Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And donāt forget to say hi!
My understanding this is already the case but requires a hack. The big change of supporting Hasselblad files would be to have lens corrections and specific color profiles."Capture One is expected to soon start working with Hasselblad files"
I've already tried the hack. The results are quite good, but lens corrections and color profiles are indeed what I'm looking for.My understanding this is already the case but requires a hack. The big change of supporting Hasselblad files would be to have lens corrections and specific color profiles.
C1 cannot understand .FFF or .3FR files. There is no hack available for those formats. It is possible to export Hasselblad files as .DNG, then the Exif maker tag has to be changed from "Hasselblad" to something else. Then C1 can import these DNG. But these files don't have lens and color profiles included. They don't look the same as exported files from Phocus.My understanding this is already the case but requires a hack. The big change of supporting Hasselblad files would be to have lens corrections and specific color profiles.
Maybe an indication of the demise of Hasselblad's H system? Without the H system Hasselblad would be no longer a direct competitor to PhaseOne.
This is a function of the split of Phase One and Capture One as independent companies, nothing to do with Hasselblad. The new C1 iPad app is a big step for them (and is pretty enjoyable to use), and I think an indicator that weāre about to see new direction and capabilities for C1 which is, IMO, a great thing.My understanding this is already the case but requires a hack. The big change of supporting Hasselblad files would be to have lens corrections and specific color profiles.
Maybe an indication of the demise of Hasselblad's H system? Without the H system Hasselblad would be no longer a direct competitor to PhaseOne.
The private equity group that acquired Phase One and Capture One in 2019 are primarily looking to Capture One for growth in their investment. "Capture One...has contracts with Leica, Fujifilm, and Phase One for supporting their full range of cameras." "Capture One will continue its high growth in 2022, based on new products, new distribution systems and new OEM partnerships." [source: Phase One Group ApS 2021 Annual Report].This is a function of the split of Phase One and Capture One as independent companies, nothing to do with Hasselblad. The new C1 iPad app is a big step for them (and is pretty enjoyable to use), and I think an indicator that weāre about to see new direction and capabilities for C1 which is, IMO, a great thing.
Hasselblad engineers worked closely with Adobe to get Lightroom files as close to results from Phocus as possible. It seems a number of people prefer to use Lightroom for their Hasselblad files, but I've preferred to use Phocus. I also know a couple of Hasselblad users that prefer Iridient Developer for their post processing.Iād love to see another option outside of Phocus for full profile / lens correction support. LR works but if one needs critical color work and lens corrections with Hasselblad, Phocus is still the only game in town.
The private equity group that acquired Phase One and Capture One in 2019 are primarily looking to Capture One for growth in their investment. "Capture One...has contracts with Leica, Fujifilm, and Phase One for supporting their full range of cameras." "Capture One will continue its high growth in 2022, based on new products, new distribution systems and new OEM partnerships." [source: Phase One Group ApS 2021 Annual Report].
While it's certainly possible that an independent Capture One could support Hasselblad 3F or 3FR files, It's still a question of whether the new management will permit it or continue the defensive position. They have a new CFO who started about 4 months ago. As more fresh viewpoints come on board, it may improve the prospects for the barricade coming down.
Unfortunately, 2021 was the third year in a row of financial losses with Phase One Group posting a loss of 7 million euro. That may also provide some incentive to increase the Capture One revenue stream by letting in new customers.
Agreed! I use the same 16-bit TIFF workflow for anything where I need specific lens correction or critical color work. Itās an awesome option and I love that I can do that via Phocus.Phocus does render Hasselblad files differently using its own unique process and methodology which utilizes their extensive sensor calibration data and lens data to the fullest extent. I've been happy with creating 16-bit TIFF files in Phocus and using Photoshop for any final retouching. There are options available for Hasselblad files, but I agree with you about wanting to see more options. I always like having more options! The more options available, the greater the likelihood of finding the closest match for your individual needs and preferences.
Right. Phase One and Capture One are separate companies. They've been separate companies for 2-1/2 years. They share ownership by the same corporate parent Phase One Group ApS which controls both entities. The separation appears to be a very good thing for Capture One and its future. It will be interesting to watch as it develops.āStarting out as a RAW image converter for Phase One cameras in 1994, Capture One became an independent company in 2020 after Phase One was acquired by Nordic private equity investor Axcel. With the decision to separate the software division from the camera manufacturer, Capture One could carve its own path as the definitive photography software company. ā
Source - https://www.captureone.com/en/press
P1 is no longer calling the shots for the team at C1.
I totally agree with you. The current environment is far more favorable than it has ever been for a more open environment with Capture One.So yes, many factors could prevent Hasselblad 3FR from working in C1, but the point is that the current environment is far more favorable than it has ever been for a change like this.
Speculation that the parent PE firm would insist on the status quo is no different than speculation that we will see an evolution of C1 to support Hasselblad raw files.
I don't wonder about "China!" and Hasselblad at all. I just wonder what I can photograph with one.Wonder how much of or whether the whole body from now will be āmade in Chinaā!
It's been well over 5 years since DJI acquired Hasselblad. The evidence of major changes that I've seen is that Hasselblad now has adequate funding, is profitable, and has a new development partner in DJI with some terrifically talented engineers. What I haven't seen is any evidence of production changes.After a few years of ownership by DJI would not be surprised if the majority of the production has moved to Asia by now.
Let's ignore the Weibo body part production leak then.It's been well over 5 years since DJI acquired Hasselblad. The evidence of major changes that I've seen is that Hasselblad now has adequate funding, is profitable, and has a new development partner in DJI with some terrifically talented engineers. What I haven't seen is any evidence of production changes.
That cameras, like any other high-tech products, have component parts from all over the world is no surprise. That electronic components driving cameras (even legendary European brands) come from "Asia" is no surprise. That camera makers in Europe have partnerships with manufacturers and suppliers in "Asia" is no surprise.
Having spent some time online, it also doesn't surprise me to find people who want to plant seeds of suspicion without evidence. It doesn't surprise me to find there are still people that believe cameras and lenses are like wine grapes and require the right terroir in order to achieve excellence. Yeah, none of this surprises me in the least.
I confess that I am absolutely terrible at assuming anything. I usually try to leave that to the imagination of others who enjoy it. If you say "it is to be assumed", who am I to argue?...we can only estimate what the new apo S line for the mirrorless body will be like. I would assume nothing else than staggering in comparison, akin to the APO SL lenses in 35mm land. ...and it is to be assumed that the next S line will be another leap in performance compared to anything available in medium format.
I hope it takes its sweet time in getting here. I am definitely in no hurry for it.I cannot wait for 2024.