I apologize for posting this before finishing, and when I have time I will complete it, but today's model Sasha had some interesting poses.
This is one example.
View attachment 18948
-bob
This is one example.
View attachment 18948
-bob
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I post nudes and nobody peeps,What's up with the clothing Bob? I thought that you preferred au natural like me!:thumbup:
I like the pose but the lighting isn't working for me on this one.
doesn't mean that we didn't look.I post nudes and nobody peeps,
As the caveman said: different, gooood, clothes no goodSo I post one with clothing and now you complain? sheesh!
Well, I thought I would try something different.
Depending on the angle I was shooting her, I would go loop or have a fill if I was side lighting (edit) I'd lower the main and bring it down closer to her, maybe get some interesting shadows, she's a very unique model who can control her body too, would have been nice to see more of her...I have been playing lately with side and rim lighting, so that is how I was set up.
-bob
I think the lighting you used is a great start -- it gives a terrific sense of sculptural mass and volume. (Mass and volume aren't always what young women want in their photos, but it looks as if this model is comfortable with displaying her own form of beauty.)I have been playing lately with side and rim lighting, so that is how I was set up.
What lighting would you have preferred?
Care to explain why nudity would submerge ideas?Incidentally, I'm glad you did NOT shoot this picture as a nude... that would have made the picture all about the nudity, and any other ideas would have gotten submerged in that...
Well, this particular angle given her build, nude might have not looked as good.Care to explain why nudity would submerge ideas?
It is interesting that lately more young women seem to be comfortable with displaying their musculature. Form and Mass may be getting more fashionable at least for the trim.I think the lighting you used is a great start -- it gives a terrific sense of sculptural mass and volume. (Mass and volume aren't always what young women want in their photos, but it looks as if this model is comfortable with displaying her own form of beauty.)
The way I see it, the picture you've made is all about contrasting ideas of strength. (Which sounds better than saying it's all about cleavage!) Classical dancing is supposed to look effortless, but making it look effortless requires a tremendous amount of hidden strength. By making that strength visible, you're unifying two contrasting concepts visually, which is almost always a cool idea for making photographs!
Incidentally, I'm glad you did NOT shoot this picture as a nude... that would have made the picture all about the nudity, and any other ideas would have gotten submerged in that...
You're not giving yourself enough credit Bob, I'm sure if you put your head to it you'll come up with some creative ways to shoot her without making it about T&A, if that's what you're worried about.Well, this particular angle given her build, nude might have not looked as good.
I plan to shoot some implied of her later this summer.
Happy to. One view of information theory says that information consists essentially of surprises; if it only tells you what expected to hear, it isn't really information. (This is why image compression works, for example: you can drop out the pixels whose values can be predicted, and store just the ones whose values can't be predicted.)Care to explain why nudity would submerge ideas?
:sleep006: :sleep006: :sleep006:Happy to. One view of information theory ...
...Still, there's no denying that ambiguity requires more of the mind's processing horsepower. Dump too much workload on it, and it's going to have to skip over some of the nuances. That's why nudity can submerge other aesthetic elements in an artwork, and why it can be a good choice to leave that element out of the equation. QED.
You forgot about Jesus, people don't dwell on his nudity, and isn't Obama the new Messiah? :toocool:If that's not convincing enough for you, try this simple thought experiment: Imagine that President Obama has decided to have his official executive photo done as a full frontal nude. How much public-discussion bandwidth do you think would be consumed before people in general got around to such observations as, "Good Lord, his teeth look really yellow"...?
That's why I was careful to say "can be" and "choice." And you'll notice that while the two photographers you mention certainly employ ambiguity in their work, they carefully control how much and what kind. That's what separates art from noise.Fortunately Eikoh Hosoe, Connie Imboden and many others never heard of your theories otherwise they would have never produced any work.
LOL Ranger 9, its July 4th, too much typing and reading already. :salute:That's why I was careful to say "can be" and "choice." And you'll notice that while the two photographers you mention certainly employ ambiguity in their work, they carefully control how much and what kind. That's what separates art from noise.
Repeat after me: "Read, then type. Read, then type. Read, then type..."