Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
.. : ) ..
..It's invisible, made from green kryptonite, so you'll lose your superpowers and maybe die if you touch it :shocked:
I do not think you need C1 for either...
..
...
yes
by origin I was writing something about it was hard to be a Z-enthusiast when Fuji launch i MF rangefinder for perhaps about same price, but luckily lenses will be far more expensive.
I'm saved. But then I saw the other thread in MF threads and gave up. And I cant proces in C1 either :thumbdown:...so Nikon come and save me.....
I can’t see but a corner of some black plastic gizmo.
Dunno - it's the sauce or the kryptonite !I can’t see but a corner of some black plastic gizmo.
Well, I guess it’s worked out well for Hasselblad with the X1D. However, I do wonder about the Fuji GF lenses on such a body - it strikes me that the Fuji lenses are larger and more likely to be a poor balance on a smaller body. However, who knows until we see one?Anyone think this camera is a silly idea?
I guess it all depends on what lenses you want to hang off the thing - me I just use a wide a normal and a portrait prime kit on MF and Fuji's 3 arent large.Well, I guess it’s worked out well for Hasselblad with the X1D. However, I do wonder about the Fuji GF lenses on such a body - it strikes me that the Fuji lenses are larger and more likely to be a poor balance on a smaller body. However, who knows until we see one?
Well, I guess it’s worked out well for Hasselblad with the X1D. However, I do wonder about the Fuji GF lenses on such a body - it strikes me that the Fuji lenses are larger and more likely to be a poor balance on a smaller body. However, who knows until we see one?
The 45mm and 63mm aren’t very large at all and the 32-64 is reasonably sized. The 120 macro and 110mmm are pretty large but not unreasonably so. I’m sure the 250 is pretty big but I haven’t seen it or the 23mm in person.Well, I guess it’s worked out well for Hasselblad with the X1D. However, I do wonder about the Fuji GF lenses on such a body - it strikes me that the Fuji lenses are larger and more likely to be a poor balance on a smaller body. However, who knows until we see one?
Ok, 50R is AF like the 50S.Trouble is both the 45 and 63 do not feature LM motors and as such if I were to buy the GFX in any form those LM lenses would be my preference.
BTW does anyone know if the 50R will have only MF?