Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 117

Thread: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

  1. #51
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by asabet View Post
    There is a Japanese poster in the DPReview forums named dHitman who predicted the 18-200 IS back in April (though he said it would be bundled with the 450D), and judging from his posts may also have had a bit of advanced word on the 50D. He says the 5D replacement is a 21MP camera. Not outside the realm of possibility IMO.

    Not at all actually. Would make the lack of pro AF almost worth it!
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  2. #52
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Well time to place your bets...

    The 40D replacement, the 50D, is now official so the 5d replacement cannot be far behind. Now here is what is interesting: the 50D has 15MP (4.7u pixels), new Digic IV, 6 frames per second and expanded ISO 6400 and 12,500...

    My money says that if Canon can do all that on the crop sensor, it bodes very well indeed for the specs on the 5D replacement
    The first night I had my D700 and was shooting at a party, there was someone there from Canon Imaging that insisted that the new 5D would blow away the D700. It will be interesting to see what they come up with. I'm happy with my choice but camera improvement keep moving the bar higher and that is a good thing.

  3. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.S. Canada
    Posts
    2,010
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    A 21 MP 5DII, I can see it now - forums filled with cries of 'soft' images from folks slapping their xxxx L zoom on their new baby and wondering where the hell the resolution went.

  4. #54
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    21MP in a 5D replacement would make a lot of sense. No pro AF or weather sealing to compete with the 1Ds III. Not enough frames per second to compete with the 1D III or its replacement (which will likely be a lower MP full frame model). It would also compete well with the D700 without the need for pro AF or weather sealing.

  5. #55
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by robmac View Post
    A 21 MP 5DII, I can see it now - forums filled with cries of 'soft' images from folks slapping their xxxx L zoom on their new baby and wondering where the hell the resolution went.
    Maybe, or maybe not. If some of the new tech, like the redesigned microlenses and Digic IV processing works out, Canon may be able to reduce the AA filter and not lose so much detail at the higher pixel density of smaller size. There are laws of physics about some things, but I am not convinced we have hit the wall on all of them yet. What if they were able to unleash a 21MP camera with FF sensor that did deliver detail without "mushiness" at high ISOs? That seems doable, but we will have to wait and see. The images it and others produce will tell the story, not the marketing hype

    LJ

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.S. Canada
    Posts
    2,010
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    If they skinny-out the AA filter, etc, etc it might work. What I am assuming is that we will see the current tech as per the 1Ds3. Given that C and N seem emotionally attached to AA filters, my expectations aren't high.

    So far the 50D doesn't look like they've reacted (or had time to react) as many would have hoped (e.g. radically) to the 'new' Nikon.

    I do think they need to be a tad careful releasing a vastly new & improved 21MP sensor at a pro-sumer price to soon after the 1Ds3. I don't think a lot of natives would take that well ;> This is of course assuming it's a 21MP sensor in the first place...

    That said, ya never know. And, as you say, it will take months before we know if the various packages work as advertised - and within what limits.
    Last edited by robmac; 26th August 2008 at 07:22.

  7. #57
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Canon makes the 1 series for pros, and most working pros already own the latest 1's. While the market is not saturated, it is likely 90% of the folks who were ever going to buy a new one already have. Thus, the delayed release of the new 5 makes sense; fill the pipeline with the runner-up...

    However, Canon arrogance finally bit them in the butt --- the mistake they made was waiting too long, as they have clearly lost a significant share of the market to Nikon, a share they will have a tough time recovering unless the new 5D is something spectacular in terms of ISO, AA filter and improved IQ...

    Personally I waited so am not affected, and will go with the new 5D regardless simply because the lenses both mount and manual-focus in the correct direction. In 25 years of shooting Nikon, I *never* really overcame those two issues... My dyslexic right-brain I guess.

    PS: My bet is on 18MP or thereabouts, being less than 20 for marketing reasons against the 1DS3. The practical difference in 18 and 22 on full-frame DSLR is going to be insignificant since few lenses are good enough anyway...

    ,
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  8. #58
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post

    PS: My bet is on 18MP or thereabouts, being less than 20 for marketing reasons against the 1DS3. The practical difference in 18 and 22 on full-frame DSLR is going to be insignificant since few lenses are good enough anyway...

    ,

    I guess you're right.
    I find it fascinating that Canon set so much store of making sure that a camera doesn't compete with it's bigger brother (no weather sealing on the 50D for instance).

    Nikon on the other hand really do seem to bring out the best camera they can for the money. I think that's probably where they have done so well in the last year.

    The focusing issue is interesting - I hear what you say, but maybe us brits are so used to having to swap everything around everytime we drive in another country - it seems to me like very much the same sort of transition.

    Just this guy you know

  9. #59
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Of course with that much resolution you run into serious diffraction issues. Might be worth keeping at least one of my original 5D's just for when I have to stop down past f11!
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Again, this may or may not be the case. With the past and existing sensors and how they were configured with different microlenses, we could see diffraction limits kicking in, especially with overaggressive AA filters. If Canon, and this is a big if, went to a newer sensor design (like placing the electronics beneath the photosites rather than inside as most CMOS sensors are built), and if the microlenses are reconfigured to better match the photosites on the sensors, it may be very possible to reduce some of those diffraction issues the kick in hard on some smaller pixel sensors now.

    Until we start to see actual results, it may be premature to dismiss what this newer camera may or may not be able to do. I am not being a fanboy or anything like that here, as that is not my nature by a long shot. I just think that folks may want to hold judgment and decisions a bit longer until they actually see what some of the newer tech really is able to deliver. It may not amount to anything different, or it could be a very significant improvement that starts to rewrite some of our "rules" about how capable some things may be. My first inclination is to agree that diffraction could become a player, but I am not convinced it will be until we start to see actual shots. Even on the MF side of things where they have a lot more sensor real estate to work with, pixels are getting smaller, and IQ is not getting worse.

    LJ

  11. #61
    Subscriber & Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,178
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    414

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Despite all the well deserved fanfare over the recent Nikon releases, I have not sold my R to EOS adapters or my C/Y to EOS adapters yet!

  12. #62
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by LJL View Post
    Again, this may or may not be the case. With the past and existing sensors and how they were configured with different microlenses, we could see diffraction limits kicking in, especially with overaggressive AA filters. If Canon, and this is a big if, went to a newer sensor design (like placing the electronics beneath the photosites rather than inside as most CMOS sensors are built), and if the microlenses are reconfigured to better match the photosites on the sensors, it may be very possible to reduce some of those diffraction issues the kick in hard on some smaller pixel sensors now.

    Until we start to see actual results, it may be premature to dismiss what this newer camera may or may not be able to do. I am not being a fanboy or anything like that here, as that is not my nature by a long shot. I just think that folks may want to hold judgment and decisions a bit longer until they actually see what some of the newer tech really is able to deliver. It may not amount to anything different, or it could be a very significant improvement that starts to rewrite some of our "rules" about how capable some things may be. My first inclination is to agree that diffraction could become a player, but I am not convinced it will be until we start to see actual shots. Even on the MF side of things where they have a lot more sensor real estate to work with, pixels are getting smaller, and IQ is not getting worse.

    LJ
    I quite agree. I think there is a way to go with sensor technology and smaller phototsites. A few years ago the D3 would have been unthinkable.

    Just this guy you know

  13. #63
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    Of course with that much resolution you run into serious diffraction issues. Might be worth keeping at least one of my original 5D's just for when I have to stop down past f11!
    Hi Ben, this is a common misconception about the effects of diffraction. A given lens is diffraction limited at a particular f-stop independent of sensor pixel pitch. Smaller pixels mean that lens diffraction becomes limiting to overall resolution capture at a lower f-stop, but this is only because there is enough sensor resolution to perceive the lens diffraction. If the sensor pixels are large, then sensor pixels are the weak link; ie, the pixel pitch will limit capture to a lower resolution than the limit otherwise imposed by diffraction. If the sensor pixels are small, then they will no longer be resolution limiting and diffraction comes more into play.

    For example, a typical zoom might be diffraction limited at f/8. The Canon 5D user won't notice the diffraction effects until f/16, whereas a 1Ds III user will notice detail loss at f/11 only because they had the higher detail to begin with! At the higher f-numbers, one loses some of the resolution advantage of the smaller pixel pitch, but at no point does it become a resolution disadvantage.

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    I quite agree. I think there is a way to go with sensor technology and smaller phototsites. A few years ago the D3 would have been unthinkable.
    Hi Jono, I agree also. However, if the Canon 50D has a real 1-1.5 stop advantage over the 40D in high ISO noise (as claimed by Chuck Westfall), then we are talking about a dramatic step forward. The 50D has a pixel pitch similar to the E-420. This kind of technology leap would give the E-420 a D300 quality high ISO performance.
    Last edited by asabet; 26th August 2008 at 13:41.

  14. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.S. Canada
    Posts
    2,010
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Agree that sensor tech will obviously keep moving fwd to try and squeeze the best balance of resolution vs noise vs DR, etc on a given chunk of sensor real estate.

    That said, I do wish C would spend more effort improving the non-sensor aspects of their DSLRs (ergonomics, switchology, ease of MLU, customizable function buttons, etc) - and on their shorter glass (and QC of same).

    That said, when you look at where the AVERAGE customer apparently puts THEIR priorities (a.k.a. $$$): ever more MP on same sensor (even though never need them) + noise-free, flash-free, images of black cats in coal cellars at midnight using wide-range IS zooms, one could also argue they are focused where they should be - from a sales perspective.
    Last edited by robmac; 27th August 2008 at 05:27.

  15. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    California/Thailand
    Posts
    1,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Rob,

    I agree, but how hard would it be to offer a firmware hack that allowed us to use the print button as a user programmed button? I've never met a single person to have used the print button, nor read of it in consumer forums, flickr groups, etc. Sure I'm probably missing something, but literally hundreds of people ask for it to be programable as MLU.

    I'm thinking (hoping) that between Photokina and the show in Feb. '09 that Canon will shake off the fog and step up on several issues.

  16. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Dale,
    I have to agree with you here. My personal thoughts about why Canon is so brickheaded about the "Print" button go to some odd internal agreement within the company or something between the printer division and the camera division. All of the cameras have or get this button that I have yet to see anybody outside of a Canon printer commercial use.

    If they insist on its presence, then offer the user programable option for another button, or just put a new button on just for that purpose so folks could program it to MLU, or whatever else they wanted/needed that could be programmed.

    LJ

  17. #67
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dale Allyn View Post
    Rob,

    I agree, but how hard would it be to offer a firmware hack that allowed us to use the print button as a user programmed button? I've never met a single person to have used the print button, nor read of it in consumer forums, flickr groups, etc. Sure I'm probably missing something, but literally hundreds of people ask for it to be programable as MLU.

    I'm thinking (hoping) that between Photokina and the show in Feb. '09 that Canon will shake off the fog and step up on several issues.
    The 50D allows you to use that button for a user defined function so I can't imagine it won't be on all of their higher end cameras going forward.

  18. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    California/Thailand
    Posts
    1,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Thanks, Terry, I didn't realize that about the 50D. It would be great if it is also on the 5D update.

  19. #69
    Senior Subscriber Member Mike Hatam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Gatos, CA
    Posts
    853
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    236

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Here is what I've heard...

    Canon EOS 7D
    16-21MP FF sensor
    Digic IV
    9-point AF (all cross-type)
    Also shoots HD video!
    6 fps
    1.5 stops improvement in noise over 5D
    All the other "goodies" from the 50D (new LCD, live-view modes, micro AF adjustments, etc)

    I believe we'll see this camera announced on Tuesday, September 16th.

    I hear that Canon also has another D-SLR to be announced this fall. I don't think it's a 1-series, but don't know any more details.

    Mike
    Mike Hatam
    Sony A99, RX1, RX100

  20. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.S. Canada
    Posts
    2,010
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    The DP button on the 50 can be programmed, but if they weren't so $%^ idiotic, you could be programmed (in combo with a second key press) for more than 1 function. It's progress, but that has to be the least used button in Canon camera history. Still don't think it can be used for MLU, though I think you cna move MLU further up the menus stack.

    5DII -- Sounds like they're using the gapless micro lenses. Will be interesting to see what they do re: the AA filter. As for the AF system - we'll have to see.

  21. #71
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Sidebar: Jono --- *LOVE* the "Strawberry Moose" avatar!!!
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  22. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Mike,
    Hope your specs and dates are right. With respect to the HD movies.....if true, let's hope they get it a bit more right than Nikon with the D90, with respect to frame rate and audio capture (stereo mics, or at least a stereo jack). I really do NOT expect that, but it would be a definite nice touch. This is a high end still camera, so that SHOULD be the focus, and not try to do everything with respect to movies. However, folks are picking up things like the Canon S5 and using that, since it takes very nice stills, and is able to record very good quality video with stereo sound, all in a more modest package and price range. Not 35mm FF image capture for sure, but a nice mix of still and good video for casual use.

    While it is interesting to see the melding of the two media (still and video) into one device, and as some predict, that may become the way of the future, personally, I am happy carry two separate devices that each does a great job, rather than one device that does two "O.K." jobs. Just my opinion. (I have found that it takes a completely different "headset" to shoot each, and combining them into a single device, though convenient, does not really change the capture/composition planning and such. The RED camera can do an outstanding job on the video while each frame is usable as a good still also, but at a huge cost. At the prices we are quibbling over for DSLRs, we should not be expecting that same sort of capability for a long time to come.)

    LJ

  23. #73
    rexyinc
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Just spoke to one of the engineers ( his a mate and client of mine ) of the upcoming 3d & 7d's ( the 5d replacements ) he said they will look into adding HD video to the next generation.. ie: way too late now to add a major feature like this to the units pitty as I had a whole list of 'must haves' I wanted added to the video feature.. and the res is about 16mps. just relax for another two weeks okays.

    Tony


    Quote Originally Posted by hatam View Post
    Here is what I've heard...

    Canon EOS 7D
    16-21MP FF sensor
    Digic IV
    9-point AF (all cross-type)
    Also shoots HD video!
    6 fps
    1.5 stops improvement in noise over 5D
    All the other "goodies" from the 50D (new LCD, live-view modes, micro AF adjustments, etc)

    I believe we'll see this camera announced on Tuesday, September 16th.

    I hear that Canon also has another D-SLR to be announced this fall. I don't think it's a 1-series, but don't know any more details.

    Mike

  24. #74
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Interesting that you are using plural replacements. That's one thing that might be a surprise.

  25. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    California/Thailand
    Posts
    1,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Interesting, the interest in video in a mid to upper-range DSLR... I guess I'm really out of the loop. I would cheerfully forfeit any video feature and add $500 or more to get a camera with better design and engineering details for still photography. If I want VDO I'll buy a competent VDO camera. I really am at a loss to understand this direction. On an entry level/mid-consumer camera... okay, but on a $3,000 or higher still camera? Please, give me weather sealing, MLU, fantastic view finder, great AF (wider placement and more AF points, plus accuracy)... Yes, a 12 to 16 MP 1Ds3 without the ginormous form-factor and a few intelligent improvements still. Oh, and lighten up on the AA a bit, would ya? Charge $5,000 if you want, Canon, and quit worrying about cannibalizing 1Ds3 sales because other makers (read "Nikon") are doing the cannibalizing for you. Make it up in volume.

    Heehee. Sometimes I get a little ramped up. Sorry.

    Looking forward to the new releases.

  26. #76
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by rexyinc View Post
    Just spoke to one of the engineers ( his a mate and client of mine ) of the upcoming 3d & 7d's ( the 5d replacements ) he said they will look into adding HD video to the next generation.. ie: way too late now to add a major feature like this to the units pitty as I had a whole list of 'must haves' I wanted added to the video feature.. and the res is about 16mps. just relax for another two weeks okays.

    Tony
    So the two tier replacement is fact?
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  27. #77
    rexyinc
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    yes sir, a basic budget one and one we actually will want to use not sure if they both get released the same time, that's up to the marketing dept. The 3d will be a higher spec'd model. I won't say much more ok.. Just wait another two weeks

    BTW they monitor all these forums very closely.. and boy do they have a good laugh at some of the threads and comments haha.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    So the two tier replacement is fact?

  28. #78
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Just as we will laugh at them if the 5D mkII is about as revolutionary and badly priced as the 50D. Laugh all the way to the Nikon bank.
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  29. #79
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Assuming that the 5D replacement is 21MP and great at high ISO, there's one more thing Canon can do to make it a smash hit. Release a great 24-70/2.8 IS version for the same price or less than the non-stabilized Nikon version. I would buy the Nikon today, but I can't see paying $1700 for a non-stabilized, huge standard zoom.

  30. #80
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    Just as we will laugh at them if the 5D mkII is about as revolutionary and badly priced as the 50D. Laugh all the way to the Nikon bank.
    Sorry, but I must be missing your point, Ben. If you are not a Canon owner, and do not like what they offer, why bother with them? If you are a Canon user, there is a lot of possibly good news on the way, so what is the issue. The 50D is not such a bad camera or deal if you really look at what you are getting. Lots of folks seem to think this the case. The 5D has been a very venerable offering for quite a long time, and any upgrade will most likely be substantial, and probably offer quite a bit of interesting things.

    No point in bashing Canon in favor of Nikon on this forum, as folks are not of that nature here. We all have our preferences. Some of us are gear agnostic. Some of us have a lot invested in some systems and lines of gear, so there may be some cheering in one camp a bit more/less than another. If folks want to constantly be switching out gear for what they think is the latest and greatest, that is their choice. Personally, I like seeing the competition among manufacturers, as it does bring about better offerings for all of us, most of the time. In the end, if the gear does not meet your needs, do not bother buying it. Nice to have choices.

    LJ

  31. #81
    Senior Member Robert Campbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Norn Iron
    Posts
    1,098
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by rexyinc View Post

    BTW they monitor all these forums very closely..
    But, do they listen to what is said? Listen to the requests/demands/wishes for whatever? Like, who needs the print button on a 5D?
    Sláinte

    Robert.

  32. #82
    Senior Member helenhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,895
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Can CANON ever catch up to NIKON now ?
    hasn't the canon mystique been blown to smithereens w/ the D3, & D700

    Cheers - H

  33. #83
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,872
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Sure Canon can catch up to Nikon!

    1) If they manage to build a similar good AF system as in D3, D300, D700.

    2) If they really manage to build and manufacture their next gen CMOS sensors paired with DIGIC4 and DIGIC5 processing - should bring immense pixel density paired with lowest noise at high ISO, something we only can dream about today...

    3) If they bring finally some good wide angle zooms, like the 14-24 from Nikon

    4) If they manage to make their cameras as robust and weatherproof as Nikon, especially in the mid range

    In general I think Canon has much better cards for the future of digital, because they already develop their own sensors since many years. So their potential for groundbreaking improvements is there and I hope they will leverage that. One example would be here the possibility to skip AA filters totally, because they can do processing in their DIGIC5 engines. Plus DR, plus partial ISO, etc. Who else will be there in the next years? No other vendor I see.

  34. #84
    Deceased, but remembered fondly here... johnastovall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dublin, Texas, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,549
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    112

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    More than a ultra wide zoom, I want to see Canon come up with a fast prime wide at about 20 to fill the gap they now have there. New 14/2.8 is outstanding as it the over looked 24/1.4 but I would like a Canon replacement for my Zeiss 21/2.8 Distagon that used all the AF mount features.

    "The market wants a Leica to be a Leica: the inheritor of tradition, the subject of lore, and indisputably a mark of status to own."
    Mike Johnston


  35. #85
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Not sure if this will help on the wide end, but it looks like Zeiss may be supporting the EOS mount soon:

    http://theonlinephotographer.typepad...iss-zx-mo.html

    http://proimaging.blogspot.com/2008/...canon-eos.html

    Personally, I think Canon and Nikon will continue to avoid directly competing products except for at the 1D/D3 level where the D3 will compete with the 1D and D3x with the 1Ds. A $3,000 21MP 5D II with great image quality will compete well in this market even without a better AF system and weather sealing.

  36. #86
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by LJL View Post
    Sorry, but I must be missing your point, Ben. If you are not a Canon owner, and do not like what they offer, why bother with them? If you are a Canon user, there is a lot of possibly good news on the way, so what is the issue. The 50D is not such a bad camera or deal if you really look at what you are getting. Lots of folks seem to think this the case. The 5D has been a very venerable offering for quite a long time, and any upgrade will most likely be substantial, and probably offer quite a bit of interesting things.

    No point in bashing Canon in favor of Nikon on this forum, as folks are not of that nature here. We all have our preferences. Some of us are gear agnostic. Some of us have a lot invested in some systems and lines of gear, so there may be some cheering in one camp a bit more/less than another. If folks want to constantly be switching out gear for what they think is the latest and greatest, that is their choice. Personally, I like seeing the competition among manufacturers, as it does bring about better offerings for all of us, most of the time. In the end, if the gear does not meet your needs, do not bother buying it. Nice to have choices.

    LJ

    LJ, I've always shot canon, own a couple of 5D's. If the replacement is what most think it will be then I will seriously think about changing. My comment was based on the above mention of canon execs laughing at our discussions, if they are still as arrogant as we can assume they are then I will have no problem changing over for a better camera as I think will many people. I have absolutely no brand loyalty whatsoever, whoever provides the tool better suited to my purposes gets my money, period. Given that the founders here, especially Guy, are among the pioneers of this philosophy in todays digital world, I rather think that this is exactly the nature of the folks here. Personally I and many others here think that 'The 5D has been a very venerable offering for quite a long time, and any upgrade will most likely be substantial, and probably offer quite a bit of interesting things.
    '
    is rather optimistic and I will put my money where my mouth is. I can't see that any one could fault me for that.

    On an aside, and someone mentioned the 24-70L, I'm about to sell my third copy, all three have had significant focus shift (NOT focus innaccuracy) which is horribly apparent in fluorescent light. I've lost count of the times I've sent these lenses back to CPS. I've taken to shooting most everything that needs critical sharpness with primes and during a wedding that is a serious pain. I'm going to wait till after photokina then either swap to the Nikon camp completely, see if there is an interesting replacement for the lens or swop for a 24-105L.
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  37. #87
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Well Canon has had lens problems for a long time and years of bitching has really not totally solved it. No question they have some good lenses but they also have some very bad ones even in the L cabinet. I guess the scary part is one day I looked in my bag and had 8 leica R lenses to compensate for what canon did not have going on. That was the day I bought a DMR. But since those days until present they have improved but in my mind not enough. They want to sell 22 mpx camera's than they need the glass to support it. They have gotten better but the whole alternative lens thing started with a few folks and has grown quite large. Certainly a signal to canon there lenses are not preforming to folks tasks. My issue with them is they still have yet to fully fix the issue. Sure the have had replacements and such new 85mm , 16-35 and so on but today as they keep trying to market MPX to people as the marketing tool . They still are left short with lenses that won't handle the MPX race well . Sure there are a few and there long stuff is great but still no wide angle primes that really sing as well as the 35 1.4 or better. I think the interesting thing we are seeing is Nikon is really trying to up the ante and it does have some if not a lot very interested back in Nikon. Now the new 5d will come out and of course will be better but there still not addressing the lenses and the world of alternative glass will prosper again. I guess we wait once again for announcements on new product but the rumors for glass is still pretty null. Now there is talk of Zeiss joining the Canon line and such , so things hopefully are improving for the end user. But getting Leica R lenses and old Zeiss lenses to bolt on the new Canons will eventually dry up. So hopefully there is new life coming and Canon actually listened to there customer base.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  38. #88
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Saw this little teaser this morning

    http://www.canon.co.uk/
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  39. #89
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Saw this little teaser this morning

    http://www.canon.co.uk/
    Well, hard to tell too much from the teaser, but unless they have removed the top dial from the 5D, the camera in the teaser profiles more like a 1-series body. That could be the "evolution"....bringing the 5D more toward the 1-series, and everybody is speculating on what that means.

    LJ

  40. #90
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    I've been making a list of reasons not to stay with my present 5D's. What is comes down to is two things, Pro AF and weather sealing. These are the two only reasons that I would upgrade as a necessity. Shot two weddings in the rain this week and during one the lens wasn't communicating properly, I think a tiny bit of moisture got in. I shoot a lot in the rain and eventhough it's not for long periods I'm fed up of risking that kind of investment. The other point is that I want my cameras to focus f4 lenses as fast as it presently does f2.8, i.e. AF as fast as the 1 series. If neither of these things happen then I'll either stick with what I have and use primes more or see if a few niggling but important things about nikon are enough to stop me switching.
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  41. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    My comment was based on the above mention of canon execs laughing at our discussions, if they are still as arrogant as we can assume they are then I will have no problem changing over for a better camera as I think will many people.
    Ben,
    Your point was a bit lost in your post, hence my question about your response.

    With respect to changing over to another camera....that may be easy for some folks, especially if they do not mind losing a fair amount on selling their old gear and replacing with new. If you only have a few lenses and such, might not be an issue. But, as you mention, if you have shot Canon for some time, you may have a lot more tied up in glass, and that always costs to replace.

    In that regard, a lot also depends on what you shoot. I use a lot of longer glass for sports stuff, and from what I have seen, Canon still excels in the long glass. I also have an use the 24-70 f2.8 a lot. It is not a perfect lens, but it has not failed me yet shooting on a 1DsMkII at 16+MP. Could always be better, and there are alternatives, if you do not mind giving up AF and sometimes metering functions. Not something I can afford to give up with a lot of my subjects.

    I shot Nikon for 25 years, and have never lost my fondness for their stuff, but until very recently, they just could not deliver what I needed for my work. I am still looking hard at things like their D3 and D700, plus any D3x they may offer, but Canon still does a pretty decent job of delivering images. I do wish for improvements in the lens line-up as mentioned, but that always seems to be the case for both Nikon and Canon. If somebody like Zeiss does enter the picture making Canon compatible glass that is able to function with AF, for example, a lot of folks might be heading that way. Hard to believe Canon would not react to that also.

    In the end, both Canon and Nikon are turning out decent gear. It may not excel in every aspect, but they do tend to cover a lot more ground as systems. The 5D replacement will probably NOT be a dud. I really do have no way of knowing that until it is out and in the hands of folks, but the original 5D held its own for nearly three years before Nikon put something similar into the market. I have to look at the entire line-up of offerings before I start jumping from one system to another, not just one camera. Presently Nikon is impressing a lot of folks, but not everywhere in their lens line-up either, both for IQ and price. Nether of these guys have it all worked out yet, so what is the harm in waiting a few more weeks to see what else comes to market?

    LJ

  42. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    I've been making a list of reasons not to stay with my present 5D's. What is comes down to is two things, Pro AF and weather sealing. These are the two only reasons that I would upgrade as a necessity. Shot two weddings in the rain this week and during one the lens wasn't communicating properly, I think a tiny bit of moisture got in. I shoot a lot in the rain and eventhough it's not for long periods I'm fed up of risking that kind of investment. The other point is that I want my cameras to focus f4 lenses as fast as it presently does f2.8, i.e. AF as fast as the 1 series. If neither of these things happen then I'll either stick with what I have and use primes more or see if a few niggling but important things about nikon are enough to stop me switching.
    Totally understand about the needs for weather sealing. I wind up in very harsh conditions a lot, and that is why I did not even think about anything other than my 1-series bodies and "L" lenses for my shooting needs. The new 50D from Canon is starting to get some more seals, but the 5D just missed that mark, and in speed for me to ever consider it. Hoping whatever comes along next has some of these rather important things in place and that it is more of "pro level" camera that can take the harder use some of us may give the gear, such as shooting in the rain and dust a lot.

    LJ

  43. #93
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    I've been making a list of reasons not to stay with my present 5D's. What is comes down to is two things, Pro AF and weather sealing.
    I agree for sure on those two, but for me woudl add frame-rate and higher ISO noise. If I got all of that in a new 5D and it was still 11MP, I would be happy to stay with Canon...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  44. #94
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I agree for sure on those two, but for me woudl add frame-rate and higher ISO noise. If I got all of that in a new 5D and it was still 11MP, I would be happy to stay with Canon...
    Jack,
    So you want more noise at higher ISOs ??? (just kidding....we know what you meant, and I agree with your adds to Ben's wishes....weather seals, faster frame rates, higher NOISE FREE ISO, and much faster and accurate AF.)

    LJ

  45. #95
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I agree for sure on those two, but for me woudl add frame-rate and higher ISO noise. If I got all of that in a new 5D and it was still 11MP, I would be happy to stay with Canon...
    The latest rumors seem pretty reliable and state 21MP, 4 FPS, new (presumably weaker) AA filter, and body otherwise similar to 50D (no heavy duty weather sealing and "non-pro" AF). Also said to offer 1 stop better high ISO performance than the 50D and no video.

  46. #96
    rexyinc
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    oh your kidding me right? you want VR and will actually use it? on this range? common please..

    Quote Originally Posted by asabet View Post
    Assuming that the 5D replacement is 21MP and great at high ISO, there's one more thing Canon can do to make it a smash hit. Release a great 24-70/2.8 IS version for the same price or less than the non-stabilized Nikon version. I would buy the Nikon today, but I can't see paying $1700 for a non-stabilized, huge standard zoom.

  47. #97
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,872
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by rexyinc View Post
    oh your kidding me right? you want VR and will actually use it? on this range? common please..
    Owning the 24-70 from Nikon and using it on a D3 I must say I of course would love VR on this lens!

    Are you kidding here????

  48. #98
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Owning the 24-70 from Nikon and using it on a D3 I must say I of course would love VR on this lens!

    Are you kidding here????
    No - I agree.
    Anders Uschold in BJP makes it pretty clear that putting IS into lenses DOES sacrifice quality. With the fantastic high ISO on the D3/D700, I don't think it would be worth sacrificing any of the quality for the sake of IS, which would be of questionable value - if you need more shutter speed, just stick up the ISO.

    I like IS . .. but it won't be REALLY useful until it manages to stop subject movement as well as camera movement

    Just this guy you know

  49. #99
    asabet
    Guest

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    No - I agree.
    Anders Uschold in BJP makes it pretty clear that putting IS into lenses DOES sacrifice quality.
    I'm not all that famililar with Nikon lenses yet. However, on the Canon side, the IS versions of lenses have shown improved image quality over the non IS versions in most cases, most likely because the IS designs are newer designs. The only Canon lens I've heard of where the IS version is thought to be a little bit less sharp is the 300/4. Not the 70-200/2.8, 70-200/4 (IS much sharper), 18-55 (IS much sharper), 75-300 (old lens), 300/2.8, 400/2.8, 500/4, or 600/4. In each of those cases, the IS version is widely considered on par with or better than the non-IS version. Even flare performance, which might be expected to suffer with the greater number of elements, has not been demonstrably worse in any of those examples that I have seen.

    As pixels bet smaller, it takes less handshake to sacrifice a bit of quality at the pixel level. To make the most of 21 megapixels on a 24x36mm sensor, handshake has to be neutralized, even on the wide side. So yes, I'd like stabilization even with a wide lens. On a lens that ventures into short tele as the 24-70 does, its a clear benefit for the way I shoot.

    With a non-IS lens, I can handhold a sharp photo of a static subject at 70mm and 1/100s perhaps 90% of the time. The shot I need may be in the other 10%, and I can get it with an IS lens.
    Last edited by asabet; 6th September 2008 at 06:29.

  50. #100
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The 5D replacement rumor mill...

    I have IS on several Canon lenses, and frankly, it does not get used all that much. Might just be the subjects I am shooting that does not have me using it much. For me it tends to slow down the entire AF process, but then I am mainly pointing at things that are moving around and sometimes rather fast. I have even gone to the point of taping over the controls with IS off on my 70-200 f2.8L IS lens, mainly so I do not accidently engage it.

    In agreement with Amin, I have not found any degradation of images from IS versus non-IS lenses that I have used. There may be a few cases where folks are seeing things, but I think them few and far between.

    While IS is a very nice feature to have, it is not needed or useful in a lot of shooting situations, especially anything where the subject is moving. In those cases, a higher shutter speed is the preferred choice. I can see that it may have some utility on a lens like the 24-70 for more static subjects (group shots, and things like that), and I would probably use it for many of the failing light, post-match sports awards I shoot, but right now, I am augmenting those with fill flash, so it may no matter as much. It does seem to do a very good job at lower shutter speeds, handheld, and where the subject is not moving, but I tend to kick the ISO up a stop, if needed, and that gets me there most of the times. (There are times when the ISO is already high, and then the IS really does help gain a bit more steadiness.)

    On balance, the Canon IS does seem to work quite well on their lenses. It does add a significant cost to the lens, and some weight, but if needed, it does the job well. I do not see it degrading the resolving capabilities or introducing any other problems on glass that I have shot. I just do not think it needs to be on all lenses, or used all the time, but it does the job when needed.

    LJ

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •