Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Ohhhhh there are . It all depends on how you define NSFW and what kind of gear waters your mouth .Thank heavens there are no NSFW "portraits of your gear". :ROTFL:
Matt -- I had read the SL was big, but your photo really shows how much smaller it is than the S. I know which camera I would take if I was was going on a walking trip in Europe or anywhere else. Over the last several years, as I've aged into my mid-60s, I've come to appreciate the pleasure of traveling with and carrying lighter gear.Not a portrait, just a snapshot. I'm trying to decide which system to take on a walking trip in Europe. Every time I use the SL, I wish I'd used the S, but the S and 3 primes weigh twice as much as the SL+WATE+zoom.
:banghead:,
Matt
Whoops! I'd deleted that post as I was going to take a better picture of the two cameras. In the meantime, here it is again:Matt -- I had read the SL was big, but your photo really shows how much smaller it is than the S. I know which camera I would take if I was was going on a walking trip in Europe or anywhere else. Over the last several years, as I've aged into my mid-60s, I've come to appreciate the pleasure of traveling with and carrying lighter gear.
Gary
This is so true, and one of the reasons why I use m4/3 for travel and good, old Nikon DSLRs for 8 hours around the race track.But that S sure looks pretty. But that is the dilemma--cameras that feel good in the hands, don't always feel good around the neck or in the bag. Still, I err to the "in the hands" thing. If a camera is not satisfying to use, it probably does not get used.