helenhill
Senior Member
I couldn't AGREE more with ya Woody
Don, I am better understanding the Toe/Shoulder Ideal which Jack Flesher has
recently explained to Me
Best-hThe GetDPI Photography Forum
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
How about more and more fun with Leica M? (Film)
- Thread starter Cindy Flood
- Start date
Don, I am better understanding the Toe/Shoulder Ideal which Jack Flesher has
recently explained to Me
Best-h
N
nei1
Guest
My oldest
Its those blown highlights that just finnish digital as a serious medium for me.Ive put in a few posts to see if anyone has an opinion on a black and white sensor such as was available from kodak and is still available as a mf back,would this overcome the problem?
Its those blown highlights that just finnish digital as a serious medium for me.Ive put in a few posts to see if anyone has an opinion on a black and white sensor such as was available from kodak and is still available as a mf back,would this overcome the problem?
Last edited:
emmawest72
New member
He was just back from school and was immediately forced out in the garden so I could try the new kodak Ektar 100 film...
M4-2 and 35mm, scanned with epson v700/ silverfast.
M4-2 and 35mm, scanned with epson v700/ silverfast.
N
nei1
Guest
even your accidents are interesting Helen
woodyspedden
New member
Great skin tones. Did you have to do a lot of post processing to get the colors right or was this basically "out of the camera."He was just back from school and was immediately forced out in the garden so I could try the new kodak Ektar 100 film...
M4-2 and 35mm, scanned with epson v700/ silverfast.
Woody
emmawest72
New member
Hi Woody,
These are almost straigt out of camera/scanner. I used silverfast to scan the neg and then only did a resize/ small curve adjustment plus slight sharpen for web. I'm quite surprised because I have read that the new ektar is not too good for people shots. Anyway I like it.
Cheers,
These are almost straigt out of camera/scanner. I used silverfast to scan the neg and then only did a resize/ small curve adjustment plus slight sharpen for web. I'm quite surprised because I have read that the new ektar is not too good for people shots. Anyway I like it.
Cheers,
leif e
New member
Hello all!
I´m absolutely new to this forum - 3 hours? - and fell for this thread and the non-M cousin at once.
The image is from a series of images on football (soccer) fans I´ve been working on for a while: the magic night late last autumn when we won the Norwegian series. :grin:
M4-P, CV 1,9/28, Tri-X at 1600 or 3200 (not sure) developed in XTOL.
I´m absolutely new to this forum - 3 hours? - and fell for this thread and the non-M cousin at once.
The image is from a series of images on football (soccer
) fans I´ve been working on for a while: the magic night late last autumn when we won the Norwegian series. :grin:M4-P, CV 1,9/28, Tri-X at 1600 or 3200 (not sure) developed in XTOL.
Last edited:
Nice!!!Hello all!
I´m absolutely new to this forum - 3 hours? - and fell for this thread and the non-M cousin at once.
The image is from a series of images on football (soccer
M4-P, CV 1,9/28, Tri-X at 1600 or 3200 (not sure) developed in XTOL.
Lloyd
Active member
Beauty. And it looks like a great celebration.Hello all!
I´m absolutely new to this forum - 3 hours? - and fell for this thread and the non-M cousin at once.
The image is from a series of images on football (soccer
M4-P, CV 1,9/28, Tri-X at 1600 or 3200 (not sure) developed in XTOL.
Lloyd
Active member
M6ttl, 35 'Cron ASPH; 400cn, and this is the drugstore scan. I'll play later with the negative to see what it's got.
View attachment 13940
View attachment 13940
Last edited:
emmawest72
New member
LLoyd,
there seem to be potential but the drugstore scan has completely destroyed the pic. On my screen it looks heavily oversharpened and they also seem to have applied some noise reduction(???). Make sure to scan it yourself as I'm sure the neg looks fine.
Cheers,
there seem to be potential but the drugstore scan has completely destroyed the pic. On my screen it looks heavily oversharpened and they also seem to have applied some noise reduction(???). Make sure to scan it yourself as I'm sure the neg looks fine.
Cheers,
Lloyd
Active member
Thank you for your comments, William. Most appreciated.
I am anxious to see what my own scan will reveal. Don't know how they scan, but I just picked up the film, and was anxious to post something here.
The oversharpening may be my doing, I reduced this for web viewing and then applied a "sharpen for web" action I use for M8 files. Together with the sharpening the forum applies, it does look like too much.
Here's another file from this roll. Also the drugstore scan.
Noctilux:
View attachment 13941
Last edited:
emmawest72
New member
Yeah, this one looks much better. Nice bike!
Lloyd
Active member
Thank you. Beyond photography, cycling is my other passion.
Lloyd
Active member
Ok, here's another attempt. Same image as above, but scanned in my Nikon Super CoolScan 4000. Don't know how the scratches got on the negative; pretty disappointing. (no sharpening this time.)
View attachment 13986
View attachment 13986
Last edited:
Hi Lloyd. I'm glad that you posted the two pics. I've been wondering what the lab would do to my negs if I let them scan them--after I scan them of course! But mainly to see what my pics would look like if I didn't do my digital darkroom.
I'd be curious to know more about your scanning and post processing. I use a Coolscan V and Vuescan and am learning something different just about everyday.
Leif, that is a great shot!
I'd be curious to know more about your scanning and post processing. I use a Coolscan V and Vuescan and am learning something different just about everyday.
Leif, that is a great shot!