Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 42 of 42

Thread: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like

    Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Hi everyone,

    I m thinking about selling my Olympus OMD and its lenses to get on the fuji bandwagon, the IQ on the Fuji seems really stellar but I could also go on and find loads of OMD stunning pictures.

    What intrigues me is the way fuji pix seems more natural and "organic" than the OMDs which might look more "plastic" ... it's very strange I don't have the words really to describe it.

    What do you think is the main difference in the rendering of both fuji and omd ?

    Thanks a lot for your thoughts on this.
    Selling OMD and Pana 14mm and Navitar 75mm

  2. #2
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    I have both and both have their great sides and their downsides.

    IQ is in most cases better from Fuji, but I still hate AF (despite all FW upgrades) - I am shooting the XP1. I am missing so many shots just because of this (I am using the Fuji for a lot of moving subjects and Fuji simply is not where they should be.

    So be careful with selling OMD, you might regret - it is not all about stunning IQ.

    Also end of the day I find the Fuji RAW IQ still a big hype and there are lot of other cameras without AA filter, which are as good or even better (D800E, K5IIs, etc....)
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Thanks for this ptomsu,

    I agree with you when you say it's not all about IQ and indeed the OMD is almost everything I could hope for in terms of functionnality, lens choice etc ..

    I just think I'm missing something, maybe I just need to get a hold of a fuji for some time and decide after more testing.
    Selling OMD and Pana 14mm and Navitar 75mm

  4. #4
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcamel View Post
    I just think I'm missing something, maybe I just need to get a hold of a fuji for some time and decide after more testing.
    I would do this!

    You will always find cameras which are better in certain aspects / areas.

    C/N for really pro fast AF (with the right models)
    Leica for stunning IQ under certain conditions (not too high ISO)
    Fuji as a good allrounder with great IQ and AF like RF
    OMD and EP5 for a lightweight and in general overall high quality
    Pentax (K5IIs) for stunning IQ and great high ISO with meanwhile a decent AF

    etc. etc.

    SO testing (maybe renting) the Fuji for a few days might be the best to find out if you miss something.

    Ant then either buy or forget
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    72
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    what I like about the Fuji is the colour rendition and quality of the images. What I like about the OMD is the size and the lens line-up. Quite frankly, neither of them are as good as Dslrs in focusing in my opinion.

  6. #6
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    I would concur regarding the trade offs regarding the Fuji IQ and AF. Despite what Fuji say, AF isn't great and I've also been in travel situations where it simply couldn't lock in time. I'm sure others have found this in family shooting situations with kids etc.

    Picture quality is great but the AF is merely adequate and best for semi-static subjects IMHO.
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    If you want stellar IQ, ad a Sigma DP Merrill to the OMD and continue to enjoy the things the OMD is really good at. The Fuji is not ready for primetime yet imho. Its wanna be rangefinder gestalt is intriguing, but neither the IQ (raw files) nor user interface is what they could and should be. AF gets into the way too often, shutter lag is annoying, MF implementation mediocre, ZF a pain (compared to a Leica M) and the IQ simply overhyped. My post is not to bash the camera, I have the XE-1 with the 18, 35, 60 mm primes and the 18-55m zoom and the XPro-1 in the closet (should sell it since months). The OMD excels at a few things and might even set some standards there, including AF, IS, versatility. The Fuji too desperately tries to be the better Leica rather than at beating competition in one or the other area.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    I have both and both have their great sides and their downsides.

    IQ is in most cases better from Fuji, but I still hate AF (despite all FW upgrades) - I am shooting the XP1. I am missing so many shots just because of this (I am using the Fuji for a lot of moving subjects and Fuji simply is not where they should be.

    So be careful with selling OMD, you might regret - it is not all about stunning IQ.

    Also end of the day I find the Fuji RAW IQ still a big hype and there are lot of other cameras without AA filter, which are as good or even better (D800E, K5IIs, etc....)
    Fully agree on the IQ. And in the end, no matter how good the IQ, if the camera gets into the way to capture QI (quality images) it`s really annoying.

  9. #9
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Houston TX USA
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Debating right now if I should put the X-Pro + 3 lens kit up on the for sale board.

    In the studio it does a stellar job. Have not shot in the studio for almost a year, and the day job means that will continue ....

    OM-D worked out great for swim season, and that is what I will most likely be shooting in the next year. If the studio time does pop, the OM-D is not bad, just not a good as the X-Pro, which is not in the same league as the P03+ was ....

    Oh the choices ....

    Dave

  10. #10
    Subscriber Member Chuck Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Studio City, CA
    Posts
    700
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Well, as Dave says above the Fuji isn't a P30+ but it does fit in my jacket pocket. For the cost difference between my X-E1 and a P30+ on a decent body you can buy twenty of them with tripods and electronic trigger to stick around the set to really give you some choices for the final "keepers" and still have an overall IQ that is close.

    Autofocus? The Fuji is a DOG. Period. Not much more to say about it. For most work, forget about it. The good news is manual focus is pretty easy with a Fuji. Besides, sharp is way over rated in my opinion.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by retow View Post
    If you want stellar IQ, ad a Sigma DP Merrill to the OMD and continue to enjoy the things the OMD is really good at.
    It's that good ? which one btw DP1-2-3 ?
    Selling OMD and Pana 14mm and Navitar 75mm

  12. #12
    Subscriber Member Chuck Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Studio City, CA
    Posts
    700
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcamel View Post
    It's that good ? which one btw DP1-2-3 ?
    Everything you love about the OMD your going to hate about the Merrill. Same chip I believe in all three of them the difference being the lens focal length.

    Think of the Merrill as a jacket pocket version of a Large Format 8x10 in workflow & pain-in-the-*** to use, and you just about have it. Right down to the worthless to use part in low light, and the need for an overkill sized tripod.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcamel View Post
    It's that good ? which one btw DP1-2-3 ?
    I suggest to read the threads to these cameras with lots of pics and feedback from real users. All three of the DP Merrills share the same sensor, body and user interface so it comes mainly down to preferred focal length.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcamel View Post
    Hi everyone,

    I m thinking about selling my Olympus OMD and its lenses to get on the fuji bandwagon, the IQ on the Fuji seems really stellar but I could also go on and find loads of OMD stunning pictures.

    What intrigues me is the way fuji pix seems more natural and "organic" than the OMDs which might look more "plastic" ... it's very strange I don't have the words really to describe it.

    What do you think is the main difference in the rendering of both fuji and omd ?

    Thanks a lot for your thoughts on this.
    To me the IQ of the Fuji is definitively better, but that's more noticeable in my case because I often work with available light and higher ISO's. I do like the "bite" AAless xtrans can give you but you really need to use a premium raw converter that understands Xtrans well (Capture One, and Iridient now for plain detail though not so hot on the color side).

    That aside, you can certainly take stunning photographs with both. Don't switch to the Fuji thinking your photos will be any better- they will be as good as the photographer you are.

    My #1 reason for not liking the OMD was ergonomics. Really hate them. To my surprise Mike from theOnlinePhotographer sold his after his initial love for the same reasons apparently.

    - Ricardo

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    I have both and both have their great sides and their downsides.

    IQ is in most cases better from Fuji, but I still hate AF (despite all FW upgrades)
    Check the very latest firmware upgrade. Though it may not be the improvement you are satisfied with, there's a notable improvement.

    - Ricardo

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    @Lord- I suggest you check out some working photographer's work for an assessment of the Fuji image quality. It's the photographer but check out the tonality, color and sharp. I have to say I disagree somewhat strongly with the IQ assessment made above and the "useless ness of the AF" - sorry but I don't think the AF is *that bad*.

    In fact with the latest firmware the gap has closed between Olympus and Fuji on this one. The Olympus is still faster, but I have seen the Olympus being close to the Fuji with other lenses that are not the OMD-5 telephoto kit lens (that one is really fast, but other lenses are not as fast as that one).

    Simple test if you wonder- Have an OMD-5 shoot at its lowest ISO on a shot with sky. Preferably twilight type light but even daylight can work. Look at the same shot on the Fuji. Note the noise.

    - Ricardo

    PS: That all said, I can't stress enough that you should not just go to the Fuji because the IQ is better. I would do it for the ergonomics and IQ together (the reason I did). But if you say you are happy with the OMD, just keep using your OMD and focus on photography. It will be better for you.

  17. #17
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by raist3d View Post
    Check the very latest firmware upgrade. Though it may not be the improvement you are satisfied with, there's a notable improvement.

    - Ricardo
    Ricardo,

    after the FW update today I am positively surprised at least with the XP1 and the 1.4/35. If this holds up also for the other lenses, then I would say that the AF difference between Fuji and OMD became minimal if noticeable anyway.

    Also the OMD has some quirks with AF like the AF field size permanent change which does not work till today IMHO - at least I gave up to try. So I would say that AF is not fully perfect on both sides but became workable now also in most situations.

    Peter

    PS:
    BTW a bit off topic - since yesterday I am lucky owner of a K5IIs and a 18-135 - man what a great camera and pretty good lens. Just love the images (DNG) and could really not say which ones are better IQ - Fuji or K5IIs. What is now pretty perfect as well is the new AF compared to the original K5.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Ricardo,

    after the FW update today I am positively surprised at least with the XP1 and the 1.4/35. If this holds up also for the other lenses, then I would say that the AF difference between Fuji and OMD became minimal if noticeable anyway.
    I expect notable improvements with all the primes. The kit zoom improved, but not as much from where it was, since it was faster to begin with. The big win really is % of locks vs non locks. And accuracy. When it lock, it locks (though accuracy per se before was still pretty good).

    Also the OMD has some quirks with AF like the AF field size permanent change which does not work till today IMHO - at least I gave up to try. So I would say that AF is not fully perfect on both sides but became workable now also in most situations.
    I will still give the nod to the Olympus in speed. It's just that the Fuji has become quite acceptable for many situations imho. I did some street life just last night to prove whether it was a notable difference (XF35 1.4) and it was.

    Also the OMD focus lock is not always accurate. That was pointed out by a friend that had the EM-5 and has the FUji now, and myself, when I tried it. But to be fair the situation where it failed to lock I put it in was not easy.


    Peter

    PS:
    BTW a bit off topic - since yesterday I am lucky owner of a K5IIs and a 18-135 - man what a great camera and pretty good lens. Just love the images (DNG) and could really not say which ones are better IQ - Fuji or K5IIs. What is now pretty perfect as well is the new AF compared to the original K5.
    I think the Fuji is pretty good but more because of the lens. But the K5IIs to me will have the best IQ overall. The K5IIS has 14 bit RAW files (so better tonality unless you have the X100s which also has 14 bit raws), and the DR is still the best of APS_C. The Fuji has the advantage of being more resistant to the color moire, but to me the Pentax K-5 line is the best DSLR I have seen, and if you want a DSLR that's it.

    I would like if Pentax did new K-mount ASPC primes that were faster. There's some selection but would be nice to have a 40-54 equivalent at F1.4/F1.2. That combined with the super high ISO capability of a K-5 would be quite a tour de force.

    The only reason I am going to most likely sell my K-5 is simply that I am not carrying it (as small as it is for a DSLR). I really think it's the best DSLR I have ever had. I will still recommend it highly for anyone looking for a DSLR.

    - Ricardo

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Hi guys, thanks for all the answers, finally I am selling the OMD + 14 + 25 + 75 navitar and trying to find the X-M1 at a decent price
    Selling OMD and Pana 14mm and Navitar 75mm

  20. #20
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Houston TX USA
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    well, just shot in the studio again, still have the Fuji, and loved it! The OM-D did not even make the trip.

    Will post some images on this forum over the weekend .....

  21. #21
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    After several months of shooting Fuji X Pro 1 I finally sold this system. Simply because speed and AF accuracy is not up to what I am looking for. So I cannot use it for my purposes.

    Instead the OMD performs solid and good. Looking forward to the new EM1, as it should top the OMD in IQ and speed and accuracy.

    Plus the form factor of the m43 lenses is just so much more appealing than the Fuji X lenses.

    This decision has NOTHING to do with IQ from either camera, as I found both great!
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    90
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    I love my K5, too. I have owned quite a range of SLRs over the years (E10, D100, 14n, 340D, 450D, 5D, D50, SD9, SD14, S5pro) and while they all have likeable attributes, for me the K5 seems to incorporate everything in one camera. Difficult to see myself changing it, it's all I want in a SLR.

    But, compact as it is, it's still a bulky SLR and I'm mainly using mirrorless these days. XE1 due to arrive shortly.

    Been thinking about one since they launched but have read so many complaints and negative comments that coupled with the relatively high price had put me off. To my surprise, last thursday I found a new camera shop had just opened near me and they had an XE1 available for playing with. I knew I was going to get one withing seconds of picking it up. Like the K5, it just felt right, almost molded to my hand in a way that various Panys and NEX fail to do. I think it's because the K5 and XE1 share the feeling of being cameras rather than electronic gizmos. Most digitals have lost that feeling, IMO.

    Quote Originally Posted by raist3d View Post
    I expect notable improvements with all the primes. The kit zoom improved, but not as much from where it was, since it was faster to begin with. The big win really is % of locks vs non locks. And accuracy. When it lock, it locks (though accuracy per se before was still pretty good).



    I will still give the nod to the Olympus in speed. It's just that the Fuji has become quite acceptable for many situations imho. I did some street life just last night to prove whether it was a notable difference (XF35 1.4) and it was.

    Also the OMD focus lock is not always accurate. That was pointed out by a friend that had the EM-5 and has the FUji now, and myself, when I tried it. But to be fair the situation where it failed to lock I put it in was not easy.



    I think the Fuji is pretty good but more because of the lens. But the K5IIs to me will have the best IQ overall. The K5IIS has 14 bit RAW files (so better tonality unless you have the X100s which also has 14 bit raws), and the DR is still the best of APS_C. The Fuji has the advantage of being more resistant to the color moire, but to me the Pentax K-5 line is the best DSLR I have seen, and if you want a DSLR that's it.

    I would like if Pentax did new K-mount ASPC primes that were faster. There's some selection but would be nice to have a 40-54 equivalent at F1.4/F1.2. That combined with the super high ISO capability of a K-5 would be quite a tour de force.

    The only reason I am going to most likely sell my K-5 is simply that I am not carrying it (as small as it is for a DSLR). I really think it's the best DSLR I have ever had. I will still recommend it highly for anyone looking for a DSLR.

    - Ricardo

  23. #23
    Subscriber Member Chuck Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Studio City, CA
    Posts
    700
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by davemillier View Post
    I love my K5, too. I have owned quite a range of SLRs over the years (E10, D100, 14n, 340D, 450D, 5D, D50, SD9, SD14, S5pro) and while they all have likeable attributes, for me the K5 seems to incorporate everything in one camera. Difficult to see myself changing it, it's all I want in a SLR.

    But, compact as it is, it's still a bulky SLR and I'm mainly using mirrorless these days. XE1 due to arrive shortly.

    Been thinking about one since they launched but have read so many complaints and negative comments that coupled with the relatively high price had put me off. To my surprise, last thursday I found a new camera shop had just opened near me and they had an XE1 available for playing with. I knew I was going to get one withing seconds of picking it up. Like the K5, it just felt right, almost molded to my hand in a way that various Panys and NEX fail to do. I think it's because the K5 and XE1 share the feeling of being cameras rather than electronic gizmos. Most digitals have lost that feeling, IMO.
    For the record, though I continue to use it occasionally (last night in fact) I still feel the autofocus speed on the Fuji X-E1 is its worst feature. Followed very closely by video capability in the race to the bottom of the feature heap.

    I'm speculating Fuji product management may have gotten caught up drinking their own "rangefinder like experience" kool-aid. Fooling themselves into believing our world would shun autofocus in favor of "retro" manual focus. Most of us who bought in haven't. Many who bought in have now sold out and moved on to greener pastures that can at least land a decent kid shot. The market is more competitive today than at any point in history I can remember. There are a lot of very good cameras to choose from.

    Even with the firmware updates that have helped many, they haven't pulled my X-E1 up much past the "autofocus sucks" point for my uses. I still rank it abysmal for documenting low light live events. Any camera that takes over a second to "land and lock" in today's day and age is positively embarrassing. Judging by the recent price drops, Fuji must agree. Is Fuji clearing out inventory to make room for the X-E2 & XPro-2? One/both almost certain to make an appearance here shortly is my prediction.

    I have very high hopes for what the next generation top of the Fuji lineup will have to offer. Fuji aren't dummies, they read the tea leaves right along with the rest. Looks like they nailed the autofocus with the X100s, from all reports. Nail that gapping hole closed with the XPro-2, and I am likely to stay in the fold. So are many other people. The Fuji lenses are all excellent, and reasonably priced as top quality autofocus glass goes today. Of course, having the option to use my "aged" Leica & Zeiss glass collection is a must, but there I do not mind being limited to only manual focus.

    Now that the new Leica M 240 is starting to slowly ship, the price for a used M8 has fallen again. Nearly to the range of a new Fuji body. I would be a liar if I didn't admit to being tempted. But I sure would miss the dynamic range and high ISO capability of the X-E1.

  24. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    142
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Jones View Post
    ...

    Now that the new Leica M 240 is starting to slowly ship, the price for a used M8 has fallen again. Nearly to the range of a new Fuji body. I would be a liar if I didn't admit to being tempted. But I sure would miss the dynamic range and high ISO capability of the X-E1.
    Hi,

    could you please describe in which area the Leica M8 is better in IQ than the XPro or XE1?

  25. #25
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by 4711 View Post
    Hi,

    could you please describe in which area the Leica M8 is better in IQ than the XPro or XE1?
    Having shot a M8 for years and a XPro1 for the last 8 months, I only can assure that IQ wise at least below ISO 800 I clearly preferred the M8.

    Actually I bought the XPro1 because of all the hype on the Internet about the Fuji IQ and AF. IQ wise I answered already earlier. And the AF is AF, but in comparison to several other AF's on the market it is pretty useless, especially when photographing kids - I cannot remember about such a high miss rate of images because of AF with any other camera.

    Finally, while a number of folks praise Fuji for their continuous FW updates, this is just showing rather the weakness of the complete system, as all the updates IMHO did not really improve the overall camera behavior, especially AF accuracy in low light and speed.

    For me problem solved and X system sold ....
    Life is an ever changing journey
    http://photography.tomsu.eu/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_...tography/sets/
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  26. #26
    Subscriber Member Chuck Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Studio City, CA
    Posts
    700
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by 4711 View Post
    Hi,

    could you please describe in which area the Leica M8 is better in IQ than the XPro or XE1?
    Strictly limiting the judgement criteria to scientific measurement, all of the Fuji X-Trans CMOS sensor equipped cameras are probably better when you look at any of the numbers. X-Trans sensor technology is several years more advanced than the Kodak KAF-10500 CCD they designed into the M8 back in 2004/2005. In digital electronics terms, five years is lightyears when it comes to R&D advancements.

    My temptation has more to do with artistic look and camera feel. I've used a Leica M since film days, so nothing feels as good in my hand as an M. Leica M's are simple, silent, stealthy, superbly crafted and spectacular at getting out of my way so I can focus on my subject, not my camera's settings. I miss that basic simplicity when I shoot anything else.

    The M8 doesn't speak low light ambient though, where my X-E1 is fluent up to ISO 3200 and still strong even at 6400 with some noise reduction in post processing. The significant five or possibly six stop X-E1 advantage is huge.

    Curious to test a thought of picking up an M8 to use purely as a B&W only still camera, I did a quick test two nights ago with my X-E1 that proved once and for all going back to an ISO limit of 1600 isn't going to work for me. I've got to have enough good quality ISO to hold 1/50th second or better. I also want a body with good video, so the M8 sadly is not a contender for my bag anymore.
    TheCameraForum.Com
    ChuckJonesPhotography.Com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #27
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Jones View Post
    My temptation has more to do with artistic look and camera feel. I've used a Leica M since film days, so nothing feels as good in my hand as an M. Leica M's are simple, silent, stealthy, superbly crafted and spectacular at getting out of my way so I can focus on my subject, not my camera's settings. I miss that basic simplicity when I shoot anything else.
    Exactly my point!

    I wanted to get the same out of the XPro1 WRT simple, stealthy etc, plus have the advantages of a much more advanced sensor design.

    Bad luck, this did absolutely not work out from the simplicity and stealth perspective. And even worse AF just could not hold up as well.

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Neither AF nor MF/ZF are up to the standard they should be. And on top of it come a very noticeable shutter lag and a way to slow EVF refresh rate (lag and freeze of what seems to be an eternity). I will sell the two Fuji bodies and all prime lenses I have and keep the zoom for the time being. Maybe the next generation of a X-Pro will not be at beta stage when released.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #29
    Subscriber Member Chuck Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Studio City, CA
    Posts
    700
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Well, selling the body while there is still some value in it may be a wise move, but now that they have dropped the new price to clear old stock it is probably not going to bring what it should.

    But for now I am going to be keeping the lenses. I have a hunch that the X-E2 is probably going to raise the bar in even more ways. Heck, maybe they can even manage a little better video? I have a hard time deciding which sucks less, video from an X-Tran Fuji body or video from the new Leica M. They are both so equally bad, it is hard to get past the rolling shutter problems to even judge something like color!
    TheCameraForum.Com
    ChuckJonesPhotography.Com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  30. #30
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Houston TX USA
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    just took the X-Pro out and 55-200 out to the paint pall field. I have shot the OM-D in this setting quite a bit with the 14-140, and must say, I forgot how much subject isolation does change an image .....

    In round numbers, the Panasonic 2.8 zooms are needed to get the same "feel" as the 55-200.

    Yeah, the focusing was was slower, but with a bit of work, I did get a nice set of images. Will post later.

    Dave

  31. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lake Oswego, OR
    Posts
    38
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    So much depends on one's photographic style. I sold my OMD and kept my X E-1 with a bunch of lenses. Even the zoom has astounding IQ. I tend to shoot lots of static subjects in nature, not sports or small fast moving children. The AF issues can be a pain, especially with the 60 f/2.4, but the other primes focus reasonably well. I'm really looking forward to the 23 f/1.4 and the 56 f/1.2. With those, the 14, and 35, one has most of what one needs, speed, versatility, handling. I still cannot decide on the 55-200, it seems so big, but then again, it's a 300mm equivalent and we all know how large that is on a full frame DSLR camera.

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Having shot a M8 for years and a XPro1 for the last 8

    Finally, while a number of folks praise Fuji for their continuous FW updates, this is just showing rather the weakness of the complete system, as all the updates IMHO did not really improve the overall camera behavior, especially AF accuracy in low light and speed.
    I am not going to dispute the slower AF assessment but I am going to completely dispute this factually baseless claim. The firmware updates made a *night and day* difference in the operation of the Xpro 1. It made the manual focus from useless to usable, the AF from utterly slow to reasonably good (not good for your needs doesn't mean it s*cks now). AF accuracy in low light improved quite a bit (I do a lot of street night photography after all- in fact it's what I do the most).

    And you can't dispute that adding focus peaking to a 2 years old model while someone like Olympus forces you to buy a new model can't be a blessing for firmware upgrades. Every single reviewer has praised Fuji in this area. This is pretty factual- whether the improvement was enough for your needs it's another matter of course.

    - Ricardo
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  33. #33
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by raist3d View Post
    I am not going to dispute the slower AF assessment but I am going to completely dispute this factually baseless claim. The firmware updates made a *night and day* difference in the operation of the Xpro 1. It made the manual focus from useless to usable, the AF from utterly slow to reasonably good (not good for your needs doesn't mean it s*cks now). AF accuracy in low light improved quite a bit (I do a lot of street night photography after all- in fact it's what I do the most).

    And you can't dispute that adding focus peaking to a 2 years old model while someone like Olympus forces you to buy a new model can't be a blessing for firmware upgrades. Every single reviewer has praised Fuji in this area. This is pretty factual- whether the improvement was enough for your needs it's another matter of course.

    - Ricardo
    Well Ricardo,

    finally the improvements were not enough for me. And thus I stepped out of Fuji.

    But I always said that Fuji X is a great camera system, just depends on the needs of the person using it.

    Peter

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,115
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Well Ricardo,

    finally the improvements were not enough for me. And thus I stepped out of Fuji.

    But I always said that Fuji X is a great camera system, just depends on the needs of the person using it.

    Peter
    And I want to be clear- that is completely understandable. I am not disputing that in the end it wasn't a match for you even with the upgrades. What I dispute is that you expressed they (firmware) were effectively virtually useless, and that's just not true.

    I can tell you right now I was getting sometimes some misses in situations that now the camera just locks (XF35 F1.4) and the ability to lock focus in lower light improved quite a bit. It's hard to see that as useless :-)

    - Ricardo

  35. #35
    Senior Member David Schneider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Choice of a camera depends on your subject matter. For things that require fast focusing, like any kind of action, the Fuji XE1/XPro1 are not going to give you good results. For things that are not moving, in test I've done, particularly in-studio under controlled conditions, the Fuji equaled or exceeded my Canon 5dmk2 and several L lenses. While even still subjects don't focus as fast as the Canon, the rate of perfectly focused images was higher.

    I haven't tested the Fuji against the OMD.

    It's a pleasure to have a small form camera and lenses that produce quality files without the weight or cost of the latest dslr's.

    But my dslr doesn't replace my medium format digital and my XE1 doesn't replace my dslr either for every kind of situation there is. The right tool for the right job.

    That is tempered with age and experience though. Being older, having to carry a camera around for hours when on a trip, having the experience to understand the quirks and limitations of your gear does temper which system you use.

  36. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by retow View Post
    The Fuji too desperately tries to be the better Leica rather than at beating competition in one or the other area.
    Hmmm, I don't know about this. A combo EVF/OVF doesn't beat the competition? Fuji's lenses don't beat the competition? Fuji's ergonomics and dedicated shutter speed dial / aperture rings don't beat the competition? OR were you only talking about specs on paper?

  37. #37
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by raist3d View Post
    And I want to be clear- that is completely understandable. I am not disputing that in the end it wasn't a match for you even with the upgrades. What I dispute is that you expressed they (firmware) were effectively virtually useless, and that's just not true.

    I can tell you right now I was getting sometimes some misses in situations that now the camera just locks (XF35 F1.4) and the ability to lock focus in lower light improved quite a bit. It's hard to see that as useless :-)

    - Ricardo
    Absolutely agree. And one also needs to take into account that a Fuji with however AF, at least has AF and so it brings already a big advantage over a "just" manual focusable Leica M.

    If I would not do a major number of images from my fast moving 2 year old daughter, I would have been quite happy with the AF speed of the XPro1. For any slow moving subject, even in low light, I had no problem with the Fuji AF. And so I would have stayed with the Fuji.

  38. #38
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Well . . . . . I think that all these cameras (X, OMD, Leica, whatever your poison) produce fantastic images.

    So that deciding on a camera these days on image quality is really odd - the image quality is always fine.

    So you should decide on the camera that suits your style best; which offers you the options you need. more to the point, the camera that floats your boat and makes you happy to take photographs

    Just this guy you know
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  39. #39
    Senior Member JMaher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sarasota
    Posts
    942
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    So you should decide on the camera that suits your style best; which offers you the options you need. more to the point, the camera that floats your boat and makes you happy to take photographs
    I don't think this could be said any better. I have owned two versions of the recent Fuji's a 4/3 and a few m4/3's and more recently the OM-D. All took great pictures but have good points and negatives FOR ME. Currently I own a Canon 5D3 and a Canon M. The 5D3 takes beautiful pictures and meet my needs for radio controlled ETTL flash as well as depth of field control for portraiture. However I love the weight and size of the m4/3 options and find myself drawn to the E-M1. I am trying to hold out

    Jim
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  40. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by JSRockit View Post
    Hmmm, I don't know about this. A combo EVF/OVF doesn't beat the competition? Fuji's lenses don't beat the competition? Fuji's ergonomics and dedicated shutter speed dial / aperture rings don't beat the competition? OR were you only talking about specs on paper?
    Based on specs, the Fuji is a winner. That you list specs only is telling enough. Go figure based on what facts my statement was made.

  41. #41
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by JSRockit View Post
    Hmmm, I don't know about this. A combo EVF/OVF doesn't beat the competition? Fuji's lenses don't beat the competition? Fuji's ergonomics and dedicated shutter speed dial / aperture rings don't beat the competition? OR were you only talking about specs on paper?
    Ha, ha, ha,....

    The combo EVF/OVF of the XPro1 is just not up to the level of other EVFs and in NO CASE up to the level of Leica OVF!

    Fuji lenses are not better than other lenses from Olympus, Panasonic etc....

    Ergonomics - there is actually NO REAL new invention, dedicated shutter speed dials and aperture rings are around since decades and only miss in some lower end cameras today.

    So what's the point about all that "Fuji is better" or "Fuji is the new Leica" etc. etc ...

    While Fuji is not a bad camera, it definitely does not beat the competition by any means - no longer!

  42. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    501
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Fuji X trans IQ and Olympus OMD IQ

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    Well . . . . . I think that all these cameras (X, OMD, Leica, whatever your poison) produce fantastic images.

    So that deciding on a camera these days on image quality is really odd - the image quality is always fine.

    So you should decide on the camera that suits your style best; which offers you the options you need. more to the point, the camera that floats your boat and makes you happy to take photographs
    I'll drink to that, hic
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •