I've been trying out the EOS R with a RF 50mm 1.2 after selling my Nikon Z7. I like the build quality a lot, but it also has quite the heft when mounted to an RF lens. Switching gear induces a learning curve for which the Canon's 600 plus page manual has impressed upon me. But, it's the L lenses I'm after with their 1.2 offerings in the RF and EF mount. It's more about the lenses character than absolute resolution and Canon does that for me. I drew the line when pixel peeping at 200% and deciding what I thought was sharp! Don't be that photographer! However, the Canon RP is not so dramatically different in specs, that I'm wondering if I should get it and wait for the R5, which is my initial plan with the EOS R. But the EOS RP is now selling for under $1000! One consideration is the RP's slower top shutter speed of 1/4000th over the EOS R's 1/8000th, and having 1.2 lenses, this could be an issue. But I could easily use an ND to offset that too (yeah, remember those?) I shoot mostly portraits and don't need blazing FPS, but maybe the RP could suffice until the R5 and save $ for another RF/EF lens or two.