P
Paul66
Guest
I have the Mamiya DM-Series 28Mp DSLR Camera and would like to know what I would need to use the back on a RZ series camera.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
There is one adapter for the RZ Pro IID (cable free) and a different adapter for the RZ Pro II (requires cable to lens). That's it. I strongly suggest the cable free solution (RZ Pro IID with adapter plate) since it's significantly more elegant to just put the back on the body and not have to worry about the cable.
We'd be happy to help with a rental-towards-purchase if you want to try how well an RZ fits your style before you buy.
Doug Peterson (e-mail Me)
__________________
Head of Technical Services, Capture Integration
Phase One Partner of the Year
Mamiya Leaf, Leica, Arca Swiss, Cambo, Profoto, LaCie, Canon, TTI, Broncolor & More
National: 877.217.9870 | Cell: 740.707.2183
Newsletter | RSS Feed
Buy Capture One 6 at 10% off
I like the idea of being able to shoot a waist level, I have a Hasselblad 500 C/M and like the feel of shooting it.i still can't see the point...
i have a DF... really mobile... but when i wants more movements, then i'm using a monorail in the studio... Arca M line two, arca F line 69... linhof...
The RZ is bulky, and does not have movements... what's the point ?
i probably miss something there !
i still can't see the point...
i have a DF... really mobile... but when i wants more movements, then i'm using a monorail in the studio... Arca M line two, arca F line 69... linhof...
The RZ is bulky, and does not have movements... what's the point ?
i probably miss something there !
I also use an IQ180 on a DF. I never got used to this DF camera - really don't like it personally. The RZ is an appealing option to shoot with thanks to its waist level finder and (maybe) funnier system to use.I like the idea of being able to shoot a waist level, I have a Hasselblad 500 C/M and like the feel of shooting it.
Interesting no one added the rotating back as a great feature. I do have a WLF on my Hasselblad H3d2-39, but it doesn't work for verticals. I have to put on the other viewfinder or use just a part of the sensor and leave the WLF on. Of course, looking down into the WLF of the RZ is a better experience than on the Hasselblad.Personally, I also like looking down into the WLF of the RZ, and also the ergonomics and feel of the focusing rail as I do so - even if it is not a large sensor.
Yes, you do miss something here.i still can't see the point...
i have a DF... really mobile... but when i wants more movements, then i'm using a monorail in the studio... Arca M line two, arca F line 69... linhof...
The RZ is bulky, and does not have movements... what's the point ?
i probably miss something there !
I don't have the RZ, just playing around with the idea of getting one to replace the Mamiya 645 DF, for some reason I like the RZ better handling wise.
Thanks for all the information.