Electronic shutter in combination with image stabilisation

[diet_sch]

Electronic shutter in combination with image stabilisation in long distance shots lead to surreal results
Fujifilm GFX100 - 600mm - IBIS - 1/1000s

 

[MGrayson]

Tell me about it...

Untitled by Matthew Grayson, on Flickr

 

[Knorp]

Weird - I thought this kind of distortion only occurred with movement by either user or subject (or both).

 

[MGrayson]

Weird - I thought this kind of distortion only occurred with movement by either user or subject (or both).

In all seriousness, I'm assuming that's a non-native lens. I had a lot of weird interaction with, e.g., Canon lenses - stabilized or not - with the Fuji IBIS. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the sensor drifting during the exposure. I had better results with the Fuji 250 + 1.4x than with the Canon 400/5.6 for just that reason.

 

[diet_sch]

Mamiya 645 Sekor 5.6/300mm ULD + Mamiya 2x
The lens is all mechanical - there is no data influence possible to the camera body.

Movement of user - no tripod

 

[nameBrandon]

In all seriousness, I'm assuming that's a non-native lens. I had a lot of weird interaction with, e.g., Canon lenses - stabilized or not - with the Fuji IBIS. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the sensor drifting during the exposure. I had better results with the Fuji 250 + 1.4x than with the Canon 400/5.6 for just that reason.

Did we already talk about this? I can't remember.. what other lenses did you try on the telephoto end with the GFX 100 sensor?

I've got the following coming as rentals as I really don't want to deal with the size of the GFX 250mm.. but if none work out, I may have to..

• Sigma 100-400 5-6.3
• Sigma 150-600 Contemporary (5-6.3)
• Canon 100-400 II
• Canon 70-300L IS

Also doing some testing on the wide end to avoid buying the 23mm but we'll see, that one is more about having a wider zoom than the size of the 23mm..

• Sigma ART 12-24
• Sigma ART 14-24

 

[MGrayson]

The 250/4 is not that large, and is certainly lighter than it looks. It is quite special, and is the only lens I really miss from the GF system. (Getting off topic - Sorry!)

 

[diet_sch]

In my photograph we are talking of a focal length of 600mm - there is no Fuji lens that could do that.

 

[MGrayson]

In my photograph we are talking of a focal length of 600mm - there is no Fuji lens that could do that.

Yes, of course. I was responding to nameBrandon. Apologies for my lack of clarity.

 

[diet_sch]

A less funny result with the same lens - the result is limited by the condensed atmosphere

 

[Knorp]

It's an ES anomaly not in particular related to Fuji or your camera for that matter, but rather a feature if you like of the slow sensor read-out time.
Simple remedy: use a tripod or use EF next time.

 

[Gerd]

It's an ES anomaly not in particular related to Fuji or your camera for that matter, but rather a feature if you like of the slow sensor read-out time.
Simple remedy: use a tripod or use EF next time.

However, he used the ES.

And the anomaly clearly looks like a rolling shutter.

The subject didn't move, of course, but the camera in the hand did. However, the IBIS was turned on and configured correctly.

I am not sure how the rolling shutter effect came about here. Maybe the IBIS is no longer sufficient at 600mm?

Greetings Gerd

 

[diet_sch]

More and less body-shaking

 

[Paul2660]

He is trying to hand hold a 600mm lens. Even with stabilization in camera via IBIS he can control his slight body movements. I can’t hold a 400mm lens for shots with this type of distance. I would sure try the same shots with a tripod.

Paul

 

[diet_sch]

I would sure try the same shots with a tripod.

Of course, the tripod is the solution. But I found it interesting to try the IBIS, which also worked well. I used the ES because I had blur when taking photos from the tripod, which disappeared when I switched to the ES.