I don't have much to say, so I might as well not start a new thread. I compared the Hasselblad 2/110 on the X1D and Leica S3, and the S100/2 on the S3. The 2/110 is difficult to focus wide open, but 100% magnification makes it possible on both cameras, and easy on a tripod. Here's the weird part. CA was worst with the X1D and Lightroom - uncorrectable fringing. Noticeably better on the S3 and Lightroom. But best was the X1D and Phocus. And this was without even telling Phocus which lens it was, which helped with distortion and improved CA even more. Phocus also corrected the vignetting, which was rather strong on the 2/110 wide open.
Colors were very similar in either Phocus or Lightroom, X1D or S3 ... NOT using the Adobe profiles. The X1D would load with "Camera Standard". The S3 I used both the "Leica S3 Color" and the "Cobalt Standard" profiles. Blues were indistinguishable. Foliage had more yellow in the Hassy versions, but the tones could be matched very quickly with one slider. As noted before, the S100 AF worked fine and the images were pin sharp wide open. Bokeh slightly more pleasing on the 2/110. Both lenses and both cameras looked perfect and almost identical at f/5.6.
You may notice an absence of pictures. Trust me, they're boring. And none of them are of Soup.
I look forward to trying the 2/110 on the X2D. And the 38/2.5 is looking attractive.
Best,
Matt