Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Hey JackGot it Carlos, Thanks! And your action set should be in yours!
Guess I need to get the newest version now that I am fully into MFHi Woody,
I'm not sure what set you have, but they were last updated in early 2009. THey now include separate sets for higher rez MF backs, as well as a refined set for cameras under 20MP.
Got mine and it works, thanks, Jack.Hi Woody,
I'm not sure what set you have, but they were last updated in early 2009. They now include separate sets for higher rez MF backs, as well as a refined set for cameras under 20MP.
My theory is that, if you use any digital other than MF for 1Mpx output you need to downs res by a factor 9 to eliminate the effect of the Anti-aliasing filter (which spreads the light destined for one pixel over all the adjacent pixels), and then you have to down-res by a factor of 4 to eliminate the effect of Bayer interpolation, so a Full-format Canikon 35mm camera would have to be 36 Mpx to produces a "perfect" 1Mpx file?Finally, if somebody is only shooting for web output, then yes, MF file size is probably overkill. However, the minute you start talking print output, the more native resolution the better.
Got mine and it works, thanks, Jack.
If there is a line 2 pixels wide (e.g. a hair) and you down-rez 60Mpx to 1Mpx, will the line still visible? and how?
This might indicate that local contrast enhancement on the raw file (Clarity in Phocus) might help?...Often, that 1 or 2 pixel line will remain as a 1 pixel line if there is enough contrast in the original file. If not, it may disappear.