is the 61MP resolution that is currently not offered by anyone else than Sony, although that will change.

    The Oly EM1X was far too expensive from the very beginning - I maybe had bought it for 2K a year ago, but today I would not even care any longer. What is really overdue is a EM1.3 with a better (newer) sensor (24 to 28MP with better DR and high ISO capabilities) and a very much improved EVF (5.7MP with 120Hz as in the A7R4. If they had such a model ready by early 2020 then I could be convinced to stay with Olympus and not switch to Sony FF. But my hopes have almost vanished and I strongly believe now that we either will never see such a camera from Olympus or if we do so then maybe around 2024 or 2025. And that time span is definitely too long for my liking as I live now and want to use such equipment now and not in 5 to 6 years.

    I hope that these few thought of mine describe now one of the biggest failing points of Olympus today.
    I think Sony has always listened to many of their owner’s concerns. I do believe that we are at the point where perhaps many simply prefer a small size... and that’s fine for most. I happen to have large hands (even for my height) which is what prompted me to want a larger body because some of my client work has indeed changed from when I originally bought into the system. All things equal though, I’m perfectly happy with the results of their cameras though I do get occasion envy of aspects of some other systems... namely Fuji and Panasonic. I still keep a light kit for Micro 4/3 and I regularly go back in forth on adding a GFX.

    In all seriousness I could get by with two A7III’s for all pro work and have a GFX for pro portraits and the rest of my personal work and be entirely fine with that. I wouldn’t mind an updated Sony 50mp sensor with the improved benefits of the GFX100 camera... simply because o find that the GFX 50S is probably as big of a cameras as I’d want to go. I’m in no hurry and my next camera puts chase is likely the Tamron 70-180/2.8 and the next gen Sony bodies to upgrade my existing ones that are 4-6+ years old. Again... I know that Sony takes heat for releasing bodies slightly more frequently but they keep the older ones around as value options.

    As for Olympus, I worry (somewhat) about their long term future but apparently they do much better commercially in Asia than in USA.
    Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  22. #22
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Well my 2 cents, all the stellar lenses from Olympus and PL deserve a better camera, better sensor, and faster, much faster readout time.

    I hadn't shot my E-M5.2 for more than a year.
    Didn't remember much about its user interface.
    But working with it for a couple of hours, it all came back easily.
    Relative to the E-M5.2 the UI of the E-M1.2 is improved.
    I would expect the E-M5.3 to follow that trend.

    At the moment there are 3 cameras that I primarily use, namely Fujifilm GFX 50S, Sony A9 FW version 6.0, and to a lesser degree my Olympus E-M1.2.
    With best regards, K-H.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by k-hawinkler View Post
    Well my 2 cents, all the stellar lenses from Olympus and PL deserve a better camera, better sensor, and faster, much faster readout time.
    <snip
    The sensor readout time for M1m2 and M1x is apparently 1/60. Except for Sony A9 (1/160), all other cameras have 1/15 or slower readout speeds, AFAIK.

    I assume M5m3 has the same readout speed as M1m2.

    IMO, the main disadvantage and advantage of Olympus cameras is the same: the sensor size. The sensor quality of newer Olympus cameras is pretty good. The dynamic range when shooting above ISO 200 is very close to Nikon Z7 numbers.

  24. #24
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    It's been years since I have used a M 4/3 camera, but I think this new Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III may fit the bill for me---and worth trying. I'll wait until the body is finally released and pricing matures.

    I'm simply looking for a small camera to complement my Cambo and IQ4150. I want more than a P&S but need something a bit more capable than a P&S, without taking up a lot of room or weight. One good Olympus lens might be all I buy. I considered other mirrorless options including APC and FF sensors, but I really don't like the 3:2 format and much prefer the 4:3 format better.

    More megapixels would be nice, but not sure if there are other suitable options/candidates to consider?

    ken
    www.houseoflandscapes.com
    www.kendoophotography.com
    www.carmelfineartprinting.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  25. #25
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    It's been years since I have used a M 4/3 camera, but I think this new Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III may fit the bill for me---and worth trying. I'll wait until the body is finally released and pricing matures.

    I'm simply looking for a small camera to complement my Cambo and IQ4150. I want more than a P&S but need something a bit more capable than a P&S, without taking up a lot of room or weight. One good Olympus lens might be all I buy. I considered other mirrorless options including APC and FF sensors, but I really don't like the 3:2 format and much prefer the 4:3 format better.

    More megapixels would be nice, but not sure if there are other suitable options/candidates to consider?

    ken
    Okay.
    What focal length?
    Fast or slow lens?
    With best regards, K-H.

  26. #26
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    I'm thinking the either the Olympus 12-40 or the 12-100 "Pro" lens.

    I'm thinking snapshots and landscape accompanying camera to my Cambo. The high res option on a tripod might be nice for occasional landscapes. The 4:3 ratio makes it easy to visualize how the MFDB will frame. I have no intentions of investing more than 1-3 lenses or a full blown out system----that's not it's intended use/purpose.

    Is the Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III a decent choice, or should I consider other options? Fuji XT series? But I really don't like 3:2 format as well...

    ken
    www.houseoflandscapes.com
    www.kendoophotography.com
    www.carmelfineartprinting.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #27
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    k-hawinkler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The "Land of Enchantment"
    Posts
    4,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    I'm thinking the either the Olympus 12-40 or the 12-100 "Pro" lens.

    I'm thinking snapshots and landscape accompanying camera to my Cambo. The high res option on a tripod might be nice for occasional landscapes. The 4:3 ratio makes it easy to visualize how the MFDB will frame. I have no intentions of investing more than 1-3 lenses or a full blown out system----that's not it's intended use/purpose.

    Is the Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III a decent choice, or should I consider other options? Fuji XT series? But I really don't like 3:2 format as well...

    ken

    My E-M1.2 has the same sensor as the new E-M1X and now the brand new E-M5.3. For me that was the first mirrorless camera without focus hunting issues. So in m43 land I wouldn’t go back to a lesser camera.

    In terms of lenses I have the excellent Olympus 7-14/2.8 Pro, 12-40/2.8 Pro, and the 40-150/2.8 Pro (pretty large lens). I don’t have the 12-100/4Pro. If I intended only to have one lens it would have to be the 12-100/4 Pro.

    There are also a few fast primes.
    Olympus 17/1.2, 25/1.2, 45/1.2 Pro, and 75/1.8, and the 60/2.8 macro lens.
    I am happy with the PL 42.5/1.2 so didn’t see the need to also get the 45/1.2.
    With best regards, K-H.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  28. #28
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Shashin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    150

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    Is the Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III a decent choice, or should I consider other options? Fuji XT series? But I really don't like 3:2 format as well...

    ken
    That is a difficult call. I started my personal digital photography with Olympus m4/3 and have certainly recommended them to others. The image quality can be very good. And if you like the 4:3 ratio, there is not much choice.

    However, I am shooting a Fuji X-series camera. The X Pro2 with a handful of lenses. Like you, I never gravitated to the 3:2 format, but I have to say that has changed after putting time into my Fuji. I also shoot 1:1 and 16:9 with my X Pro2, which has become my multi-format camera (it is still a 16MP image at 1:1). I really like the fuji optics.

    Since those system were separated by a significant amount of time, I will not compare the image quality directly.

    I guess if I were looking for a really compact system, the m4/3 would be my choice. If I were looking for a small portable system, then I would look at APS-C as well. The Fuji is basically my travel system.

    This is the best article I know of that puts m4/3 into context. It is from a professional adventure photographer and starts with 35mm cameras, but keep going toward the bottom where he discusses m4/3.

    https://alpineexposures.com/phototip...ch-camera-gear

    If you want more insight into the Fuji system, I would check out Andy Mumford's blog. He is a Fuji ambassador, but he primarily shoots with the X-system for landscape photography. He is a good photographer and gives some compelling arguments.

    https://www.andymumford.com/blog

    I kind of have a love/hate relationship with "cameras I can take everywhere." Some have been really portable, but not really satisfying to use. Others have been great to use, but a pain to carry. Personally, Fuji was the sweet spot for me: X Pro2, 14mm, 23mm, and 50mm lenses. But the m4/3 could be that too. Naturally, the optical finder in the Fuji is what attracted me to the system and there is not much competition. I would try to get my hands on these cameras and lenses.

    Also, as you well know, your skills as a photographer will be a greater factor in the final image quality than any difference in sensor size or specs. Who knows, perhaps they will help you kick the MFD habit! Just think how much money and back break you could save...
    Will

    http://www.hakusancreation.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #29
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    I'm thinking the either the Olympus 12-40 or the 12-100 "Pro" lens.

    I'm thinking snapshots and landscape accompanying camera to my Cambo. The high res option on a tripod might be nice for occasional landscapes. The 4:3 ratio makes it easy to visualize how the MFDB will frame. I have no intentions of investing more than 1-3 lenses or a full blown out system----that's not it's intended use/purpose.

    Is the Olympus OM-D Mark 5 III a decent choice, or should I consider other options? Fuji XT series? But I really don't like 3:2 format as well...

    ken
    Hi Ken!

    I am shooting m43 for years now as my only system and I have an EM1.2 and a number of the Olympus Pro lenses. I like them all!

    I think the EM5.3 is a great camera, basically a mini EM1.2 with a much improved EVF (still 2.4MP but great OLED display) and if you want one lens to go with it I would take the 2.8/12-40 which is absolutely stellar.

    The downside of Olympus (and any m43) is the small sensor as this limits resolution as well as stellar high ISO performance. This is why I would choose today the Fuji X system over m43 - I shot several Fuji cameras and lenses over the past years and actually thinking now about that I liked these more than my m43 system. The APSC sized sensor is a huge advantage, especially looking into the future as I can foresee some 32MP resolution sooner than later, which will almost for sure not come in m43 territory over the next 10 years - hugh...

    Today if I were looking for a small camera (system) to complement MFD I would go Fuji XT3 with either the 18-55 or the 16-80 zoom or if you want really small take one of the excellent and weather resistant F2 primes. And you always could expand that system even to a complete sports or wedding or what else setup.

    This from a year long m43 user who kind of lost trust and interest in the future of m43.
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  30. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    20
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Hi Ken!

    I am shooting m43 for years now as my only system and I have an EM1.2 and a number of the Olympus Pro lenses. I like them all!

    I think the EM5.3 is a great camera, basically a mini EM1.2 with a much improved EVF (still 2.4MP but great OLED display) and if you want one lens to go with it I would take the 2.8/12-40 which is absolutely stellar.

    The downside of Olympus (and any m43) is the small sensor as this limits resolution as well as stellar high ISO performance. This is why I would choose today the Fuji X system over m43 - I shot several Fuji cameras and lenses over the past years and actually thinking now about that I liked these more than my m43 system. The APSC sized sensor is a huge advantage, especially looking into the future as I can foresee some 32MP resolution sooner than later, which will almost for sure not come in m43 territory over the next 10 years - hugh...

    Today if I were looking for a small camera (system) to complement MFD I would go Fuji XT3 with either the 18-55 or the 16-80 zoom or if you want really small take one of the excellent and weather resistant F2 primes. And you always could expand that system even to a complete sports or wedding or what else setup.

    This from a year long m43 user who kind of lost trust and interest in the future of m43.
    I don't really get the emphasis placed on the difference in sensor size between M43 and APS-C. Ever since my first 35mm film camera I've cropped off the sides of 3:2 so for me the comparison needs to be normalised to 4:3 (even that is quite "rectangular" compared to 4x5, 10x8). On that basis M43 is 221 sq.mm and Fuji becomes 15.6 x 20.8, i.e. 324 sq.mm, approximately 50% bigger. Hardly comparable with the difference between APS-C and "FF" and yet I've heard of people, possible the same people, hail Fuji APS-C as the "new full-frame".
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  31. #31
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    4,768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    Quote Originally Posted by eddystone View Post
    I don't really get the emphasis placed on the difference in sensor size between M43 and APS-C. Ever since my first 35mm film camera I've cropped off the sides of 3:2 so for me the comparison needs to be normalised to 4:3 (even that is quite "rectangular" compared to 4x5, 10x8). On that basis M43 is 221 sq.mm and Fuji becomes 15.6 x 20.8, i.e. 324 sq.mm, approximately 50% bigger. Hardly comparable with the difference between APS-C and "FF" and yet I've heard of people, possible the same people, hail Fuji APS-C as the "new full-frame".
    I never said that I am preferring 3:2 over 4:3, so this would be my least important argument to prefer Fuji over m43. What makes Fuji for me so enjoyable are

    1) their approach to photography (and meanwhile also videography)
    2) their color science, and although the Oly CS is pretty excellent, I occasionally prefer Fuji color from certain film simulations - just easier than applying my own presets
    3) their innovation - also comes down to much more frequent releases of new cameras and sensors as the current X-Trans4 in the X-T3, X-T30 and now X-Pro3, while Olympus (and actually also Panasonic) still stick with their 4 year old 20MP sensor that is not even BSI

    Olympus is not bad at all, I just am a bit tired of their slow cycle of innovation - and when they innovate it is with lenses like that soon TBA 150-400, which will be in the €7-8K price range and definitely not in the range of what I want and can spend.

    WRT Panasonic - except the GH2 many years ago I never shot Panasonic m43 anymore and I do not regret this.

    I hope this answers clearly why today rather Fuji than Olympus for me.

    PS1: Oh and BTW FF - we all know that FF requires also much bigger lenses! And if I would go FF again than there are 2 systems to consider from my side - Sony FE and Nikon Z. But I so far could not find enough arguments for me to move FF again. But hey, never say never again.

    PS2: WRT MFD - I left MF with my Hasselblad 39MP back ten years ago and while I know (as I hope most others here) the advantages of MF, these are not so important for me that I would go back that route again in my life - so this is a clear NO - for who it may concern
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  32. #32
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    8,810
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    I still have my Olympus E-M1. Yes, it's obsoleted by newer models, models which have more features, more pixels, etc etc. Doesn't matter to me at all. Like the Olympus E-1 that I also still have, it's an excellent camera that I like a heck of a lot and is barely worth the effort it takes to put it on the market and sell.

    I actually like the user interface and vast menu system. It gives options and such that no others of my cameras ever had or have. The Olympus Zuiko Digital lenses I have that I use on both of these cameras are superb. The photographs I've made with both of them are satisfying: great quality and very saleable if I were still interested in that (I sold and licensed hundreds if not thousands of them when I was still running my photo business).

    I don't use either very much at present. I've been more involved in using my Leica lenses on APS-C and FF for the past few years, and in shooting mostly medium format film. And I'm soon to have the MFDigital Hasselblad 907x Special Edition because it suits what I'm doing photographically right now.

    Will I ever get back to using the Olympus cameras a good bit? I don't know, but given the resurrection of my interest in shooting Minox 8x11 format film in recent weeks, I can't say no or never. Each camera sees differently, and when a camera's way of seeing aligns with my interests in seeing, I use it. I am loathe to dispense with my Olympus cameras and lenses because they have unique qualities and capabilities that others of my cameras do not.

    Far as I'm concerned, these cameras are about as good as eternal as any other cameras are. As long as the batteries are available and the sensors work, they just keep on going. They're never going to produce work any better than they could the day they were made, like any other camera, but if that was good enough, then they'll still be good enough.

    It was, it will be.

    Sorry for the ruminations...

    G
    Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  33. #33
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Em5iii

    I still have several months before I will even consider a small camera purchase. After digesting some of the different offerings, my thinking is now closer to Peter's (are you scared yet, Peter? )

    It's not so much the "size" of the sensor as it is the aspect ratio that I like about the Olympus. But I am now more seriously considering the Fuji XT30, which is almost a mirror of the XT3 in a smaller package. And the size of the XT30 is similar to the OMD Mark 5 III.
    Had Olympus offered a new cutting edge m4/3 sensor it might be a different outcome. But imo, it seems the Fuji offers a better BSI CMOS sensor in a similar small package. Too bad Fuji doesn't offer the ability to choose shooting in the 4:3 aspect---only 1:1, 2:3, and 16:9.

    I'm still firmly seated with my Cambo and IQ4. The Fuji just may be the better compliment at this time for me.

    Ken

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •