I am relieved that you didn't find it an issue and would be interested to hear your 'explanation'. I recently processed some shots in LR and Iridient and sent them off for printing, along with the JPEGs. I tried to get them all to look as satisfactory as I wanted on-screen. Of course, in addition to some differences in how the sharpening looks they also differ slightly in colour and contrast. The prints were 12x8 glossy, not enormous but big enough. I could barely tell the difference between them but most of the time I preferred the JPEGs!! I am learning how to look at pictures in LR now at 1:2 rather than 1:1. I am hoping that I am cured of my tendency to look for the occasional weirdness of X-trans at 100% viewing and the energy-draining comparisons in RAW converters!Lee ( sapphire was correct..do not chase the painterly effect..one is bound to find it!! ). Here are three images. Fuji rendering of foliage is very very satisfactory for
me. I do not want to chase any more ghosts.
I do have an explanation for this effect. Later..
I do not notice any ' painterly effect ' etc.
I believe that Fuji have a secret sauce for Asian and S.E. Asian Foliage. No harm asking them if it could be adapted to the Western greens.
Very responsive company that; Fuji. You never know.
Lee