Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New Sigma lenses

  1. #1
    Senior Member hot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    2,169
    Post Thanks / Like

    New Sigma lenses

    Sigma 105/2.8 with OS looks good ...

    SIGMA MACRO 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM



    SIGMA 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 II DG HSM



    SIGMA APO 50-150mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM



    SIGMA APO 120-300mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM


  2. #2
    Member RGoldman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    202
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma lenses

    I have owned several of the "EX" Sigma lenses and every one of them is/was a stellar performer. The 120-300mm was incredible for the price and the only thing it needed was "OS" which it now will have. If they add OS to the 300-800mm lens as well, they will sell a lot more of them.
    I recently picked up the new 50-500mm OS version and I can highly recommend it for the times when you can or only want to carry one lens with you. It's truly amazing when you consider the range it covers.

    Ron

  3. #3
    Member Ralfsworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma lenses

    I bought new 70-200 with OS last month and found working really good with my 1D Mark IV. Wonder how good is SIGMA APO 120-300mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM?
    www.ralfsworld.com HBL H1, P 30+, HC 80/2,8 & HC 35/3,5, Canon 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III, Sony A7/R, 400/2,8 L IS USM, 16-35/2,8 L USM II, FE 55/1,8, FE 24-70/4, Sigma EX 70-200/2,8 APO DG HSM OS, Sigma EX 120-300/2,8 APO DG HSM OS, 50 F/1,4, 15/2,8 Fish-eye...

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    764
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma lenses

    I had three copies of the 120-300 2.8 it took three till I got one that was not very flawed. I kept it for a year then realized it simply was not up to the canon l series in terms of real sharpness. Photos just did not pop. also the af on canon was not up to par, it was slow. They are better I hear onnikons. The 120-300 is also a little short at the 300 rating more like a 285.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •