I am thinking about getting a small DSLR for everyday walk around use. I use a Canon 5D as my main camera and love it. I often put a small prime on it, and am a happy camper (a 28mm f1.8, 35mm f2, or 50mm f1.4). . . . I previously owned the Rebel XTI, and found it substantially smaller, than the 5D, but after about 9 months sold it because the viewfinder was too small and, at the end of the day, the camera/lens wasn't all that small because I primarily used a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 lens on it. . . I started looking at a Pentax DSLR on the Pentax limited and pancake primes (including the just announced 15mm f4 limited), and started thinking there might be another way. But then it becomes a house of cards -- why not look at an Oly 520 (image stabilization makes this much preferrable to the 420, to me) and the 14-42mm? This is smaller body-wise than the Pentax options, and a lot less expensive than starting to buy the Pentax primes. I sort of see it as the next step in size from a Canon G10, which wouldn't cut it for me quality wise. If I'm looking at zooms, then why not the xSI and the 18-55mm IS zoom? (I know why I rejected this option when I had the xti -- I didn't like the feel of the zoom -- it was plasticky and cheap feeling -- what's the point of a smaller walk around camera that you're afraid of bumping; and I didn't like the xti viewfinder.) . . . How are the viewfinders on the Pentax K200? I've heard the Oly viewfinders are also very small. The xsi is supposed to have a much better viewfinder than the xti, right? Thanks for any insights -- suggestions. I expect at the end I'll just stay with the Canon 5D, and pick up a Mark II in 6 months or so.